How come bodybuilders in the old days didn't lose their hair. Now everyone does.
>>77218571Wigs
>>77218571A lot of them did. Mike Katz was balding hard
The shit they took was tame compared to the chemistry set bodybuilders use nowadays.
>>77218581only thing that matters is test, which is what they took then and now.
>>77218571High volume instead of high intensity
>>77218571What's really gay is that they started shaving their bodies.Nigger, you aren't an olympic swimmer, your body doesn't need to be aerodynamic to pose.
>>77219155The volume they do now has nothing on "golden" era volume
>>77218610Except they didn’t take test. Watch old interviews: they all thought test was a “dirty” drug. Everyone took dbol and primo in those days. They all went to the same doctor in LA for it, too.
>>77219432its to show off muscles and mog
>>77219533Thats pretty assbackwards, even for then.
>>77219556Not entirely. They were using dbol as the test “base” in the stack. The primo was the more explicitly anabolic drug. Still, major crash without serious tapering off.
>>77218571Does anyone else think that this degree of competition leanness is superior to todays 2-3% graininess? Its just a bigger, better look. Healthier, more robust. I agree, Arnold looks better, but do we really need sharper conditioning than Arnold here? Maybe this is why these two boomers are still alive and healthy? All the diet drugs for cutting are unhealthy as fuck. Test, dbol, deca and primo just arent that poisonous.
>>77218571Arnold in that photo literally has a receding hairline.Also the ones winning shows were less likely to be bald purely because the ones picking them to win didn't want bald champion mr olympia or mr universe or mr america winners.Countless experienced hairloss the issue that no one even knows they existed.
