The absolute, unquestionable truth.
>>77173567>gets outlived by Ray PeatWhat's even the point when you get death mogged by a crazy person who died the same year with 10 years on you?
>>77173567fat is essential for optimal hormone production, brainlet
>>77173657Yeah. But not eating 200+ grams of it.
it's actually really difficult to get fat by eating fat and eliminating carbs
>>77173567Pretty sure I'm fat because I'm a weak lazy retarded NEET idler hunched over a computer at 4am on a site for retards and I don't even make use of my gym membership that my parents pay for, like, it would be weird if someone had those characteristics and wasn't physically repulsive
>>77173671Easy way to lose your hair
>>77173567guess that means OP ate a faggot
>>77173567The carbs you eat is the fat you wear.
>>77174047those carbs have fat
Carbs are preferably oxidized so he's right, just dumbing it down for the masses
i tried no/very low fatit sucks super fucking hardgo ask an ai what your body needs fat for, you will be suprisedits also why this loser looked like death
>>77174074and its also why people like him need to cope with testosteronelike this freak durianrider
>>77174053worse, they have a shit ton of fructoseif you want to then look of dr richard johnsonthe metabolic switch is real
When I eat fat I can feel the bloodflow slow down in every blood vessel in my head
>>77173567If you are trying to lose weight but still be active then 100% the best diet is higher in carbs. Of course you don't want to cut protein, so that leaves fat as the fall guy.
>>77173657It's too easy to overeat fatYou should get most of your calofies from carbs and protein
>>77173661>>77174109Should I aim for 100g of fat a day on a cut?
are cheerios good for you? I been eating those to start the day cause they puffed oats which is a complex carb and I can prep and eat it in like 5 mins before work.
You should go to the gym, anon. I'm rooting for you! :)
my macros have been at least 60% fat from animal sources for 10 years now and i have a legitimately unattainable natural physique (female) for most of the population. it isn't because of my diet, the point is my physique was unchanged from eating this way. i went from eating vegetables and fruit daily earlier in my life to now rarely eating them. my diet is mostly meat and dairy. i have had several blood test over the years and my cholesterol, triglycerides and other biomarkers are extremely optimal.
>>77174848That's too much
>>77174968You're fat and you will never be a woman
>>77174882Not any better or worse than other grains
>>77173567I will believe what he says if he can deadlift 600 lbs. A strict deadlift not that sumo nonsense. If not, then his statement is invalid.
>>77173938yeah, so many bald women on that keto diet.
>>77174882No SLOP is good for you. If it was formed into a shape from a pasty sludge, all by machines covered in chemicals to prevent rust, and breakdown, should be your red flag tip off. We're all here dissecting macro nutrients but most of the time it really boils down to things in the food they DONT tell us about or explain. Like why some foods need 5 different types of sweetener. Clearly, that's not why they are in there. It's a lie. Maltodextrin is never the sole sweetener and they claim that is what it's for.
>>77175240So what's the good number if you're natty?
>>77175360Unironically, it's the most common side effect.
>>77173938>Easy way to lose your hairYeah, if you don't get your micronutrients. But eat right and you're at no risk of losing your hair. In fact a proper ketonic diet will prevent balding.
>>77175563This shit looks like it was printed in the 1900s. Might as well post one of those fliers about doctors recommending cigarettes.
>>77175563not sure if dishonest or extremely stupidnot one of these are real side effects
>>77173567This guy did a lot of good stuff, like passing laws that gave patients more rights and options when going to doctors. And he ran a clinic and improved lots of people's health, But his blanket recommendation that you should eat an extremely low fat protein restricted diet is just not a good recommendation.
>>77175654I noticed scooby eats very low fat
>>77175659He's a fraud
"The absolute, unquestionable truth": fat people are not getting fat on steak and eggs
>>77175682Yeah Definitely. It's never happened.
>>77175654I would eat his pee soup if you know what I mean
>>77175659He simply eats the minimal amount for keeping healthy hormone levelsNobody should be eating 3000 calories of fat on a daily basis
>>77175893yes, you lying cunt, obese people do not get fat by eating steak and eggswhat was their initial weight?>>77175976>him>healthy hormone levelsyeah no
cinnamon toast crunch is making my gains and my mass.
>>77176005>gets proven wrong>responds angrily with insults because poople don't agree with his magical food exclusivism.I'd ask you to post your body with a timestamp, but we all know that you won't. Hope things get better for you mate.
