I kinda start to worry again. I see shitton of young people getting some really nasty shit despite for some cases doing everything right. According to "science" risk in a lifetime is 40-50% so pretty much 50/50 chance you get it or not. Anything you can do beside basics bros? I don't smoke because I have pretty jewish mindset about wasting money on stupid shit, rarely drink etc. Anything else?
>>77180834Vaxx status?
>>77180834You can't really avoid it. The environment is polluted, food is full of artificial crap, microplastics everywhere. And even if you had a perfect lifestyle on some remote island with organic food away from any industry etc. you can still get cancer because of your shit genes. Just try to live as healthy as you can and get regular checkups (like colonoscopy etc.) and don't worry about things that you can't really control. If you do get one it's a disease to be treated and not a death sentence, and you'll die anyway eventually. Don't stress over it.
>>77180843Never took it, I was too lazy to get out of home and actually get it, I preffered to play vidya, reading and doing push ups/pull ups at home
>>77180834>Ivermectin cycle for 2 weeks>cancer is goneWow so scary
>>77180870I know anon but the thought of withering away, seeing yourself weaker and weaker, especially if you have someone that you need to take care of, it's scary shit.
>>77180874It doesn't work I think, pretty much a myth that it works. Some people used it as desperation and died anyway.
just believe in quantum immortality and you’ll never die. works for me. let the suckers in your past universe deal with your corpse lmfao
>>77180834>According to "science" risk in a lifetime is 40-50%you should've read further...if you don't have any risk factors, which include>smoking>drinking alcohol>excessive sunbathing>genetics (mostly skin or breast cancer)>eating a lot of UPFs>being sedentarycancer risk is substantially lowerassuming a male born in Europe in 2000 into middle to upper socioeconomic environment, living healthy and with a life expectancy of ~80yoyou're looking at>~30-35% lifetime cancer riskbut age matters A LOT>~2% cancer risk for the first 50y of your lifemost of your cancer risk will be with >70yo because of age related mutations / defectsand 50-69 age group is where bad life decisions get you the most, after 70 almost everyone goes to shitand why the fuck would you worry about being 70yo nowuntil then there surely is some miracle genetic therapy that will heal meso whatever
>>77180834Is this board full of actual femoids right now?
>>77180874Legitimately what drives someone to write stupid bullshit they know its false?
>>77180834Fasting has appeared as cancer prevention and cancer treatment all over Youtube the past two years and this snacking and eating out culture in the modern world is the opposite of that.
>>77180834You're being a hypochondifag. Stop
>>77181545I know anon, but sometimes when I hear of some fucked up cases especially around me, I start to hypochondifag a lot. I have a problem that I cannot easily remove some thought from my mind sometimes. Working on it as we speak.
>>77180834Yeah but that includes like skin cancer, which is extremely preventable and treatable.Prostate cancer can be detected really early by a blood test.You can lie to your doctor and say you have a family history of colon cancer and get a colonoscopy as young as you want. If you already have it, then you do what you have to do to get rid of it, but if you have polyps they can just take them out no problem and spare you cancer later.Testicular cancer you need to feel your balls often for lumps and get it checked out if anything feels off.Cancers like pancreas or brain tumors are more of a wildcard and somewhat rare.But if you don't bitch out on the ones you can prevent/avoid/treat then you cut your risk WAY down.
>>77180834Why are people so obsessed with cancer specifically? There's plenty of other diseases with even worse prognosis and treatment options, and they aren't much rarer either. You are more likely to die of heart disease. >50/50 chance you get itThere's 100% chance you die, why does cancer in particular worry you? It's not the worst way to die.
>>77180834In the end, it's genetics. Healthy living helps, but you could live like shit and never get anything or be a top athlete and get the worst cancer ever. It's a lottery of shit. Nothing to be done about it. I find comfort in knowing that it's one of the most researched diseases out there, and for every year that passes we are closer to finding a cure.
>>77181966>It's not the worst way to die.Are you actually retarded? It might not be THE worst, but it's absolutely up there.
