Eat carbs
>>76868363> A 31 year old man was eating too much protein and instead starting eating semen cutting his body fat percentage in half. OP is a faggot
>>76868363
problem with this great new diet is most of us have already done it because it's easy to eat tons of carbs and not much protein and it doesn't work
>>76868363>Eating useless macronutrients (carbs) and working out leads to weight losswhoa
>>76868363I eat 600g oats per day
glucose is best thing humans can eat for satiety, weight loss and good lipid profileworst things are1. trans fats (fried foods, frozen french fries, potato chips, some pies, some ice creams)2. fructose (sodas, fruit juices, jams, and other foods with lot of added sugar).3. saturated fat4. fat overall, fat that you eat is the fat that you wearglucose burn as heat, wont raise ldl, good satiety. it's the best food for humans, so potatos, rice, even pasta.
>>76869505lipid science is the most flawed science currently available
>>76869521'something that a fat-addict would say' award
>>76869524yeah that's it and perfectly explains long term high fat diet crazy high LDL zero arterial calcification subjects
>>76869483Oats, bread and pasta everyday crew
>>76869541ldl has cumulative effect. almost all proper studies show it very clearly. if you have study comparing high end ldl (barely withing guidelines) to high, you will have individual variety, especially some women are immune to calcificationbut low ldl protects massively. this we know if we give people statins and bring down ldl to super low and keep it there for 5-10 years the arteriy calcification will regress good amount
>>76869553statins work but it has nothing to do with LDL. we have long term high LDL subjects with zero arterial calcification. lipid science is horrendously flawed at best if not outright wrong
>>76869559some people have immune to calcification this is well known, it's genetic 20% of caucasians. women are more likely, men are less likely to be immunestatins work mainly by lowering ldl and apo, not by lowering "inflammation" this is nonsensecausal effect, ldl particle causes damage is proven.you will be fucked in your 50's if you have any family background with heart disease (some one on statins) and have ldl high or barely withing guidelines from ages 25-50.then when you're 50 -60 years old, it's suddnely "woops, here's 90% blockade in your artery to heart, that's why you get angina during exertion "at that point people are fucked, they can survive if they are put on statins and blood thinners, and probably blood pressure meds too, but it will be lowered life quality. many times they suggest angioplasty (stent in artery, easy procedure) it will be there rest of the life
>>76868363>i will not live in the pod. >i will not own nothing. >i will not eat the carbs. it's as simple as that
no crabs
>>76869618you have to cherry pick criteria to create your LDL Boogeyman which is exactly what I'm saying lipid science is a fraud
>>76869639it probably is not fraud if you're among the 80% of male population that is not Immune to heart disease due to specific geneticsit's leading cause of death, and in 50-60's men realize too late their ldl been too high too long. at that point when the fuirst symptoms arrive, it's really bad, it means typically 90-95% blockade to have first big symptoms, sometimes the first symptoms stroke, not angina, and death. quite common.it would be good to monitor your arteries too with age, several methos to film them by docs. neck veins too (going to brain) not just those leading to heart.you can eat tasty foods plenty with no ldl effect, like i said, many pasta dishes are like that for example.
>>76869671poor genes, overeating and lack of exercise cause heart disease. eating fat is neither here nor there
>>76868363>n = 1also i just dont think i can trust something said by a person named "gabby". like yeah i know thats not a jewish name or anything but gabby just doesnt seem trustworthy you know
>>76869505>worst things are>1. trans fatsOkay buddy, WHOA. Stop. Lets unpack this.
