BREAKINGLIFT GANG RISE UP
Why did it take this fucking long to happen?
There is no war on protein
>>76999663>*dies of heart disease*Dunno
>>76999675fag>>76999678fag
>>76999641>war on protein >literally every highly processed goyslop now has "PROTEIN" slapped on it and 300 lb hamplanets eat literal protein bars and protein chips
>>76999641Translation: he's continuing his year-long cocksucking of the beef and meatpacking industry. You retards will fall for anything.Fun fact: did you know that America's beef ranchers are collectively lobbying the government to ensure that beef prices don't go down so that their profit margins are maintained? This includes your average small town family farmer, by the way. Let's see if Robby-boy includes this in his "war on protein."
>>77000115They mean animal protein.>>77000119What's your point? There's a lobby for everything.
>>77000135The point is he isn't interested in helping you, dumbass. He's interested in helping the meat industry. (You) will see absolutely zero benefits from his actions.
>>77000142>He's interested in helping the meat industry.As opposed to helping the oilseed industry?
>>77000142Oh noo please don't promote meat! Anything but that! I only want to eat fake 3d printed red 40 goyslop!
What fucking "war on protein" is happening that they are "ending"?
>>77000158What if.............get this........................we didn't help any self-sustaining industry that's already turning a profit!!>>77000161I want a government, not a fucking ad agency. Since fucking when does meat need to be promoted? It's in your grocery store, there's a burger joint on every corner, and most of it is cheaper than every other mainstream protein source per pound. Literally what in the actual fuck needs to be promoted? Are people UNAWARE that you can eat meat?
>>77000163experts say you should eat a plant based diet and prefer things like beans and onions for your protein
>>77000166>Literally what in the actual fuck needs to be promoted? Are people UNAWARE that you can eat meat?And, per capita, 'Murrica eats more meat than any other country. Since 2009, it's been going UP, not down, as well.We definitely do not need to be jerking off the meat industry. It's fine as it is. It would be more fine if Trump stopped fucking up agriculture in general.
>>77000163it means we're going to sell lot of american beef to everyone in the world.
>>77000184We already do, or at least we did, until Trump fucked up trade agreements. He's going to come in with newer, shittier agreements and proclaim victory in half a year though, just like he did with soi. (Soi farmers got fucked because China stopped buying thanks to Trump's tarrif war, Trump made a """"deal"""" with China for them to purchase more soi, except it was THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT THEY WERE ALREADY GOING TO BUY UNDER BIDEN'S AGREEMENT HAD HE NOT FUCKED IT UP, except now we also had to agree to sell them better AI chips. Thanks Trump! More hilariously, Trump is now touting a $12B aid package for farmers, except it doesn't come close to offsetting the 44B in losses this year.)
>>77000190*Losses for 2025, not 2026.
>>77000166don't you have a protest to get to, sweetie?
>>77000142>he's subsidizing fresh meat>you won't get any benefit!I get to buy cheaper fresh meat you absolute dumbass. which is great given meat prices have basically tripled since covid.
>>77000119Oh no, the beef industry is lobbying. You know - the animal protein everyone on the planet should be eating? Yeah, they want to keep producing and be sustainable. How horrific. When will the poor soi and seed oil inudstry get their monies!!1!
>>77000496>thinking prices will go down when the beef industry explicitly does not want them tor e t a r detard>>77000545>the animal protein everyone on the planet should be eatingI like beef but the longest-living nations in earth eat it very rarely and for good reason. It's one of the least healthy types of meat, especially when poultry and fish are available.
>>77000449>oh yes daddy let me lick that boot and gobble that cock
>>76999641There is war on animal fats, otherwise proteinslop and fiber craze is at its peak
>>77000166seethe
>>76999641Good job FDA there's lead in food most commonly used by teenagers.
>>77001148What does the war consist of
>>77001148Exactly - it's been waged since the 80ies.
>>77001130>>thinking prices will go down when the beef industry explicitly does not want them toNo, retard Reddit soifaggot. A subsidy will cause prices to go down, they just wouldn't decrease by much because meats generally have a slightly elastic consumer demand. This is just elementary economics.>I like beef but the longest-living nations in earth eat it very rarely and for good reason. It's one of the least healthy types of meat, especially when poultry and fish are available.This is a retarded metric anyways, but regardless you're wrong again. Japan consumes plenty of beef and has one of the highest life expectancies in the world.
>>77000115>>76999675>>76999678>>77000119For the longest time the medical community has been recommending like 50 grams of protein a day, RFK is doubling that recommendation.No wonder people are so sick, if you follow dietary guidelines for the past few decades you're going to be malnourished. Vegan Tards coping.
>>77001147>Ohhh fuck I can only comprehend binary choices, nuance doesn't exist!!
>>76999675I dunno. The food pyramid that they advertised for a few decades (started in 1992) was like 12 servings of bread and pasta a day with 2 servings of meat. They dropped that in 2011 for pic rel but the old pyramid had massive staying power.My Plate was better, I guess, but a diet of half grains and fruit isn’t exactly balanced. All of the glucose and fructose with little protein or fat to slow absorption creates insulin spikes. That promotes fat production, can form insulin resistance, and causes energy crashes. It’s just a god awful guideline.
>>77000166Suppose some vital part of our existence, like meat and animal protein, were being controlled by corporations. Are we to stop eating meat because the corporations profit from it?I think you want everyone to be a farmer and to grow their own food, that's based, but until we can get there, people still gotta eat lil bro.>>77001344I've never been able to comprehend how people justify the excess carbs in modern diets. If anything, it's part of the reason people are so fucking obese, everything they eat, all the goyslop, is just loaded with bread/grain and carby bullshit. It's literal cattlefood, why would anyone eat cattlefood and call it healthy?
>>77001344If it we're me I'd switch that to half veggies (ideally leafy greens and cruciferous veggies), at least a quarter meat, then split the remaining quarter three ways with fruit, grains and dairy.On second thought, is that by volume or calories? If by calories the meat should be like 50%.
>>76999641RFK (Red Forty Kennedy) Jr. is personally adding forever chemicals in every package of goyslop so that (you) too, may glow in the dark.
>>77001335>implying government dietary recommendations have had any impact on public health in the last 50 yearsThe average amerilard consumes shitloads of fried meat you fucking moron. Burgers, steaks, pizza with processed dairy and meat. People are sick because they eat too much good stuff not because they don’t eat enough.
