[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Has it really come down to this
>>
Yes, women are fat now.
>>
File: 1743248605783400.png (153 KB, 827x1185)
153 KB
153 KB PNG
>>76951238
Just lower your standards more.
>5'2'' or taller
What kind of retard doesn't want a 4ft qt that you can flip around with 1 hand?
>>
File: no standards.jpg (69 KB, 522x917)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>>76951238
>he doesn't date 23 year old women, muscle mommies, short queens, or married women
>>
>>76951238
these calculators are shit because they fail to account for the factors you've already inputted. according to this, for example, there are as many 18-20 y/o women who have a college degree as 40-42 y/o women. same goes for married, obese, etc. it even suggests there are as many 18-20 y/o women as there are 78-80



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.