>>77177399No
>>77177415/thread
>>77177399angus barbieri did a 382 day fast
feel like you'd permanently fuck your metabolism doing that. I just did a 4 1/2 day
>>77177399dry fast, i.e. neither drinking nor eating? No, you'd die.Water fast, i.e. just not eating but still drinking water?Yes, has been done by quite a few people
>>77177399Yes. First IRA hungerstriker died after 59 day fast.
>>77177399yes provided you arent a skelly at the startppl dont think Jesus could do a 40 day fast but MR BEAST almost did a 30 day fast. you would feel awful from the second week on but yeah the average person could probably survive
Why the fuck would you? Just lose weight the normal way instead of like a retard. All good things take time
>>77177605>Why the fuck would you?autophagy
>>77177426his trick was that he also ate during it>>77177480wtf i check it out and they died really fast. either people had very low body fat back then or the body is really shit at burning fat. you would need something like 200 g of fat to cover your calories yet these people died in 40-60 days, that would be way less than 12 kg of fat with all the muscle and stuff burned away too
>>77177732>his trick was that he also ate during itYou're a fucking retard. He had some fucking YEAST for the micronutrients. At no point did his caloric intake exceed what his BMR would have been. Even current modern day fasting regiments allows for minimal caloric intake so long as it is from the right sources and won't interrupt ketosis or autophagy.
I water fasted for 18 days. It is possible to go 40 but I don't see the point frankly.
