Is this good for you?
>>76756505Gives you giant fingers apparently
>>76756505That's far from enough to give you heart problems related to excessive cardio. And anyone doing a 50k just to post it and call themselves an ultrarunner do not achieve ultrarunning status. A 50k is a poorly measured marathon. If you want to run a 50k trail race because it's a good distance for a trail race cool but this is extremely gay and also not impressive
>>76756563So you do it, or you're worse and less impressive than gayness.>You won't
>>76756563pretty sure running for 5 hours straight is probably bad for you in certain ways
>>76756576I've ran a 50 miler at a faster pace than that off a track. And max distance is 100 mi < 24hrs. Why else would I be gatekeeping? It's annoying seeing these egotist do it purely for attention. In runner community, along with any other community, there are people who need to feel like other people are impressed by what they do but marathons are common enough that at this point they may not see it as impressive enough. To be impressive they can either run a marathon fast (actually takes work) or they can go beyond a marathon. So you see a lot of people doing a 50k and then broadcasting how they are ultrarunners and how crazy this challenge was because it's the tinest notch above a marathon that people accept. But it's <5mi past the marathon distance. With the walk to and back from the marathon you can easily approach an unofficial 50k around a marathon. So people who do it like OP pic are douches and I dislike them greatly. It goes against the general vibe of ultrarunning/trail running which is a pretty cool community
>>7675650550km isn't much longer than a marathon and that means he took over 4 hours to run a marathon which is below average
>>767568894 hours isn't average it's a good achievable time, it's the 1/2/3/4 of long distance. Scaling up on a straight line basis from a 4 hr marathon, you'd get 4 hours 46 minutes. So took an hour longer than a good distance runner. Impressive to do this on a track I guess but cringe post.
>>76756505>aussie>chink phenotypeChecks out.
>>76756505what pop culture hollywood npc media inform npcs to start saying "the lion..."?
>>76756505Lions don’t run a lot. They lay around most of the day and only move when it’s time to kill something, which they do as a pack in short bursts
>>76756505Without any training yeah. But humans are endurance animals, so it's not insane either.
>>76756618Cope
>>76756988It wont even get you accepted in a major marathon. Its slow as shit. Youre gay and probably suck cocks
>>76757440And without warming up and doing 30 min stretches.
>>76757452Seethe. This is a common mentality amongst ultrarunners. We all independent see how gay these types of people are and dislike them. A sub 3 marathon and way way way harder than a 11+ min / mi paced 50k (on a track too, made it as easy as possible to just barely hit that ultra mark)
>>76756505What do you mean "for you"He broke PR, he's improving, and surpassed himself.
>>76756505Good for your heart, bad for your knees
>>76757457It’s not good by runner standards but it’s a good time for an average joe to hit. Hence comparison to 1/2/3/4, achievable by basically everyone but needs the work to be put in. I have never suck a cock, so there.
>>76756505Is what good for you ? putting your phone on a roomba ?
>>76758141Wayyyyyy more people can run a 4h marathon than bench 2pl8, hell even for women it's below average.By proportion a 3:30 or even 3:15 marathon is a more accurate comparison.
>>76758332That’s a selection bias surely. 99.9% of people couldn’t run a marathon sub 4 hours. It only seems like that’s an average time when comparing against other marathon runners.
>>76758500I could say exactly the same about the 2pl8 bench, except the percentage would be even higher.Skinny dyels who do a sport as a past time could probably run sub-4 with a few weeks training, but they'd have to work for a year or longer to get a 2pl8 bench.For the vast majority of women or old people the 2pl8 bench will never be attainable, but the sub-4 marathon will within a few months.Really the only group who would find the 2pl8 bench easier are overweight males or very athletic males who are too heavy for long distance, this subgroup of people is smaller than the former in my previous paragraph.
>>76756505There was an ultra lean cardio obsessed fitness youtuber that died relatively recently, I believe he was British
>>76756889the predicted marathon time from his jog is bad
>>76758015>bad for your knees
>>76756505>gps 50k buddy only ran 49.9 for surebetter go again
>>76756618Strava or it didn't happen
>>76759880An easy course but I was specifically curious how fast I could run a 50 miler after doing a lot of endurance training and the race was close to me
>>76760234>>76759880I swear I added the pic
I know a guy who does super marathons and he walks around like an old man
>only 3 kudosI would rope
>>76756505"The lion" performs tricks in the circus for the amusement of drunks and children.
>>76760237hope you ate up well from that trek nigga
>>76760237Based retard.
>>76756505>almost 7 minutes per kmBarely even running
>>767569881/2/3/4 for a marathon would be way closer to 3 hours. Maybe 3:15 at the most is like deadlifting 4pl8, if not 3 hours flat. 4 hours is in the you’re not training properly territory for a healthy young man
>>76756505What does giving the camera the bird do, besides signal to everyone you are a member of the lower class?
>>76761235Making you reply
