[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1732411148902.jpg (303 KB, 1065x919)
303 KB JPG
powerlifting seems cool at first because you assume it's about becoming as strong as possible
but then you get into it and learn that it's actually the exact opposite, you're just maximizing gimmicks to become as specialized as possible in the one rep max for your squat bench and deadlift to optimize your totals in competitions
in reality the best way to actually get strong is to continuously make progress in your working sets
not just peaking your sbd total, but increasing your base strength in every possible movement through the development of muscle mass
peaking is largely a neurological gimmick to give you temporarily enhanced performance in specific movements, but this has barely any carryover at all to your overall general strength
going from being able to bench 185 for 5 at any random point in time for your working sets to being able to be ch 225 for 10 at any random point in time for your working sets through years of building muscle is more valuable than going from benching 205 for 1 to 275 for 1 then decaying down to 210 for 1 three months later after a 12 week peaking program
powerlifting has deceived many into pursuing false progress
myofibrillar hypertrophy will always provide the greatest value
>>
but 99% of powerlifters dont do competitions and they are much stronger then bodybuilders, so.. why do you care that some people like getting stronger so they say they are "powerlifters" and some people like looking better so they say they are "bodybuilders"
>>
>>77238706
>99% of powerlifters dont do competitions
then they aren't powerlifters
>>
>>77238706
>99% of powerlifters are much stronger then bodybuilders
coming back to op's observation, doesnt that depend on how you measure strength? they'd probably have better 1 rep maxes in some movements assuming you accept a limited ROM, but what about the total weight moved, or capacity to work over a longer period like a work day? how about bodyweight movements?
>>
until ROM is part of competition lifting isn't a sport
>durrr I lifted 500 lbs 1" I win
mcfucking kys
>>
>>77238704
true
>>
>frog post
>its bad and wrong
>>
>>77238709
>If you powerlift in your rural home gym and nobody is around to hear you scream, then have you really done anything at all?
>>
>>77238706
powerlifters are not stringer than bodybuilders mr dyel.
power=/=strength
>>
>>77239418
>powerlifters
>power
huh?
>>
>>77239466
when you powerlift you are using power
>Power in muscles refers to the ability to exert force in the shortest period of time, which is crucial for activities requiring quick and explosive movements. This involves a combination of strength and speed, allowing muscles to produce higher velocities against a given load.
>>
>>77238704
>powerlifting seems cool at first
no it didnt
>>
>>77239468
that's weightlifting
>>
>>77238706
>99% of powerlifters dont do competitions
Retard
>>
>>77238797
strongman seems like the best way to measure general strength, but for general strength, i'd still value bodybuilding working sets over sbd 1 rep maxes
the more i learn about peaking the more it seems like a useless gimmick
you can have insane performance in a single movement pattern and then be relatively weak everywhere else
meanwhile a big guy is foundationally strong in every movement purely through having more mass
if you don't plan on competing in powerlifting, hypertrophy training seems to be infinitely more valuable
less injuries, more muscle mass, greater general strength
i have been deceived, powerlifting is not what one would assume it is
>>
>>77238704
>you get into it and learn that it's actually the exact opposite, you're just maximizing gimmicks to become as specialized as possible in the one rep max for your squat bench and deadlift to optimize your totals in competitions
And that's not "getting as strong as possible" how ? You realize that in competitions you have to lift more weight than everyone else
>But muh 2-3 webms that get reposted since a decade ago of back arching
Ok and ? Go watch non heavyweight IPF then not your backwater flyover shithole meet
Fucking midwits every single person on this board.
>>
>>77239832
You're just coping. You'll never be a "big guy" without doing some 1rm work. All your favorite roidtranny big guys max out and do periodization all the time, or at least used to before the phil heath era
>>
Also "peaking". Just because you've specialized for a few weeks doesn't mean the adaptation will fad away the moment you go back to smaller capacity.
Do you realize 60%+ of the programs out there have absurd volume and frequency that makes bodybuilding 3x10-12 look high intensity low volume, which is what filters noobs to just stick to 5/3/1 or 5x5 ?
I dont know where this idea that powerlifting only relies on the extreme ends of intensity comes from. Doubles and singles arent something you do regularly unless you're on steroids or mentally ill enough to run some bulgarian program
>>
>>77239835
roid rage
take some ais
>>
>>77241665
>Gets destroyed and exposed as a non lifter
>Quick pull up the one liner
>>
>>77238943
/thread
>>
>>77238704
>powerlifting seems cool at first

stopped reading
>>
>>77239835
>And that's not "getting as strong as possible" how ?
peak strength is a gimmick, only base strength is reliable
>>
>>77239837
one rep maxes are not necessary for hypertrophy
3-8 rep high intensity sets is best
powerlifting performance != real life strength
>>
File: 1777661686251471.jpg (29 KB, 480x360)
29 KB JPG
There's no point in powerlifting or doing any other sport if you end up looking like shit (no six pack is the simplest of examples).
>>
>>77242030
Post six pack



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.