[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Overdeveloped, tumorous quads don't look aesthetic, and functionally they are mostly a hindrance

Fight me
>>
Its impossible to get overdeveloped quads if youre natural and lean
>>
You just have to choose the right shorts and socks. The heads of the two vastus peaking out like a pair of tits and flexing with every step is aesthetic as fuark. It's hypnotic the rod of a steam locomotive. No homo I just mire myself on the treadmill.
>>
>>76932941
It's all about proportions. If proportions are out of whack, it looks weird. Giant quads look fine on big ass jacked dudes because it fits the rest of them. They look stupid on SS idiots because their upper body looks tiny in comparison. Same thing for dudes with developed upper bodies and chicken legs.
>>
>>76932946
This. Not an issue for anyone but roid trannies
>>
>>76932946
Will Tennyson, though
>>
>>76932946
Is it though? I have seen many men and women with monstrous quads and I don't think all of them must have been roiding
>>
>>76932941
Only other straight guys like this look. Even fags don't like it. Let alone girls.
So do it for yourself but don't think it will impress anyone but your bros
>>
>>76932946
>>76932959
I did it and im natty
>>
the bigger muscles on your body have more growth potential such as back, legs and chest
>>
File: legs.mp4 (3.24 MB, 720x1280)
3.24 MB
3.24 MB MP4
>>76932941
>Overdeveloped, tumorous quads don't look aesthetic, and functionally they are mostly a hindrance

>>76932946
>Its impossible to get overdeveloped quads if youre natural and lean

Exactly right. Can you imagine what this lad looks like without his shorts? I mean, can you imagine it? Aesthetic perfection.
>>
>>76932964
They arent lean
>>
>>76933876
>>76932946
>impossible
He looks like he got BBL.
>>
File: Tom.jpg (207 KB, 1440x1737)
207 KB
207 KB JPG
>>76932941
The ones you posted are nowhere close to overdeveloped
>>
>>76933876
Man. It must suck to have muscle bellies that short.
>>
>>76932941
upset your skinny jeans won't fit anymore, zoom zoom ?
>>
>>76935741
As someone with a 38inch belly I am aiming for a sub 33inch belly rn what are you even on about
>>
>>76932941
Bigger calves mog tho, looks manly af imo
>>
>>76932966
So you're saying it's a good way to protect yourself from the predatory gym gays?
>>
>>76932941
True. The optimum physique is looking like you could kill someone 50 yards away with a large club in six seconds. Quads barely help.
>>
>>76932946
it's all proportions in the end
>>
>>76932941
>legs 2x/wk
All sarcoplasmic development you're right. Once you're heavy 1x/wk is kind of a lot. Not like they have a 50in vertical. I bet arnold could dunk kind of, jay cutler even less somehow.
>>
>>76935943
Nah jay could probably jump higher imo



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.