>>77055741what is this abomination?
>>77055741sucralose. they are 130 cals each. they aren't 0 cal lacroixs with 30gs of protein
>>7705574630x4=120kcalWhere's that extra 10 calories coming from?
>>77055746>aren't 0 cal lasneeds with 30gs of proteinyou cannot have protein without calories
>>77055746Literally nobody even remotely suggested that they were
Who would have ever imagined that proteinslop would have went beyond whey powder into the canned sparkling water They're going to put protein in just plain water bottles soon and call it LIQUID PROTEIN or something
>>77055741>>77055746If you can get past the sucralose, it still tastes like slightly carbonated yogurt
>>77055978>blue Raspberry lemon flavored carbonated yogurt
Catch is that the flavor isn't great, the texture is snotty, and about 50% of the protein comes from collagensource: I work in PD and we have a protein beverage client
>>77055741>no DV% on the proteinit's probably bunk protein that your muscles can't utilize
I've always thought that they should do something like protein four loko where you get booze, energy drink and protein all at once
>>77055756get the diet one you fat amerishart
>>77056350just suck off a coked out drunk finance bro in the club bathroom you fucking poof
>>77055741I have a bunch of these sitting in my fridge, the taste isn't great. I'd usually rather have food or one of the fairlife shakes since they taste just like chocolate milk
>>77055741These taste like actual vomit
>>77055741it tastes like absolute shit
>>77055741It tastes pretty good
I have not tasted it and have no strong opinionIf the other anon is right and it's useless creatine instead of proper whey it's the most pointless garbage in existence though
>>77056320Can you not calculate 30g into your goals
>>77057059What? You do know that not all protein is the same, right? If it's collagen like other anons have been saying then it's shit protein, plain and simple.
>>77057068You know you can just use Google to look up the label, instead of solving captchas to complain. Its at least 50% whey
>>77057075I don't have to because anything that doesn't show the DV% on protein labels is bunk protein. If they were marketing it as a high protein product then they'd be legally obligated to tell you how much percentage is complete protein.>Its at least 50% wheyThat's what they tell you, but it's probably much less.
>>77057080I guess you just don't know how labeling guidelines work, which is why you're spitting out nonsense. I won't argue with you.
>>77057082Not sure why you're defending this garbage, I feel sorry if you bought it. Don't waste your money next time.
>>77057084I'm sorry you've gotten so viscerally upset. Like I said, I'm not going to argue with you. Have a good day.
>>77057085What argument? You haven't said anything to contradict me.
>>77057087>>77057085
It's always people who don't do their research, who get the most angry and can never let these things go. Sometimes you just have to filter them to get through your day
>>77057092>if i dont see it then the bad words will go awaybro get your test levels checked kek
