[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
10/19/25(Sun)10:06:59 No.76741856
Anonymous 10/19/25(Sun)10:06:59 No.76741856 Archived
Which is more effective for gains, zero sets of infinite reps or infinite sets of zero reps?
>>
Anonymous
10/19/25(Sun)10:10:53 No.76741868
Anonymous 10/19/25(Sun)10:10:53 No.76741868
>>76741856
Would an infinitely held isometric count as infinite reps or none?
>>
Anonymous
10/19/25(Sun)14:26:07 No.76742595
Anonymous 10/19/25(Sun)14:26:07 No.76742595
>>76741856
Infinite sets of zero reps is WAY better. Why do you even need to ask?
>>
Anonymous
10/19/25(Sun)14:52:37 No.76742659
Anonymous 10/19/25(Sun)14:52:37 No.76742659
>>76741856
I've been doing infinite sets of zero reps from the day I was born.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.