>Saves your prison wallet from cancer
You should under no circumstance whatsoever eat nuts, seeds, or avocado
>>76997763>no you see, this indigestible, inflammatory carbohydrate that my body physically can't break down, really helps me fight off cancer by, uhh, making poop larger?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlKCcCpjH2MFibersisters...
>cellulose (basically eating ground up tree bark) will save you from cancerThink about how stupid you sound for a secondFiber shilling employs the exact same tactics as proteinslop shills, make up a problem to have you feel lack you need something then sell you that thing for x10 the price its supposed to be and you'll still buy it because you'll otherwise feel guilty not spending on your wellbeing
Hmm why is every discussion on every nutrition topic flooded with posts trying to 'blackpill' you on the thread topic? Could this be coordinated? Are you trying to make me mad on purpose?
>>76997778I don't take advice from women. Better luck next time
>>76997771your body can't break it down because your wrecked microbiomes that probably have cancer themselves aren't used to it
Why are there no clear statistics on cancer rates between people who do carnivore/keto vs vegan/vegetarian?
>>76997771>>76997767>>76997794
>>77000494Because all the carnivores die from heart attacks before the study ends
>>77000405Misery loves company. These are all people with autism. Autism is caused by an unbalanced microbiome. In like 80% of cases, people with autism have irritable bowel syndrome. These people can't eat anything without having digestive distress. So they come on here and tell people that spinach is toxic.
>>77000513>fruits and vegetables Veganiggers like to sneak that one in like they belong to the same group. Fruits = edibleVegetables = inedible
>>77000546I think it's funny how you proved the meme correctly by not posting your body.
>>77000550I think its funny that your mother considered you not worthy of abortion, the one time feminism misfired
>>77000562>resorts to ad hom>still no bodyOof
>>77000546>Fruits = edible>Vegetables = inediblePlease tell me about the fat-burning benefits of kidney fat and how I can buy it in a pill from your website
>>77000568>>77000564
>>76997763The largest most expensive nutrition RCT that has ever and will ever be conducted refuted this idea. There may be some truth to this but the effect would have to inconsequentially small just like OPs cock
>>77000494There is but they find that vegans have the lowest rate of cancer followed very closely by vegetarians and thus /fit/ doesn't want to hear it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIhztQywAsk
>>76997794But fiber is incredibly cheap
>>77001095post the RCT
>>77003435>Our study is consistent with lack of association in that women in the intervention group modestly increased their fiber (Table 2) with no apparent benefit over 8.1 years of follow-up.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16467233/
>>77004129Holy moved goalposts Batman
>>76997763>gives you colon cancerFTFY
>>77004131what do you mean?> The Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial, a randomized controlled trial conducted in 48,835 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years recruited between 1993 and 1998 from 40 clinical centers throughout the United States.
>>76997778>Dr. Boznot even going to click it. It's like some people were born to grift.
>>77004288>>77003099bigger grifter
This is retarded. The only “advantage” of eating fiber is bigger shits and having to fart.>muh probioticAll it would do is breed gut bacteria that break down fiber and displace gut bacteria that actually help break down food you can digest. If anything it’s a malbiotic.>but muh science Is bought and paid for by gigantic megacorps selling you empty calorie veg at a 1000% markup.
>>77004198I mean, the claim of OP was that fiber was beneficial, not that increasing fiber from some random baseline would be beneficial. There's a vast difference between those two quantitative and qualitatively. It's similar to saying that staying hydrated is beneficial and then saying staying hydrated means drinking four glasses of extra water per day above and beyond natural hydration. Those are not the same thing.
>>77004395yes which is why this was the second half of my post>There may be some truth to this but the effect would have to inconsequentially small
>>77004401Yeah, you're drawing a conclusion to the original premise from a non-comparative premise. You're committing a logical fallacy.
>>77004406i dont think so. OPs premise was not so specific
>>77004412Oh, okay. I see that you're not conversing in good faith now. You previously agreed that that was the premise, and now you're backtracking because you don't want to seem incorrect or have gotten caught making a logical fallacy. I'm not going to further comment, since you're not engaging reasonably. Have a good day.
>>77004414thanks you too
>>76997763Personally I doubt that fiber does anything at all. I've come to the belief that it's actually electrolyte deficiencies that cause intestinal problems. Within the digestive track, electrolytes have the effect of drawing more water into the intestines which is one of benefits to digestion claimed to be associated with fiber.
>>77004435Well, at least half of your post has merit.
I think we might legitmately have reached a carniwhore / ketoschizo turning point on /fit/
>>76997771>>77004307I eat boatloads of fiber (from: leafy greens, sauerkraut and pickled fruits/vegetables, avocados, nuts seeds and berries, dark chocolate...) and barely poop at all. Should I be worried? I eat meat and eggs and stuff too so I shouldn't have any huge imbalances.
>>77000567what the absolute fuck do you think carrots have inside lmao
