Natty or not?
>>76936716I unironically enjoyed this movie
>>76936716Supposedly one of the brothers was natty while the other wasn't, which is obviously bullshit, but it begs the question why you would lie about something like that. Why even mention roiding at all in that case
>>76936716if you don't look like this after 6 months of fucking around in the gym you're NGMI
>>76936919>why you would lie about something like that.Did they say which one? Nannies/cops got serious about steroids in the late 80s iirc so maybe deniability.
>>76936951I found that on an old chaos and pain article, but I double checked and I coudn't actually see him mentione which one it was so Jamie Lewis might have just made that up because I tried to find anything about it and all I found is that one of the brothers denied either of them was taking anything which is obviously bullshit