>>77001344>Grainsthis is really the only thing that triggers me because potatoes are superior
the Mediterranean diet is still the GOAT and it's pointless to discuss any other diet for daily consumption
>>77001392As somebody who actually lives in America, yes, the seedoil and food additives in goyslop meats is a problem, but I know so many people that all they eat is Carbs:Pizza, Buns, Bread, Fries, Rice, multiple servings, an order of bread-sticks before a restaurants meal followed by pasta. Seriously, it's bad, not to mention all the other additives put into the bread itself, and all the sprays that our grain gets covered in. They eat too much in general, but they eat more carbs especially, and really poor quality meat/protein. And yes, they are not getting more then 100 grams of protein max.
>>76999641fucking hell.
>>77001402If you're a Med, yes, but ancestral diets entail you eat closer to what your ancestors consumed. As a Northern European, I consume more dairy, because I am quite literally built for it.There is no one universal diet, but there is Ancestral Diets, which work best for everyone.I pity mutts.
>>77001335>For the longest time the medical community has been recommending like 50 grams of protein a dayNo it hasn't. The general advice has been 1g/lb since before 2010. I Don't understand why we have to be victims about fucking everything. The Jews aren't trying to war against protein.
>>77001410>seedoils, additives, sprays and other memes>they are bad because I just say they are okay?
>>77001413>1g/lb since before 2010. That's /fit/ advice, not official advice nor medical advice. Idk why you're bringing jews into this, but this was pretty well documented that the medical industry has been recommending low protein for awhile now.>The FDA sets the Daily Value (DV) for protein at 50 grams per day for a 2,000-calorie dietAt best, the medical community upped it to 0.8grams per pound of body weight, but it took awhile for it to get there.For most of America history in fact, you can look this up, it's been at most like 60 grams a day.
>>77001412>If you're a Med, yes, but ancestral diets entail you eat closer to what your ancestors consumed.I've never heard of any decent evidence towards this. I think it's just something people do because it "feels good" to pretend you're an ancient warrior or something. >I am quite literally built for itWhat do you even mean by this? Just vibes?
>>77001397Yeah, nuance is important, and these simple infographic guides can’t support it. Potatoes don’t contain free fructose or glucose. They’re mostly starch, which has to be broken down, which slows absorption and spreads out insulin production.
>>76999675They were burning down food processing plants during Brandon's admin to drive up the price.
>>77001417They are bad because SeedOils are linked to inflammation, the food additives we have in most our food products have a chemical etymology that is derived from Petroleum, and the sprays such as insecticides, pesticides, herbicides, can be carcinogenic, among many other problems:>Noooo, you have to eat Petroleum Food Products! There is literally nothing wrong with them!Tell me you huff petrol without telling me you huff petrol.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1yeBmSFkC4&list=RDs1yeBmSFkC4&start_radio=1
>>77001422>Just vibes?Genetics. It's very clear that food tolerance is passed on and is generally applicable to different genetic groups. Naturally somebody whose genetics come from South America is going to be able to handle the foods that grow naturally in that region far easier then someone from Europe. Just the same, Northern Europeans are the most lactose tolerant people on the planet, because we have been consuming it for generations, and have derived a lot of our nutrition from it, among many many other food items.Of course you could argue that the domestication of our food supply has made foreign substances more digestible, but for one this, an insane level of industrialization is needed to maintain that, and even then, you can't manufacture lactose tolerance of immunity to nut allergies, fish allergies, etc. All of these proclivities are tied to racial genetics.>https://www.nahrungsmittel-intoleranz.com/en/lactose-intolerance-worldwide-distribution/
>>77001421>but this was pretty well documented that the medical industry has been recommending low protein for awhile now.Without using clickbait news articles can you provide any proof of this? I know it's only anecdotal, but I work in a medical building the past 12 years and have only heard nurses and doctors encouraging patients to eat more protein. I know news articles like to point towards protein being carcinogenic, but thats often just mechanistic speculation from in vitro studies.
>>77001441>Genetics. It's very clear that food tolerance is passed on and is generally applicable to different genetic groups.>I can tell it's genetics and muh races and not from, you know, something as simple as average dairy food consumption starting from a young age>look at this map!
>>77001429>They are bad because SeedOils are linked to inflammationOpposite actually. >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34527059/>Our findings revealed that flaxseed oil supplementation might play a beneficial role in the reinforcement of the antioxidant defense system and amelioration of oxidative stress in adults.>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34635132/>Flaxseed intervention suggested the positive effects on lipid profiles, inflammatory cytokines and anthropometric indices in patients with dyslipidemia related diseases>the food additives we have in most our food products have a chemical etymology that is derived from PetroleumAnd? What evidence do you have the doses present cause any harm in humans?>and the sprays such as insecticides, pesticides, herbicides, can be carcinogenicWhat evidence do you have the residue(if any) are in a high enough number to cause harm to humans? Why do people who eat more produce have lower rates of cancer despite that means they are eating more pesticides?
>>77000163Muh meat is the new veganism
>>77001446Well ya, over the past 15 years or so there has been a huge push for higher protein intake.I'm refering to the FDA recomendations, which there are files for but I don't feel like downloading them, so heres a lame AI overview>For nutrition labeling purposes (which were being standardized under the new Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990), the FDA proposed a Daily Reference Value (DRV) for protein of 50 grams per day. This value was based on 10% of a standard 2,000-calorie diet and was derived from an adjusted average of the 1989 Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)>Obtain about 10% of calories from protein (with 60% from carbohydrates and 30% or less from fat)Obviously there are going to be exceptions in the medical community, but from my experience, most the medical advice my family has gotten over the past few decades have been from doctors following the FDA recommendations.>>77001447I nice sentiment chief, but exposure does not allow somebody to magically overcome their bodies inability to produce the enzymes that break down lactose. Every genetic lineage produces enzymes relative to their ancestral environment, has a unique oral and gut microbiome, all relative to their ancestral environment. It's the same reason they also have natural immunity to certain diseases in that region while foreigners do not. If you've ever traveled abroad you know that most people get some variety of vaccines or shots to immunize themselves to what occurs in that region.You're delusional if you think that somebody whose genetically from America will have an equal degree of success living in Thailand compared to the natives of Thailand.