>>76869671What is the fix for this? Do I just gotta take statins at age 28? My last LDL check was in the 150s
>>76869738sometimes for high risk group, (family history of heart disease, parents on statins etc for example), high blood pressure, or high a1c( blood glocse average) they can be recommended taking statins in their 30's or 40's. especially if they are overweight then statin therapy can come to question. Less than 100 = optimal100-129 = near optimal/above optimalfor lean people it's typically 40's to prevent heart disease if family risk is clear>What is the fix for this? Do I just gotta take statins at age 28? My last LDL check was in the 150sso, if you're ok otherwise healthy, not very fat etc. you should not yet jump on statins. you can bring it down with just diet changes and a bit exercise. long term however ldl in 150's may cause progressive artery damage. so you would be pretty typical case if ldl is 150-160, in your 50's you would likely have 40-80% blockades in arteries already, fully depending on genetic factors and family risk. try get it down, 150's imo can cause damage still it's borderline level.one thing you can easily do just buy blood pressure meter(cuff to arm meter, wrist meters are bad) and take measurements at home now and then. try keep under 140/80, optimal 120/70. this is just general showing your insulin resistance (bp tend to go high when insulin resistance is worse) and heart health, but not necessarily showing high ldl.
All I know is that after eating fatty meat like pork I feel satiated and energetic. After eating carbslop I feel slow and crave more carbslop.
My LDL is 219... I am eating keto, no junk food. My heigh is 190 and weight is 101kg. Low muscle, high fat body type. Working out for a month like daily now. I am 32 yo. Am I doomed ? Blood pressure 120/80
>>76869553statins increase calcification not decrease it. The rest of what you said is wrong and or mumbo jumbo that gets passed off as science in service of pharmaceutical profits
>>76869553>but low ldl protects massively. this we know if we give people statins and bring down ldl to super low and keep it there for 5-10 years the arteriy calcification will regress good amountProof?
>>76868363And how did that affect his kidneys? Asking for myself.
hmmmm
>>76869553>ldl has cumulative effect. almost all proper studies show it very clearly.
>>76871063Are those carpet fibers stuck to her lips? Jew or jew adjacent confirmed.
>>76871154At the (((David Geffen))) school of medicine.
>>76869505>saturated fat>doesn't elaborateLolGlucose absolutely destroys every single cell it comes into contact with. It is one the most volatile compounds the human body creates, and even the small amount the body natually creates eventually kills red blood cells. Reducing glycation is the #1 way to reduce inflammation and chronic disease, and exogenous carbohydrates should absolutely always be avoided. Animals metabolize glucose first, and rapidly, strictly because of how dangerous it is for the body, much like how it does with fructose and alcohol.
>>76869553>the body makes a cholesterol transporter just to fuck up its own arteries>this is why we should administer drugs that suppress cholesterol productionEpic science you got there kid.
>>76869505All I can say is for about one year I was eating from 8 to 10 eggs a day as my main source of fat and my bloodwork was impeccable so I don't give a rats ass about "muh dietary fats"
>>76869454>useless macronutrientsThat's like jumbo shrimp
>>76869837you should get ldl down(less trans fats, saturated fat and fructose in diet) and lose weight if you're fat obviously...also one thing to guess family risk factor for heart disease is to measure lp(a), this is 90% genetic not diet related factor, once you measure it you know it rest of your lifeif it's very high like 10% of people have then the risk is quite high and ldl etc. other factors need to be very low. there are drugs in develppment to treat lp(a) and some special drugs to target it alredy (not statins). Blood pressure 120/80 that's goodyou can measure glucose a1c test, it's pretty important too, better than fasting glucose test
>>76869837and keto diet is probably not the best, you may do it like very short period if you try to lose water weight and so on, but it's not long term. Mainly because as you see, LDL is very high, there are people dying on extreme keto diets at young age because they simply eat fat too much, especially saturated fatsso try low fat diet instead of keto, glucose a lot is fine, and fructose mainly from fruits now and then. smoothies, fruit juices, sugar sodas are all really bad for ldl and triglycerides too, because the massive amount of fructose goes directly to liver. so it's not just saturated fat and trans fat that raises ldl, lot of fructose at one sitting is bad(pepsi max or coca cola zero are fine, they have no sugar). suclarose ie stevie is probably only sweetener that needs to be actively avoided, aspartamet etc. are all fine
>>76872473Why did mango wodzak and mcdougall who were low fat vegans die of heart attacks
>>76869559Cool, we have long term subjects who smoke tons of cigarettes and don’t have lung cancer too. The thing about research (and not being a braindead fucktard) is taking into consideration scales of power and not cherry picking your data. This is probably the most well researched phenomenon in dietetics, and basically anybody denying the ApoB -> CVD connection is a coping fat hog or a backwoods midwit who gets one shotted by chinese AI facebook memes. That is assuming you aren’t some broke paki being paid to spread misinfo online
>>76872485we have literal proof that apob fails to predict calcification thanks to the keto-cta study which will continuously flesh out how poorly understood lipid science is. the only solid predictor of calicifaction is the existence of calcification. that means lipid science is wrong. based on current understanding of lipid science these results are not possible and unexplainable
>>76872502
>>76872507That says the study was for 1 year in healthy people.....no one can eat keto 20' 30, 40 years without premature death.