>>77180834Detection or what they call "screening" is advancing and because "nobody really knows what it is", so many people who get tested will have some level of cancer.Treatment options are getting better. What you need to watch out for the most:1. Family History 2. Risky work (chemicals, radiation, etc)3. Visible symptoms and chronic pain
>>77181150based
>>77181966As someone who watched his Mom pass away by Lung Cancer at age 59, it certainly is an incredibly shitty and painful way to die.
>>77180834You're gonna die anyway. Don't worry about it. Don't actively poison your body and do a bit of intermittent fasting to give your cells a rest to fix any broken proteins.
>>77180834cancer is caused by parasites and toxins. chlorine dioxide protocols are the cure.
>>77181196Studies show it stops cancer you retard
>>77182102Sorry for your loss, anon, but death is unpleasant in general, have you actually seen the other ways people die to compare? I work in a hospital and see people die often, I'd pick cancer over stroke/alzheimer/congestive heart failure with no hesitation.
>>77181196>Big pharma shill PETRIFIED that cancer can be cured for under $5
>>77180834This might be of interest to you.>>>/pol/532088501
>>77182419I'm sorry but you're scientifically illiterate man. That whole document is just quotes which A) can be substantiated by any "significant" difference made, even if it's a 0.00001% change and B) the writers of the paper are incentivized to say so that they can get published.ALWAYS go straight down to the numbers/graphs, and take a look at the methods. Huge difference between a clinical study administering vitamin C and gigablasting cancer cells with it in a petri dish.
>>77182608>I'm sorry but you're scientifically illiterate manSaid by guy who didn't read a single one of the studies but types his meaningless opinion anyways
>>77180874>>77181106>>77181196my baby niece had cancer and the docs wrote her off as having to need major parts of her body removed for maybe surviving. i handed my brother in law a dozen tubes of literal horse paste, showed him to get more at tractor supply, and told him to keep his mouth shut around the docs. two months later the same doctors were all jerking themselves off over "their" miracle treatment that cured her without needing to gut her. too bad they don't know about the ivr, actually, they're going to give some other kids the same treatment they thought is a miracle and they'll end up dying painfully.
>>77180834>Do you have the cancer gene>Did you piss it offThe game
>>77182419>brilliant article>It's a fucking blog postlmao>In-vitro>In-vitro>In-vitro>In-vitroLiterally worthless. millions of things cure cancer in vitro but have zero impact on actual humans. You know this as well as I've seen people debunk this stupid fucking picture before. Yet you still post it. Kill yourself
>>77183286>guiz they totally debunked it before but i just cant explain itShalom rabbi
>>77180834The general population risk is about 0.5% per year, but the risks of specific cancers are heavily modified by both genetics and environment; however generally increase somewhat with age. BromAC is the broadest-spectrum experimental OTC chemo cocktail that is safe for prophylactic use, afaik. There are lots of others with narrower efficacy.>t. eats generic bromelain and NAC pills among many others>>77183183dewormers don't always work, picrel. getting genetic sequencing on an active cancer is the best way to find targeted chemos beyond the SoC.
>>77183429I did explain it. In-vitro studies are almost worthless and hardly ever transfer over to human studies. Otherwise you would be posting human studies, but you're not because you know it doesn't actually work.
>>77183515>I did explain it. In-vitro studies are almost worthless and hardly ever transfer over to human studies.Uh, only if there is no bioavailability data on a substance and/or it's a non-human study with no target protein conservation data; if in vitro research is so worthless, why does anyone do it?