>>77001441I mean yeah, you're more likely to not be lactose intolerant. But thats just one, and I believe the only example. I don't see any evidence on the planet that dictates that a med diet isn't one of the best diets for every ethnic group. A lot of the data on the diet comes from people following it all over the world. Your whole philosophy just seems to be that because you can handle something better, it means it's the best for you? If we're talking about overall health I just don't see how those things align and can't find any scientific evidence supporting it. Too many cultures following their ancestral diets and having shitty lifespans compared to the Meds
>>76999675My father could buy kilos of whey for like 10 euro equivalent in modern times, it was purely a waste product and now the industry is making crazy money simply because retards are gullible
>>77001458None of those studies look at high quantity of consumption or prolonged exposure, that's been the main issue with SeedOil research.Most people who consume seedoils consume an insane amount from birth, given that they're in literally all food products. And the affect that have after consuming these substances over decades.This was a topic of discussion with the Asian Groups who consume Onions Beans. For one thing, the components in Onions Beans that become Seed Oils is nowhere near the same magnitude, in seed oils they're concentrated to an absurd degree.Those studies you cited don't mention the discussion surrounding Free Radicals.I don't have all the available research, but I'll do my best to link what I can.>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5616019/>https://www.pan-europe.info/press-releases/2025/06/new-scientific-publication-confirms-glyphosate-causes-cancer-eu-%E2%80%9Csafe%E2%80%9D>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2957945/Pretty much all the food additives we could discuss are derived from Petroleum.It doesn't take a genius to see that health problems have increased dramatically the more common these substances have become.
>>77001441I can assure you that the data for the south part of latin america is wrong, everyone drinks milk and eats cheese here
>>77001477Scientific Evidence is limited in this regard because they refuse to do many studies on racial genetics, but there is plenty of research done on the differences in Disease Resistance between different racial groups, and differences in Gut and Oral Microbiomes.The bacteria we have in our bodies helps us break down food and resist the negative parts of that food, naturally the differences in microbiomes would equip us with different abilities to break down and absorb food, relative to whatever foods we find in our native environments. Obviously some universality exists, but it's pretty consistent across generations, even when removed from their native environment.And again, it is not limited to dairy, but also Nuts, Fruits, Fish, Veggies, etc.In fact we see higher rates of food allergies in Black and Hispanic groups, and these may be due to the fact that we have homogenized them within our own Diets, which have become the norm.
>>77001513And South America also has a high prevalence of Northern European Genetics due to Spanish conquest.Furthermore, even people who are lactose intolerant consume dairy, they just don't handle it as well, and that's maybe part of the reason South Americans have such shitty toilet habits and bowel movements.
>>77001505>None of those studies look at high quantity of consumption or prolonged exposureOkay how do you explain the results then? Inflammation usually happens pretty quickly after consumption. How do you explain decreased inflammation over the 8 weeks? And you presented no counter evidence so I can only assume you're just thinking with your feelings. And this is just inflammation, if you look at other things like heart disease, cancer, liver lipids and all cause mortality, replacing any form of saturated fat with PUFA improves outcomes. This is data that has been repeated all over the world and consistently over decades. >Free radicalsYes these are bad, but are only present in fried foods when the fryer isn't regularly cleaned and oil replaced. Nobody disagrees that fried food is bad. >https://www.pan-europe.info/press-releases/2025/06/new-scientific-publication-confirms-glyphosate-causes-cancer-eu-“safe”Don't know why you didn't just post the study, I'm assuming you just quickly googled. It's: >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40490737/Anyway I am very familiar with it: They chose Sprague-Dawley rats, which are notorious for getting tumors and are frowned upon for using in medical research because of this. The "Low" dose is also still way above what is considered safe for humans and not even a decimal of what is found on our food. Again ask yourself on why these results aren't repeated? Why do we have hundreds all over the world showing safety, but this one slips through the cracks?>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2957945/This is an opinion piece. >It doesn't take a genius to see that health problems have increased dramatically the more common these substances have become.Yes because these foods are often associated with obesity due to fat people eating them. Fat people have health problems.
>>77001524so why don't we see cultures that eat their traditional diet living as long and healthy as the Meds? Why does their diet work for just about everyone?
>>77001534>Northern European>Spanish
>>77001565>so why don't we see cultures that eat their traditional diet living as long and healthy as the Meds?Ever heard of the Japanese?
>>77001561>Nobody disagrees that fried food is bad. This problem does not occur the same when cooking in say butter for example, it is pretty exclusive to Seed Oils.>Fat people have health problems.Right, but fat people are also consuming higher portions of seed oil and food additive saturated foods, and these health problems are more prevalent in them now then they were before.Most of the studies you can cite that talk about seed oils do not look at the processing that most industrial oils go through, Bleaching, Deodorizing, etc. Without even needing to cite a study, how can you assume that a highly industrialized mass produced and treated substance simply has no negative effect on human consumption whatsoever? There is no historical precedent for this kind of food in this quantity.The reason your studies show a consistent bias for seed oils, is most of them measure only moderate consumption, and do not measure prolonged exposure, as mentioned.You clearly have the sources, so look at the studies surrounding excess intake of seed oils. Which most people and their modern diets, particularly American portions, consuming an abundance of.Nobody is eating seed oils in moderation, it's in literally everything.>>77001565I have yet to see evidence of this, but like I said, there are some universal premises behind diet, we all have to eat. What I'm saying is that the important variations are often overlooked in adhering to a universal diet.Why would I, a Northern European, cut out raw diary from my diet given how much good it does for me?
>>77001593The Spanish were lactose tolerant, because they were mixed with Northern Europeans to a great degree.
>>77001620I am pretty sure the north African rapebabies were the ones sent over to colonize. You're telling me they sent their best and brightest? I don't believe it.
>>77001565>so why don't we see cultures that eat their traditional diet living as long and healthy as the Meds? Why does their diet work for just about everyone?Because most of them don't eat their ancestral diet anymore, they've all been westernized to a great degree. And the ones who do eat their ancestral diets are typically Mutts, such as Indians and South Americans. A Mutt is not designed to eat a natural diet, his physiology is designed to crave nutrients from multiple parts of the world.
>>77001626They sent everyone and everything, South America is filled with the most abhorrent racial mixtures in recorded history. African, European, American, and even Asian in some places.Brazil has the highest mixed population in the world, it is essentially now in the early stages of what India was long ago.
Nobody has yet to state what the "war on protein" is.