>>76872524The study followed for 1 year iirc all the subjects were keto/carnivore 5+ years and with each update the results get increasingly favorable. They would not keep giving presentations and pushing their results if their hypothesis was wrong.
Scientifically speaking, best protection from clogged arteries is simply going outside and walking.I understand that you retards are unwilling to go outside, what I don't understand how you can afford to choose what to eat and what goyslop supplements to take without ever going outside, worthless neets.
>>76872480Potato Man would've died a lot sooner if he was Egg Man or Cow Man
>>76868363>Eat carbs
>>76871223>Glucose is not volatile at all, and it is certainly not one of the most volatile compounds the human body produces.>Why glucose is not volatile>“Volatile” means a substance easily evaporates and becomes a gas at normal temperatures.>Glucose:>is a large, highly polar molecule>forms extensive hydrogen bonds>has a very high boiling point (it decomposes before it ever boils)>remains in blood and tissues, not in breath>So glucose does not vaporize and cannot be exhaled.>What is volatile in the human body?>The body produces hundreds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), especially in the breath, sweat, and urine. Examples include:>Acetone – rises in fasting, ketogenic diets, or diabetic ketoacidosis>Isoprene – produced during cholesterol synthesis>Ethanol – produced in small amounts by gut microbes>Methanol, acetaldehyde, ammonia, and many others>These are small molecules with low boiling points—very different from glucose.
>>76873807Cool now ask chatgpt about glycation and advance glycation endproducts you moron. >inb4 le cooked meat AGEs
>>76873300Best protection is not eating sugar. The bodies main defense for glycation is to sacrifice red blood cells and push sugar into the blood. New blood cells are quick and easy to make. The problem is that blood sugar and glycated blood cells also destroy the endothelium around high turblence areas (always arteries). Arteries also tend to contain much more sugar because they carry it directly from the intestines initially. You will never see veinous blockages unless you replace a section of arteries with vein tissues or some other similar surgery.
>>76873840I don't sit on my ass all day so glucose doesn't end up stuck in arteries.
>>76873861you're going to get a considerable spike every single time you eat carbs regardless of your activity level, and elevating the randle cycle by eating fat at all too is going to make this worseSo yeah I guess don't eat fat if you're going to be stubborn. Not sure where you're getting your fat soluble vitamins from, unless you're a supplementevore or something.
>>76874008I'm not diabetic so it's not a problem.
>>76868363> Too much proteinSo most likely something like keto with plenty of fat so energy isn't an issue. Also no comment on the initial carb intake. Most likely very little to none.>Ate (subjectively) more carbsSo probably dropped most of the meat and fats, ate more carbs (than before) and started working out. No surprise he lost weight, happy for him.I find modern clickbait-newsfeed meta and anyone who falls victim to these blatant misdirections DISGUSTING.
>>76869505Excellent bait.
>>76868363Whole title could have just been replaced by >by doing full body workouts
>>76873318Sure....
>>76873318Homo Sapien is literally cow man you fucking dumbass (more specifically ruminant man with some very fiberous tubers)
