>Something advertised as low carb or even 0 carb>It has like 40 grams of carbs>But actually if you subtract the 10 grams of dietary fiber and the 8 grams of chelated sorbitol it's 0 carbs!What is this kind of thing? Is it real? I've started seeing it more lately and it's confusing. Reminds me of creative accounting. What does this mean when factoring in macros for nutrition?
Usually carbs are the filler, who the fuck is counting carbs but ketoschizos? Lacrima is too cute to be used for dumb posts, apply yourself.
>>76872936Ketoschizo is one person.
>>76872936>Lacrima is too cute to be used for dumb postsLacrima is dumb...
>>76872843Fiber can't convert to glucose and fiber is counted as a carb in amerilard land so yes net carbs is total carbs minus fiber anyone claiming otherwise is an absolute crackpot. There are some man made quasi fibers that may function differently but that's not a fact
Because if you ate 0 carbs you'd die and they have a product to sell.Cults don't work on reason, they work on feelings.
Anyone shilling against keto is either a completle retard or a generally powerless faggot.Although i will admit it does make you feel a little too good.
>>76873673Or maybe we just aren't diabetic and don't need extreme subhuman diets.
>>76872995some dumbness is necessary to max out cuteness
>>76873673oh no the potatoes I'm going insaaaane