>>77000119>Fun fact>says something which isn't fun
>>77001324>A subsidy will cause prices to go down, they just wouldn't decrease by much because meats generally have a slightly elastic consumer demand.How? A subsidy is going to do fuckall if the suppliers don't decide to drop prices, which they won't, because they actively don't want to.I really don't think you understand how the cattle trade influences farming. I guarantee you, 10,000%, that the subsidies, if any (because we still don't know what the fuck RFK is talking about in his vaguepost), will be subsidies for cattle purchases and / or upkeep, because that's the biggest cost for any cattle farmer.Injecting money into the breeder market will spike demand, maintaining end-product costs. Injecting money into the feedstock market will do the same. Both groups, especially feedstock farmers, will LOVE this because that means more profit for them especially instantly, as well as a healthier market for future sales and growth. They may even be encouraged to raise prices depending on how big of a boom there is, which leaves ranchers and (You) at square one because they'll have to raise prices to compensate, not to mention that there's nothing stopping ranchers themselves from simply pocketing the difference like in every other industry that receives a subsidy. Taking taxpayer funds and shoving them directly into your pocket is effectively an American tradition at this point to the point where the people currently running the government have done it themselves.The only way beef prices are going to go down is if we somehow completely overproduce relative to demand, which will take years as cattle require time to grow, and will only truly plateau prices as farmers work hard to limit outgoing supply and preserve margins.https://www.wisfarmer.com/story/news/2026/01/06/many-farmers-are-entering-2026-in-a-tight-spot-however-beef-still-commanding-high-prices/88036482007/
>>76999641he’s the ketoschizo isn’t he
>war on proteinMeds, immediately.
>>76999641The only thing that the new pyramid does that's good is call out ultra processed foods as being horrible
>>77001683Which the previously existing guidelines already did. Again, the old ass food pyramid hasn't been promoted by the FDA in over 20 years.
>>77001595Which is very similar to the Med diet. High veggie, fish and vegetable oil. >>77001618>Why would I, a Northern European, cut out raw diary from my diet given how much good it does for me?I'm not sayin you have to. Dairy can be healthy. But I believe that it is healthy for anyone who isn't lactose intolerant. I'm looking for something that is showing me that you a "Northern European"(cringe) is having an improved benefit from dairy than a hispanic who isn't lactose intolerant. >>77001628>A Mutt is not designed to eat a natural diet, his physiology is designed to crave nutrients from multiple parts of the world.How do you know that? Why would having two different ethnic parents prevent you from digesting certain foods? Again I have seen zero scientific evidence posted in this thread. Just vibes and feelings.
>>77001744>hispanicThe Hispanic who can digest lactose has Northern European Genetics.>having two different ethnic parents prevent you from digesting certain foods? Because your oral and gut microbiomes are going to be different, giving you different immunity and proclivities for certain foods and disease resistance.
>>77001762>Because your oral and gut microbiomes are going to be different, giving you different immunity and proclivities for certain foods and disease resistance.NTA but you're retarded. Fish is fish is fish, beef is beef is beef, plants are plants are plants. The genetics of the things that are safe for widespread human consumption are not varied enough from location to location to prompt different reactions from different people, and the chemistry that happens in your body is essentially identical from person to person. If things functioned any differently white people would die from eating sushi, black people would die from eating Indian curry, and Asians would die from eating haggis. This is unironically the dumbest fucking post I've seen so far this year.
>>77001744>Which is very similar to the Med diet. High veggie, fish and vegetable oil.You have never been to Japan, have you? They mainly eat rice together with small servings of fish/meat and vegetables. And of course they don't consume a noteworthy amount of olive oil.
>>77001618>This problem does not occur the same when cooking in say butter for example, it is pretty exclusive to Seed Oils."cooking" with seed oils is different than repeatedly frying with seed oils. The free-radicals you're concerned with only happen with repeatedly frying with unchanged oil. Also many worse problems come with cooking with butter. As I mentioned earlier, then increased risk of CVD, cancer and death. >Right, but fat people are also consuming higher portions of seed oilThey consume higher portions of EVERYTHING. They are fat people. Obesity causes disease. >and these health problems are more prevalent in them now then they were before.Be specific because I think you're just pulling this out of your ass. Which health problems are fat people suffering now that they weren't before? >do not look at the processing that most industrial oils go throughWhy would that matter? The final health outcomes is the only thing that is important. You're just citing your emotional feelings and how the food makes you feel.>The reason your studies show a consistent bias for seed oils, is most of them measure only moderate consumptionThey simply replace all of the fats they are currently eating, with seed oils. Then they see improved health outcomes. Increasing it too much would lead to inaccurate results as it would result in weight gain. Increasing too little would do the same but with weight loss. It's literally the best way to measure it. >and do not measure prolonged exposureYou're obviously just not educated on the topic. We have studies with 33 years of follow up.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2831265>look at the studies surrounding excess intake of seed oilsYes eating too much food makes you fat. Added fats make foods more palatable and easy to over consume.
>>77001772But the bacteria and pathogens that these foods naturally/potentially contain are exclusive to regions for the most part. It is well documented that different races have different immunity to certain pathogens.>https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01162/fullArticle contains multiple links to different studies on differences in microbiomes.This also doesn't apply to Nut Allergies, Shellfish allergies, Fish Allergies, Dairy Allergies.Explain to me why Northern Europeans can drink milk more than any other group of people?
>>77001776>You have never been to Japan, have you?Neither have you apparently since seed oils like Sesame and Rapeseed are commonly used. Who the fuck said anything about olive oil?
>>77001776I have several times actually. I said "similar" not the exact same. Rice, while not as good as whole grains, is similar. Sesame and peanut oil, while not as good as olive oil is similar. They both eat tons of fish, veggies, legumes. I would say the Japanese are more similar to the Meds than most other countries.
>>77001785>We have also identified the major factors responsible for geography-based alterations in microbiota; though it is not yet clear which factor plays a dominant role in shaping the microbiome—nature or nurture, host genetics or his environment. Some of the geographical/racial variations in microbiome structure have been attributed to differences in host genetics and innate/adaptive immunity, while in many other cases, cultural/behavioral features like diet, hygiene, parasitic load, environmental exposure etc. overshadow genetics. The ethnicity or population-specific variations in human microbiome composition, as reviewed in this report, question the universality of the microbiome-based therapeutic strategies and recommend for geographically tailored community-scale approaches to microbiome engineeringLiterally in the introduction. Read your source next time retard; "if you live somewhere you'll be immune to the diseases there and possess the local parasites" is the most common fucking fact on the planet.Call me when someone from Sweden dies instantly from eating a corn tortilla.