>>77183595Have you researched DMSO? Seems like underrated compound. It can be taken orally. MSM is one of it's metabolites. Found this article recently: https://www.sott.net/article/228453-DMSO-The-Real-Miracle-SolutionHas confirmed life-extending properties too: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20828537/
>>77183651>Have you researched DMSO?It's my favorite (0.1%) topical carrier for fisetin because it solubility-mogs errything else, but color me a little skeptical on its safety for oral systemic use at decently high doses, especially long-term.>Dimethyl Sulfoxide Damages Mitochondrial Integrity and Membrane Potential in Cultured Astrocytes>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107447protip: yes, those are way higher doses than you'd hit eating vaguely reasonable quantities
>>77183682>color me a little skeptical on its safety for oral systemic use at decently high doses, especially long-term.This guy was the most prominent researcher of DMSO and used in in very large quantities and lived to 91.Ray Peat acknowledges DMSO in the following way: "Email response from Ray Peat regarding DMSO Feb 24 2016I got interested in it in 1965, after reading about Stanley Jacob’s ideas, and experimented with it occasionally over the next several years. I was interested in its effects on cell water, stabilizing it in a way that reduces some kinds of inflammation. It seems to accelerate some enzyme reactions. I later started to think about its own chemical properties, rather than thinking of it as just a solvent. It isn’t stable in the presence of water, and the odor seems to indicate the degree of its decomposition. It occasionally helps slightly with joint pain, but it can cause intense skin reactions, rashes; I think some of its effects depend on the breakdown products. People often forget that it has an intrinsic oxidative effect when they are thinking of it as just a solvent, to transport drugs. I saw a product sold as eye drops, consisting of vitamin C and glutathione in DMSO. Each of those reductants, in the presence of DMSO, immediately breaks down into other substances, and the composition changes continually over a long period. There has been very little investigation of the actual composition of solutions of DMSO with other substances. At least some of the mixtures will produce sulfite and metabisulfite, which are very allergenic for some people. Small amounts are probably harmless; even large amounts seem harmless for some people. Its ability to release histamine and nitric oxide and to inhibit cholinesterase (articles below) suggest that its use shouldn’t be prolonged."
>>77183515There are many people that did it themselves and cured their own cancers, youre just a brainwashed NPC midwit
>>77180870
>>77183691>This guy was the most prominent researcher of DMSO and used in in very large quantities and lived to 91.Well, n=1. I had an uncle who didn't use DMSO and lived to 94. Maybe the researcher would have lived to 87 or 97 without it, little hard to say for sure, besides it didn't *acutely* kill him.
>>77183450she was receiving chemo treatments and it was only getting worse, after the chemo was when they said they were going to have to start chopping her up, come back in three weeks and prepare for the worst. right when she got back from that was when i gave the dad the tubes, and when they went back after the three weeks OMG it's a miracle the tumors are shrinking. for the next little over a month all they treated her with was diet and some standard medication, the whole time taking ivermectin unbeknownst to the docs. after two months of it even the inflammation from dying cancer cells was gone. also mom was giving her soursop a little after starting the ivermectin, which likely helped as well. i don't need to be a researchscientistfag performing some study to see with my own eyes traditional treatments were killing her and when she received an alternative treatment, one the docs would have most definitely tried to stop, she was cured in two fucking months. Then the docs patted themselves on the back for it. cancer doctors are worse than cancer.
>>77183450oh shit, yeah also they did do a genetic sequence on her right away and picked her poison based on that.
>>77180834>Is cancer really that common?Yes. It's the second leading cause of death after heart disease, which is almost entirely self inflicted through poor lifestyle choices, and both are leagues higher then medical error, the number three cause. Everything else is an order of magnitude or more lower; basically inconsequential. If you take care of yourself and don't die of obesity, then, statistically, you will die of cancer. That's not to say you should fear it; you're going to die eventually. Just eat right, exercise, and try to live a healthy and full life.
>>77184585>>77185348Despite what chemodoomers say, the survival rate for all cancers should be approaching 100% within a few decades.Turns out Vitamin B3 is even an effective adjuvant for chemo in the deadliest kind: https://scitechdaily.com/can-a-common-vitamin-fight-the-most-aggressive-brain-cancer/
>>77180834>Is cancer really that common?Yes, it occurs daily in your body, but most of the time your immune system is strong enough to kill it.>I see shitton of young people getting some really nasty shit despite for some cases doing everything right.People saying that they do everything right and them doing everything right are two completely different things.Out of those who claim to do everything right 95% are talking shit.