Even Gorge S𐐬yd?
>>77176028you deliberately misinterpreting my posts does not constitute proof of anything, except that you're a lying cunt
>>77176044>you won'tDidn't read your post
>>77175682LMAOOOOOO
You can get fat eating anything if you eat too much of it.If person A gets fat on steak and eggsAnd person B gets fat on bread, rice, junk food, etcPerson B is at risk of diabetes, and person A is not.
Would explain why I’m fat desu senpai
So if you don't eat fat you can't get fat?If I eat 20 bowls of lucky charms with nonfat milk every day I won't get fat?What is this retard even trying to say?
>>77173635>Rape EatNo way someone's mom chose that name for her kid
>>77177023I mean, that's just objectively false, but you do you.. Weight gain in general is responsible for the predisposition to diabetes, It's not really macronutrient specific. The reason people get fat is because the excess energy in their bloodstream is redistributed into esterified triglycerides, aka fat cells, because the energy goes unused. The hormone responsible for fat deposition is insulin. causing insulin to work overtime in both cases, assuming an isochloric surplus and the same amount of weight gain will predispose both.
>>77177227>"That's objectively false!">Reply has more falsehoods than truths>Weight gain in general is responsible for the predisposition to diabetes, False."Weight gain" isn't causally linked to diabetes. It's not even correlated.>It's not really macronutrient specific.Both diabetes and weight gain are macronutrient specific.Weight gain is macronutrient specific because different macronutrients are more/less difficult to overconsume due to satiety signalling, thermic variability, and speed of absorption.Diabetes is macronutrient specific because diabetes is driven by insulin resistance and beta cell failure which is itself driven by ectopic fat. It isn't as much about how many calories but how your body stores the calories. Dietary fat is very readily stored in adipose cells whereas carbohydrates, in particular refined carbohydrates and glucose are more readily stored in the liver. Fat liver leads to insulin resistance. There's also the obvious fact that when you consume sugar it immediately spikes blood sugar, and if you constantly consume sugar like most people, you have more strain on your ability to regulate blood sugar. More strain = more failure.>The reason people get fat is because the excess energy in their bloodstream is redistributed into esterified triglycerides, aka fat cells, because the energy goes unused.Yes. And if that fat gain is adipose tissue it doesn't increase risk of diabetes. There's something called metabolically healthy obesity. The argument I'm making is that fat and protein are less likely than carbohydrates to contribute improperly stored fat, which leads to dramatically reduced incidence of diabetes.Are you just ignorant of the fact that diabetics are cured using fasting mimicking diets that completely cut out carbs? Have you never been around a diabetic that can't fucking handle themselves around carbs and just has to consume them like a dumb animal?
>>7717545150g is easily doable, “natty” has nothing to do with it nigga On a cut I did 200g protein, 300g carbs, 50g fat, and that came out to 2450 cals. With working out 3-4x a week, I was able to cut bodyfat and maintain strength (195-180 pounds @ 6’1)
>>77177334What were you eating?
>>77177495Mostly chicken breasts and rice, protein shake after a workout, Greek yogurt before bed, maybe OJ and a cliff bar before a workout (for the carbs)The most fat I’d get for the day would come from eggs. 100g can be the upper limit of fat, but that’s 900 calories, a massive amount for a cut. Tbh during clean bulks I’ll target 100g fat. In a cut you should target 50-70 maximum
>>77177890Chicken and rice is slave diet slop. All that shit you listed is. You eat like a retarded peasant.
>>77178016what do you eat?
>>77178018Beef, lamb, venison, salmon, sardines, eggs, dairy, rarely uncured pork
>>77177890Thanks man. Seems like I was always overeating fat.
>>77177890Based post
>>771756540 micronutrientslittle to no macrosnot a single ingredient that can be described as "good food"cant even be arsed to pretend that it doesn't taste like cancerNice fridge mode roidtrany btw
>>77178814post physique
>>7717484830% of your calories or less should come from fat.
>>77178814>0 micronutrientswe spotted the faggot pajeet
>>77177299liver fat comes from fructosediabetes, like most disease, can be cured by oatmeal
>>77173567Not exactly.from experience. Refined carbs are the real evil, natural fat is just a side kick.If you eat natural fat without carbs you ll never get fat, But the opposite you get less bodyfat.In the other way, if you eat refined carbs along with fats or even without, your insulin resistance is fucked and you gain weight a lot easier.