>>77001782>"cooking" with seed oils is different than repeatedly frying with seed oilsNo, heating of seed oils in general increases the presence of free radicals.>They consume higher portions of EVERYTHINGExactly, and in America they are like 50% of the population. But measuring the recent uptick in chronic disease and other health related issues, fat people are even more unhealthy now than before, because what they're eating a greater portion of is lower quality then it used to be, still bad, but worse. >Which health problems are fat people suffering now that they weren't before? More cardiovascular related issues, heart problems, increased dementia cases, anything having to do with inflammation is greater now than ever before.>The final health outcomes is the only thing that is important.Because each of these oils is treated in a way that is not natural, such as bleaching, etc, and each of these cases has negative consequences.>Increasing it too much would lead to inaccurate results as it would result in weight gain. But this is exactly the issue, people are eating it in higher quantities then the studies you're citing, the studies all measure moderate consumption, whereas the average person is consuming it in excess.>We have studies with 33 years of follow up.Measured from birth? Measured with the increase in these substances in the food supply? No, obviously not.These food additives are more prevelant now than ever before, and chronic disease is now higher than ever before, not simply due to portion size.>Added fats make foods more palatable and easy to over consume.I'm a thin 170lbs guy, I eat plenty of fats for cognitive performance and energy, and I feel better now than when I was eating seed oil slop. I ultimately don't need a study to know what makes me feel better and have more energy, and anyone who trusts their own experience aren't going to trust any degree of "Science", because science is consistently proven wrong, again and again.
>>77001796Right, but the longer your ancestry has been in a particular area, the more immunity you will have to those relevant diseases.Sure, in small food cases you can get away with eating something you're not naturally attuned for, but for longevity I'm going to keep eating what my ancestors consumed, because it is again, what I am quite literally built for.
>>77001785>Explain to me why Northern Europeans can drink milk more than any other group of people?The human body is designed to be efficient and eliminate unnecessary production. All human beings without genetic defects regardless of race create lactase from birth in order to facilitate the absorption of milk from a human mother. As babies grow and the amount of milk consumed declines, lactose production is curtailed or stopped entirely in favor of using the body's resources more efficiently.Some European populations are able to drink milk because they used domesticated cattle for raw milk harvesting and consumption, causing a genetic mutation that failed to shut off lactase production to become dominant in those respective populations due to an as-yet unknown selection pressure.It's also worth noting that the mutation that allows for continued lactase production evolved independently in places beyond Europe, with the first instances believed to have occurred around Central Europe or modern-day Turkey. Other instances of lactase production mutations include middle / west Asia and west Africa primarily in cultures with ranching practices (such as in myriad cultures in India and among the Fulani cattle drivers in Africa). It doesn't have anything to do with microbiomes.https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2012/12/27/168144785/an-evolutionary-whodunit-how-did-humans-develop-lactose-tolerancehttps://www.science.org/content/article/milk-tolerance-evolved-more-oncehttps://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-08/infographic-day-where-people-can-digest-milk/
>>77001833The microbiome argument ties into my overall argument on racial genetic variations, which do exist. However, this is some interesting info you've cited, I'll give it some consideration.Nonetheless, Northern Europeans are the most lactose tolerant people on the planet, that is a fact, and couples with myriad other genetic adaptations to their climate, it stands to reason that I as somebody descendant from these people with relatively pure genetics should adhere to those adaptations in order to optimize my health outcomes. Similarly, other individuals from other genetic groups would probably benefit from adhering to the adaptations within their own parameters.The essential argument is that if these adaptations do generally exist within a given population, then deviance from these adaptations is not likely to lead to the best health outcomes in the life of a given individual.It benefits me to learn more about the historical diet of my people, and to try it out for myself.
>>77001802>No, heating of seed oils in general increases the presence of free radicals.Zero evidence of this. Heating oils is absolutely fine up to the smoke point. >But measuring the recent uptick in chronic disease and other health related issuesWe also have better medical technology and are able to keep them alive. Yes old and fat people are more diseased than before, but that is because before they would have just died. >More cardiovascular related issues, heart problems, increased dementia casesNone of these things are new with obesity. >and each of these cases has negative consequences.Still no evidence for this. Just feelings. >But this is exactly the issue, people are eating it in higher quantities then the studies you're citing, the studies all measure moderate consumption, whereas the average person is consuming it in excess.That literally is the point. We are trying to isolate the variable despite confounders. Obesity is a confounder. In healthy people seed oils give better health outcomes. Fat people have fat people problems. There is even a study that just swaps out the fats in obese people and the seed oils once again improved their diabetes and CVD symptoms despite not changing anything else, meaning they are consuming the massive amounts of seed oils you're looking for: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11914742/ >not simply due to portion size.It's due to potion size and overeating.>I ultimately don't need a study to know what makes me feel better and have more energy, and anyone who trusts their own experience aren't going to trust any degree of "Science", because science is consistently proven wrong, again and again.Right we should just go by our feelings instead. Good idea. Also funny how you posted three scientific articles prior to help prove your point but now discredit all science as wrong when it doesn't support your bias. No substance to your claims, just emotion."well yeah maybe one day we will find out it was bad for us."
>>77001762>The Hispanic who can digest lactose has Northern European Genetics.Factually false. tons of Hispanics drink dairy and that doesn't answer my question. >Because your oral and gut microbiomes are going to be different, giving you different immunity and proclivities for certain foods and disease resistance.How do you know that though? To the point where you have an advantage over someone else eating the same food?
>>77001868>Zero evidence of this. A simple google search would suffice. Polyunsaturated fats, etc.>but that is because before they would have just died. Ah of course, I should have known you were a historical revisionist. Not that modern medicine must perpetuate this lie otherwise it would lose money.Never trust doctors, never trust swine, all they do is lie and spread disease. And of course, modern medicine comes to the consensus that seed oils are safe and completely fine, after all, they have to put a Mcdonalds in their cafeterias, right?>None of these things are new with obesity. I didn't say they were new, I said they were higher per capita now then they were before.>Still no evidence for this.Literally just a simple google search.>In healthy people seed oils give better health outcomes.People who eat seed oils in excess are not healthy, they are not recieving benefits form this. There is zero evidence to suggest this. A substance will less than 100 years of precedent magically being digestible and providing miracle elixir properties. You're delusional.>B-Bu, muh studiesYa, the studies paid for by food lobbyists and kikes?Everything you're saying is an inversion of the truth, this is why science is fake and gay.>It's due to potion size and overeating.Nobody who consumes goyslop is healthy.>Right we should just go by our feelings instead. Yes, we absolutely should. Modern medical consensus says that raw dairy is bad for you, when everyone I know who consumes it is healthier then literally everyone who does not. I cite scientific info for your sake, not for mine. My life has improved dramatically by rejecting scientific consensus.Glad RFK is in office so jews like you can stop lying and poisoning the food supply, as you have always poisoned everything since the dawn of time.
