The easiest way to spot a roider is to see if they have excessive nasolabial folds and facial aging for their age.Literally every roider has these signs of premature aging.So whenever you ask yourself "Is he really natty?" if he's under the age of 50 and have ginormous nasolabial folds he's likely not natty.
>>76804390Now of course Juji is not natty, but if you ever see anyone claiming natty with these folds, now you know he's lying.Or possibly Vegan
>>76804390Correct but also not entirely. These usually show up from heavy DHT steroid abuse I've noticed among the people I know who are competing, but people who use milder stuff or T-based roids, or SARMs do not have these. I've mostly seen those in people running high doses of Mast/Primo etc.
>>76804390is this really the shit you losers sit around thinking about?holy shit get a fucking life
>>76804826>butthurt roid faggot detected
>>76804390Pretty much everyone who is big but lean is a roider
>>76804864Everyone who looks good basically
>>76805058wrong. According to 4chan dyels EVERYONE on roids look like shit. Even Arnold >>76803484
>>76804390>Literally every roider has these signs of premature aging.Strongest man of all time is natty?
>>76804390Yeah — this post is likely bait.Here’s why:1. Overconfidence + oversimplification:It claims there’s an “easiest way to spot a roider” and that “literally every roider” has a certain facial feature — that’s way too absolute. Physiology, genetics, hydration, lighting, and even smiling can all affect facial folds. There’s no single reliable “tell” like that.2. Pseudo-scientific tone:It uses scientific-sounding words (nasolabial folds, premature aging) but applies them in a way that isn’t grounded in endocrinology or dermatology. It’s dressed up to sound factual but isn’t actually evidence-based.3. Platform and tone:It’s from 4chan’s /fit/ board — notorious for bait posts mixing half-truths with exaggerated “bro science” to spark arguments in the comments.4. Emotional framing:The “is he really natty?” framing is designed to trigger debate and moral judgments — classic bait for engagement and tribalism in fitness discussions.So yes — it’s bait. It’s written to look smart and observational but mainly to provoke people into arguing about who’s “natty” or not.Would you like me to break down why that “nasolabial folds = steroid use” claim doesn’t hold up scientifically?
>>76805529 1. What nasolabial folds actually areThey’re the natural skin creases running from the sides of your nose to the corners of your mouth.Everyone has them — they just deepen due to:Genetics (some people’s bone structure emphasizes them)Age (loss of collagen + fat under the skin)Facial expressions (people who smile a lot form stronger folds)Body fat changes (cutting fat or dehydration makes facial lines sharper)So: deeper folds ≠ steroid use. They’re primarily genetic + aging + leanness indicators.--- 2. Why “steroids cause facial aging” is oversimplifiedAnabolic steroid use can affect the skin and face over long periods — but not in this linear way.Here’s what actually happens:Hormonal imbalance can increase oil production, acne, or water retention.Fluctuating body fat + muscle fullness can change how the face looks, especially when cycling on/off compounds.Possible collagen alteration with prolonged, heavy abuse, there may be some minor skin-aging effects, but studies don’t support a unique “roid face” pattern like nasolabial folds.Most visible “aging” comes from:Extreme cutting phases (face looks gaunt)DehydrationTanning, sun exposure, or low subcutaneous fat, not the drugs themselves.--- 3. Why the meme persistsThe “roid face” stereotype is mostly a forum myth — guys spot someone ultra-jacked with harsh lighting or sharp facial lines and assume gear. But in reality:Lean faces show folds.High testosterone (even natural) can thicken skin or jaw features.Many lifters using gear don’t show these folds, and plenty of naturals do.It’s confirmation bias: people see what fits the story they already believe.--- 4. The bottom lineDeep nasolabial folds ≠ proof of steroid use.Visible aging ≠ proof either.The only reliable indicators come from bloodwork, drug testing, or confession, not facial structure.
>>76805529I hope you die, faggot.
>>76805537Post body
>>76804390there are these two huge guys at my gym who both openly say that they take roids and dont care about, they even told other guys at the gym that if they want to start roiding just aks them and they would help them get the drugs
>>76804390Juji was using in his early 20's when people thought he was natty btwt. guy that used to talk to juji on aol instant messenger
>>76804442High dose mast creates dogshit troll body like Dr Todd Lee.
>>76806004>Calls himself the Anabolic Acrobat>Dude he’s nattyI’m always surprised how stupid people are
>>76806174He didn't call himself that back then, but you're correct regardless. People think picrel was when he was natty but I used to talk to him then and he was already on baby 500mg test cycles
>>76805521Genetic outliers are outliers. Dude probably takes like 500mg test. Thats all Zavickas needs. Losers like Juji (and me) need to blast 2-3 grams per week of a mix of steroids, injectables and orals and ancillaries just to not look like shit.
>>76804390I always had deep nasolabial folds and look old for my age, I'm natty for life, can only bench 100kg x 8 and would get called dyel if I posted body lolBeing ugly/looking shit for your age doesn't automatically mean you're on gear bro. Of course Juji in your example is blasting though
Based on this criteria, would you say this guy at my gym is roided? He's supposed to be 23 but his face looks older to me
>>76804390Yes Anon, definitely when I look at someone the first thing I check is their nasolabial folds. In fact I hear WADA does random unannounced checks on all Olympic Athletes where they bust down your door and examine your nasolabial folds.
>>76804390Chud lines are ACK-shilly a more general sign of collagen skill issues; the wrong roids, aging, dysgenic genetics, tanning, shit-tier skincare skills, and eating to many AGEs are all different mechanisms that cause them.Personally, I can only get Chud lines by doing a very exaggerated trollface or Cheshire cat type grin. I'm mid 30s and only roid with ecdy, do all the deranged China peels and shit that upregulates collagen.>>76805529>>76805534S-tier clanker slop bro but just look at >>76804692Excess androgens literally bog u through collagen skill issues.>Testosterone delays vascular smooth muscle cell senescence and inhibits collagen synthesis via the Gas6/Axl signaling pathway>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11357-016-9910-5
>>76807372>screenshotting random people's ig storiesDog just tell him you want to suck his dick
Your best friend Tom Boyden, whatever happened there?
>>76807372yah he has all the anti-social markers for it
>>76805521That man clearly has some kind of atavistic WHG admixture driving him.Balts are one of those weirdly powerful races.They’re like Elves who were never turned into Orcs (Slavs) but their Hunnic tormentors.
>>76806230Imagine throwing this away.
>>76804390How much of an absolute fucking retard do you have to be if that's what you're looking for to judge if someone is roiding or not.
>>76804390
>>76808144>atavisticThanks for the new vocab.
>>76807372From his face, he has an iq of a room temperature and a discipline of a kid on a severe adhd with a zero impulse control. Even if he was 70kg dyel, he would still be on roids.
>>76804390im only 30, never roided or done any kind of drugs and have them bad : (
>>76808763now ur an unc fr bruh deadass
>>76805529Away you hop, AI slop.
>>76807516are you the guy who spdnds 1k usd monthly to slow dpwn aging?
>>76806003That's nice of them.
>>76807304>just to not look like shithe looks like shit though big shit but still shit
>>76804864What if I cut aggressively after lifting my ass off for like 3 years?
>>76806003Cool bros sharing knowledge and power right there, negro. You’re lucky.
>>76806230>19yo in pic
>>76808144Gem post>>76808685This