>>77001879>tons of Hispanics Because they have white genetics, hence colonization.>How do you know that though? Because I've seen it.
>>77001412Why would ancestral diet be good?Maybe those guys were happy to survive on certain foods that were attainable but never attained perfect health and died aged 50?Maybe eating a mix diet from the wider world will hit better health and longevity.
>>77001865>if these adaptations do generally exist within a given population, then deviance from these adaptations is not likely to lead to the best health outcomes in the life of a given individual.The reason why this doesn't really hold is because the genetics of any two beings of the same species on the planet are incredibly similar; human beings in and of themselves exhibit 99.9% similarity between one-another on average and 80-90% with other mammals. The fact that all life, according to current evidence, shares a single common ancestor is the reason why we can eat food (especially meat) in the first place. Because plants and animals construct cells similarly, process food similarly, and even excrete waste similarly to ourselves, we can derive nutrients from them. The nutrients needed from other living things are essentially entirely consistent across all human populations because we as a species have developed with the understanding that we can outsource key ingredients for our survival to other living beings. This is what allows us to develop higher-order traits like larger brains or the biomechanics for efficient sprinting. Things like gut biome aren't effected by food geography in the way you might think, otherwise the importation of foreign food en-masse throughout Europe's history (curry, coca, cane sugar, tomatoes, potatoes, corn, etc) would have completely devastated those populations. In fact, access to more nutrient-dense foods that were previously unavailable in certain regions often results in better health outcomes. There's a reason why all of Europe began growing a Peruvian root vegetable.If you want to rail against anything, consider railing against additives, microplastics, and soil depletion / contamination, all of which are things that are influencing your food Right Now and which will impact your health to a measurable and painful degree, unlike whether or not the fish you're eating was trawled on one side of the planet versus another.
>>77001905Because the kind of diet you're advocating is untenable without a reliance on modern globalization, and all the environmental degradation that comes with it.You can speculate on the past, ultimately they were closer to nature, and coupled with modern knowledge I think it's healthier, because my body is accustomed to those foods more than foods from some other part of the world. As mentioned, the oral and gut microbiome you have is inherited in large part from your genetics, your body adapts to the minutiae of bacteria (probiotics) and nutrition contained within a given environment, how would your body develop an immunity to something that your genetic line is not accustomed to? How could you crave something your ancestors never came into contact with? How could such a substance be healthy?>>77001914>exhibit 99.9%AI talking point, even a .00001% difference produces numerous distinctions.Just because I share my genetics with a plant doesn't mean I can simply sit in the sun all day and drink water to survive.You're failing to understand that we evolved in different unique environments, with unique pathogens, unique disease, unique struggles, etc, and we have numerous genetics distinctions to show for this.>would have completely devastated those populations.And they did, the reason the British have such fucked teeth is because of their grain diet and reliance on foreign foods. It completely fucked them, as it did everyone else.>that were previously unavailable in certain regions often results in better health outcomes.Except people are more unhealthy now than ever before. Your own argument is that the necessary compounds exist and are universal, then at the very least you should not claim that it leads to better health outcomes, because by your own logic there should be no difference whatsoever.Biodiversity already exists in every region. Humans are acclimatized to different climates, thus they should eat the foods that are naturally occurring.
>>77001914>If you want to rail against anything, consider railing against additives, microplastics, and soil depletion / contamination, all of which are things that are influencing your food Right Now and which will impact your health to a measurable and painful degree, unlike whether or not the fish you're eating was trawled on one side of the planet versus another.Many of these problems occur and are tied to modern industrialization. It's all the more reason to support locally grown food and avoid foreign imports, as imports will require some kind of industrial artifice to preserve and transport them over a long distance, you're essentially increasing your risk of food additive/microplastic exposure.
>>77001964>AI talking point, even a .00001% difference produces numerous distinctions...You're failing to understand that we evolved in different unique environments, with unique pathogens, unique disease, unique struggles, etc, and we have numerous genetics distinctions to show for this.You're missing the point. The differences that those tiny changes produce are not impactful enough to influence baseline body chemistry. Creatures with 20% differences process things so similarly to use that we can test products and pharmaceuticals on them with remarkable accuracy. A 20% genetic change still requires mice and humans to eat similar foods and avoid similar poisons. A 0.1% change is going to do far, far, far less, especially since the kinds of biological changes you seem convinced occur between human populations evolve on scales far longer than we have been a species. If this weren't the case, selection pressures would cause massive fluctuations in the animal kingdom that we have yet to observe in the wild.>And they did, the reason the British have such fucked teeth is because of their grain diet and reliance on foreign foods....What?>Except people are more unhealthy now than ever before.This is because of the aforementioned additives, soil depletion, etc. We have created food that is bad for us. Modern illnesses did not occur because Europeans started eating tomatoes and potatoes.>at the very least you should not claim that it leads to better health outcomes, because by your own logic there should be no difference whatsoever.No, because logically some foods are healthier than others—for *everyone.* Whole potatoes are better than Lays Potato Chips—for *everyone.* Eggs and organic meats are better than cereal for breakfast—for *everyone.* This is extremely conceptually simple and I don't understand how it could be misinterpreted except in bad faith.
>>77001885>never trust doctors, never trust swineHoly schizophrenic. >People who eat seed oils in excess are not healthy,christ you have like zero reading comprehension. I have explicitly stated multiple times that eating more fat(or anything) will lead to weight gain and the problems that come with it. Keeping calories the same and replacing fats with seed oils leads to better health outcomes. >just google it. No I can't provide any evidence for my claims.Lmao>Ya, the studies paid for by food lobbyists and kikes?Yeah studies from all over the world and different organizations. I'm sure they are all in on it. They are all out to get specifically you and your family. The voices are real. >Glad RFK is in officeLmao even though he openly accepts lobbyist funding? Zero standards. It's just emotions and doing what makes you "feel good". Take your meds.
>>77001865>>77001964hey anon, did you know that chickens actually come from Thailand? you should stop eating them quickly before you lose all your gains and turn into a 4'8" asian
>>76999678than live a healthy life with exercise and not posting on /fit/ like the fat fuck you are
>>77001976If you can admit that humans are adapted to their particular climates, you should necessarily be opposed to foreign food sources based on the principle of avoiding microplastics and food additives, things of which are necessary for the transportation of food across great distances.A locally grown and produced food source will be superior based on this fact alone, so I don't understand why you would be opposed to this?If your argument is to then take the foreign food sources and grow them in other climates, you clearly haven't thought through how certain plants developed to handle their particular environments, making such a notion untenable.Globalization and influx of food from foreign sources necessitates the very things you claim to want to avoid.>>77002004You rely on science to determine your reality, and thus you will always be behind the curve, because science is inherently post-hoc. How many times has science been proven wrong? They were wrong about cholesterol, they were wrong about carbs, they were wrong about cancer treatment, literally every decade they find that what they were doing decades prior was false, but like the gullible retard you are, you will always fall hook line and sinker for everything they sell you, because you never stop to develop your own sense of things, you will never trust the evidence of your own eyes.Suffice to say I don't take medical advice from Fatties and Cucks, and given that most the medical community are fat cucks, why should I listen to anything they have to say?Go to your nearest hospital, tell me how many of the people who work there are fat. Tell me if your hospital has a McDonalds inside it or near it.And then come back here and cope about how I'm a shizo and I should trust fat doctors with my life.If their research didn't work for them, why would it work for me?I will continue eating loads of saturated fats and raw dairy, and I will never stop.
>>77002019You know chickens aren't the only bird, right?I actually do try to avoid chicken and eat mostly red meat when I can, based, thanks for reminding me.
Well maybe they need to subsidize dairy a bit more. All the old farms around my hometown are being turned into houses. Slight smell of cow shit carried 5 miles on the wind is now nostalgic.
>>77002028>If you can admit that humans are adapted to their particular climates, you should necessarily be opposed to foreign food sources based on the principle of avoiding microplastics and food additives, things of which are necessary for the transportation of food across great distances.No. Food trade occurred over great distances—and in fact across both the Old World and over the Atlantic—far before the advent of chemicals and polymers. We salted food. We traded livestock and seeds. We preserved things via jars, fermentation, and other methods. This is basic world history; how do you think sugar, tomatoes, potatoes and foreign animals spread throughout the world? The reason why we use plastics today is because of greater ease and industry profit. I have full faith that humanity can figure out a way to make food transportation profitable or sustainable without microplastic and chemical contamination. Humans have come far as-is and better things are yet possible.If you want to eat solely what you think scandanavian warriors were eating, be my guest. But like >>77002019 said, you better put the chicken away.British people having bad teeth outside of royal inbreeding isn't real, by the way. You fell for something you saw in movies.
>>77002033cattle came from the middle east so you can't eat that either lol, you don't want to be an arab do you?
>>77002028>literally every decade they find that what they were doing decades prior was falseLike what? And how do you know they were wrong about those things? It sounds like you use science, you're just really bad at it. I have this feeling you just look at clickbait news articles and assume the entire scientific community flip flops every other month. >but like the gullible retard you arePal you listen to the voices in your head and online grifters. You're not a free-thinker. You're completely at the mercy of your own biases. No doctor is telling you to go to Mcdonalds. Mcdonalds likely opens restaurants next to hospitals because people tend to stay there for periods of time and can't cook for themselves. They also usually want comfort food. >why are doctors fatLikely because they work a stressful job with long hours and rely on cheap unhealthy options for food. Why are elite athletic trainers fat? My god I can't imagine living inside of your brain unable to comprehend multiple factors at once. I can only imagine you live on a farm or something in a tiny little community and can't comprehend the experiences or circumstances of others. Talk with a slow midwestern accent absolutely terrified of the outside world thinking your own shadow is about to get you.
>>77002062>My god I can't imagine living inside of your brain unable to comprehend multiple factors at once. I can only imagine you live on a farm or something in a tiny little community and can't comprehend the experiences or circumstances of others. Talk with a slow midwestern accent absolutely terrified of the outside world thinking your own shadow is about to get you.Five star post
>>77002046>No. Food trade occurred over great distancesNo, it did not. Prior to colonialism and the spice trade this did not occur, least of all to the degree it does not. It is untenable, and unsustainable.You're looking at modern gloablization (The past 1000 years or so) and using that as a baseline. The past 1000 and even 2000 years have nor been healthy. The trade that did occur prior to this was not over nearly a vast of distances.Preservation via jars and so fourth is great, but it still occurs relative to environment.>food transportation profitable or sustainableWhat about the gas required to transport it, the oil, the technology required to move vast protions to support a growing population? The metal used to building these shipping transports? What about these things are sustainable?It's trans-humanistic and absurd, all for what? You can live just fine without avocados bro, you'll be fine.>Humans have come far as-is and better things are yet possibleThere is nothing new under the sun, nor nothing we are "Progressing" towards, except more degeneracy maybe.>you better put the chicken away.I intend to, goose and duck eggs are better anyway.>You fell for something you saw in movies.This is pretty well documented that Europeans will poor teeth occur because of grain and other unnatural diets, research Weston A. Price.>>77002053Some breeds were native to Europe. Still doesn't change my premise. I will not support modern globalization, and I will grow and produce my own food. Enjoy getting fucked over by tariffs for the rest of your life.
>>77002062I have multiple family members who were fucked over by life altering surgeries that were not necessary. I will always distrust the medical community, forever, and nothing you can say or do will ever change that.>absolutely terrified of the outside world Of course you'll dismiss the growing distrust in the medical community with low IQ and shizophrenia, it's how your kind operate, by gaslighting.Surely I'm not the only one whose been fucked over by the medical industry, surely I'm not the only guy whose hospital in my home town had multiple malpractice suits for completely avoidable prescriptions, surely they told us the vaccine was completely safe and had no side effects whatsoever.I can only imagine being the soi- addicted man you are, reading over every article and posting them online to own the conspiratards, meanwhile the world is burning down around us, and it would seem increased reliance onto the systems you advocate isn't making anything any better.I'll trust my own discretion, because I'm healthy, I feel better then ever, and intend to build a healthy life for my people.Cope about it pussy.You know damn well I'm not the only one, and people like me having been popping up everywhere lately.If you keep trying to convince us by calling us retards and insisting upon the infallibility of modern medical science, you will continue to lose ground, and be outnumbered. People are sick of the lies and deception, and projecting onto us your own obfuscation isn't going to make us trust your bullshit any more.We're done.
>>77002075>Prior to colonialism and the spice trade this did not occurEven if this were true (it isn't), microplastics and preservation chemicals did not exist during colonialism. Do you think conquistadors were saran-wrapping tomatoes to take home and present to the Queen of Spain? Were peppers and basedbeans being freeze-dried on the Silk Road? Please, please, please read a history book. Any history book.>What about the gas required to transport it, the oil, the technology required to move vast protions to support a growing population? The metal used to building these shipping transports? What about these things are sustainable?The sustainability of these things and the contamination of food are two separate issues. Like I said, food trade occurred before any of these things. I believe humans can continue trading food while minimizing and maybe even eliminating ecological contamination in the future.>It's trans-humanistic and absurd, all for what?...Increased quality of living? You sound miserable. I for one love being able to eat any kind of cuisine from throughout the world whenever I want. I had some delicious hotpot just this weekend.>research Weston A. Price.You must really love duck eggs if you're quoting a quack. Sugar was the only thing he got right and you should look up the dental health of the modern British person to see how wrong he is. I know admitting you had no idea bad British teeth was a joke is embarrassing, but sometimes we trip up when tensions run high on the internet
4chan is the only place on the internet that will simultaneously proclaim the glory of the white race yet simultaneously disown and avoid 90% of its discoveries.Really makes you think.
>>77002102I agree these processes are bad, why would I support something that creates more of these problems? How do you propose feeding a growing population of 8Billlion+ people via this measure.>two separate issuesThey're the same issue, why would you support something that increases environmental destruction?What food trade are you referring to, if for thousands of years people lived in their particular climates, primitive and without the use of boats? The relatively small scale of human history you're referring to is dwarfed by ancient human history.>...Increased quality of living?Why not just grow your own food and avoid all of these issues? You have the same if not better quality of life.>I had some delicious hotpot just this weekendYou're a consoomer, you love to consoom, consequences be damned, just so long as it makes you feel good it is therefor good. I for one like having healthy bowel movements, so I would prefer to avoid Foreign poo agents.>dental health of the modern British personModern populations do have bad teeth, if their teeth are not good prior to Orthodontics and Dentisry they are not good teeth.This is the problem, you support modern industrial inventions to separate you from the consequences of your actions, you can avoid the poor teeth argument by adhering to dentistry, you can avoid the negative effects of foreign food sources by adherence to modern medicine.You want everyone to be a race of slaves to technology, simple as.
>>77002114>They're the same issue, why would you support something that increases environmental destruction?Again, unless you're going to argue that the likes of the Silk Road and square rigging were unacceptable levels of environmental destruction, we've done it before and can do it again. Are there more people now? Absolutely. Do we need to move more product now than before? Absolutely. But I believe that this is a solvable problem, even if it requires reconfiguring the market. It would be silly not to try.>Why not just grow your own food and avoid all of these issues?Because I can't grow everything I want to eat where I live.>You're a consoomer, you love to consoomNo, I was hanging out with some friends, who are Asian, and they wanted to have Asian food. It was delicious, I enjoyed it. Do you have friends? You should try having some if not. Also, my bowels came out fine, so consider seeing a doctor if this isn't the same for you.>Modern populations do have bad teeth, if their teeth are not good prior to Orthodontics and Dentisry they are not good teeth.I assume your source is >>77001964 this picture. Maybe >>77002028 this one? Anyway, if your body is so fragile you can't even have tasty Asian food I don't think what you're eating is the problem. You should fix that.
>>77002134>It would be silly not to try.Go for it bro, but I don't want it, and many other people don't either. I see no purpose in doing this if I can grow my own food, hell, even modern permaculture exists to meet both our desires.>Because I can't grow everything I want to eat where I live.It's called permaculture ^I want to live around my own people, growing my own food, and preserving my own culture/heritage. Globalization does not improve my quality of life whatsoever, it erases my identity, homogenizes me in a cosmopolitan hellscape, and then tells me I am evil for trying to exist in any other way.Globalization is for people who have no knowledge of themselves, such ignorance must not be perpetuated.
imagine having a brain so inept and small that going to an indian restaurant erases your cultural identity
>>77002174Imagine allowing Indians to take over your country because of your deeply rooted self hatred.
>>77002175i don't care or think about indians at all
>>77002187Exactly.
>>77002191>i don't think about indians at all!!>spends every day focusing on """culturally appropriate food"""lol, ok
>>77002022But I'm not fat or dyel. Rich Piana died of heart disease, he ate low protein at the end of his life to cope but it was too late.
>>77002197No, I think about the fact that our governments have imported a high density of migrants into our countries, disincentives us natives, calls us evil, and are doing everything in their power to eradicate whites.I will not support foreign substances in any capacity. Get them out of my homeland.
>>77002207>i don't think about indians at all!!>yes you do>heh........yeah, i think about them all the time actuallylol, ok
>>77002088>I have multiple family members who were fucked over by life altering surgeries that were not necessary. I will always distrust the medical community, forever, and nothing you can say or do will ever change that.Just really cringe man. Early Neanderthal level thinking. >growing distrust in the medical communityMostly from grifters to help make the wellness industry look preferable. >Surely I'm not the only one whose been fucked over by the medical industry, surely I'm not the only guy whose hospital in my home town had multiple malpractice suits for completely avoidable prescriptions, surely they told us the vaccine was completely safe and had no side effects whatsoever.>I can only imagine being the soi- addicted man you are, reading over every article and posting them online to own the conspiratards, meanwhile the world is burning down around us, and it would seem increased reliance onto the systems you advocate isn't making anything any better.Not beating the schizophrenic allegations. Holy shit what a show.
>>77001413>The general advice has been 1g/lb since before 2010.Everyone I know who I’ve told about this has been borderline scandalized about having to eat that much protein per day. It’s even worse when you tell them they should get it through clean Whole Foods and not junk food. People who don’t lift don’t think this is anywhere near reasonable.
>>77002238This is why you guys are losing the trust of the people.>"What, you don't trust life altering pharmaceutical drugs and unnecessary surgeries and numerous cases of medical malrpactice! What are you, schizophrenic?"I long for a world where we get to kill you fat fucks by feeding you to pidgeons.Obviously there is no reason to distrust modern medicine, and we should all get vaccinated. Thanks for the advice yid.
>>77001402trvkebeans greens n deens
>>76999641BUT BUT ORANGE MAN IS BAADDDD!!!!!1111
>>77001441Iceland is majority lactose intolerant? Doubtful. The only Icelandic food that tastes good is their skyr.
>>77001158Vaping and sucking cock isn't considered a food product
If he can change the goyslop wave it would be worth 100 times more measles than he's already causing, 1000 times.
>>77001678>100kg average yearly meat consumption in the west>0.27kg average daily meat consumptionAssuming 20 grams of protein per 0.1kg of meat you get a measly 54 grams of protein from meat daily
>>77003834>a measly 54 grams of protein from meat dailyThat's a perfectly okay amount for an adult who's not leaving humanity behind, and that's without all other protein sources.
