>This was considered an amazing physique for a man in his early 20s to have back in the 2010sThat's why the copers that keep saying that Clav looks "natty" sound so fucking dumb, THIS is what an in shape natty physique actually looks like on a 21 year old man.
>>77240249This is actual ottermode, btw. Before that term was corrupted to the point where retards now think it means "at/beyond the natty limit"
>>77240271Because so many people use drugs now, we forget what an actual good physique looks like and how long it takes to get. Someone will lie to you that you can look like this in a few months (maybe on a cycle lol) but chances are it will likely take a typical skinny fat dyel 4channer YEARS of natty lifting and dieting to even look close to this.
I'll help you out OPNo one aside from men into lifting care about that guys body.
>>77240279Not everyone starts from zero muscle mass and zero sports history. Some people start when they are younger. If youdid sports in high school/college you will have had weight training coaches and knowledge. Dyels in here think they know how to lift but cannot grow muscle so instead of learning the correct way you find excuses while continuing to do the same shit that never worked for you because you are dumb and arrogant, a lethal combo.
>>77240249>This was considered an amazing physique for a man in his early 20s to have back in the 2010sStill is.
victim weight little bitch
>>77240249It wasn’t considered an amazing physique. He’s a vampire. Chill
>>77240249Don't you understand it's all cyclical? A bunch of actors in the 50s/60s were mogging those twinks into oblivionthen there was the roiding era of the 80s, with Arnold Stallone and the expendables bunchThe 90s and 00s went back to a more slim, nonchalant physique, even with womens (Kate Moss took the place of the 80s fitness broads)The outlook on physicality keeps changing and reverting back
>>77240568>it's all cyclicalKek
>>77240249Yes. Just don't be fat. Be below 15% bf
>>77240249This guy core-mogs Clav, but obviously doesn't hit arms that much. Not the "natty limit" or w/e unless genelet.>>77240619>Just don't be fat. Be below 15% bf"Just don't be fat" can't get you frame-mogging at 18BMI. And going below 8% is also bad, plus a little over 15 can still look alright, just not too far.
>>77240619Funny how "just not be fat" is so important yet we tell guys starting out they should get fat.
>>77241305Getting to 20% bodyfat in the process of building a whole bunch of muscle is not a big deal. It is very easy to shed in short order and then you are cooking
kino physique
>>77240271Actually the original ottermode is much skinnier and would be considered DYEL/skeletal today. Physique inflation is real and /fit/ is responsible for it.
>>77240291Post body then.If it's so easy to look like this, why doesn't anyone look like this?
>>77241305Powershitting ethics vy fitness ethics. You can't have both.
>>77240249This physique isn't even natty. His abs were painted on the entire movie because he couldn't be bothered to lose weight for a role he hated.But yeah physique inflation is ridiculous.
Face/hair>height>frame/muscles.Always has been.Balding makes you a <5/10 automatically in 99% of cases.
OP's full of shit, this was the same movie that had everyone frothing at the gash over pic rel which he probably did roid for given the deflation in the sequels but is completely achievable natty.
>>77240249being lean means you mog 50%+ of americans
>>77240249that's still a good physique today. people like OP are just brainwashed to believe otherwise, stop being a retard
but obviously his face elevates the physique 10x, if you have a good face you really don't need more than picrel
>>77241865i remember no one rly cared about edward, they just thirsted after this guy, they didnt even care he was 5'7 or whateverinflation is a bitch
achivable by just cycling with a mountain bike and calisthenics. definitly natural
>This was considered an amazing physique for a man in his early 20s to have back in the 2010s
>>77241877>they didnt even care he was 5'7 or whateverThey did when they learned how short he actually is.
>>77241507I'm in the process of this but food looks like heroin to a heroin addict to me right now.I give in to cravings so easily, it's ridiculous. Fully aware but no control. And only 20% bf. I cannot imagine what it's like for real fatties
im 183cm, what weight am i looking ato to resemble this mode?
>>77240249Let me guess you need “more” to slay?
>>77241982185
>>7724198212 stone
>>77240249No, it's not. It's a teen movie. Also, the other fag is was the ine with the "impressive" physique.
>>77242068Post body
#teamjacob#manlets4lyfe
>>77242074
>>77240249too hairy.
>>77242068 he is like 5'3 and isn't the other guy like 5'10- 6'?
>>77242219Okay, and? Nobody gave a shit about Edward's physique. Jacob was the body guy.
>>77240249>>77240271I kinda look like this, my chest, arms, traps and shoulders look bigger, but my abs aren't as defined. I can also do 15 strict pull-ups in a row, but I don't think i look strong at all.>6'3">185 lbs
>>77242219yeah, he got mogged by girls for it
>>77240717his abs are literally painted on via makeup
>>77243006>his abs are literally painted on via makeup...and he *STILL* literally core-mogs Clav.
>>77241956People forget man. His career literally plummeted into the ground the instant girls realized he was a manlet. He was like the most famous guy on earth before
>>77240249A powershitter made this thread
>>77243219samefag response
>>77241818They just parrot what other people hear, but yeah we all see people that go to the gym for years and don't look anywhere near as good as this.
>>77241965It's actually brutal. Unless you're one of those people that doesn't get hungry or take supplements to not get hungry it's difficult.
>>77242068This isn't that much size, the bicep veins do a lot of hard carrying.
>>77240249Still is tho
>>77240249Bruh, I have been working out for half a year and I am 35 and I have bigger natty muscles than that. This is hardly some natty peak.
>>77240279>chances are it will likely take a typical skinny fat dyel 4channer YEARS of natty lifting and dieting to even look close to this.Are you fucking high? Most people can do 1/2/3/4 in less than a year starting at a baseline of 0 experience
>>77241815/fit/ has zero cultural relevanceInstagram and fake natties caused physique inflation
>>77243732>1/2/3/4 in less than a yearMaybe if they played sports decently well before liftingThe average guy will take more than a year
>>77243735No dude. Just eat more food. Eat lots of protein, all throughout the day, whey in morning and casein at night. Take creatine. Work out 3 times a week. Do the stronglifts 5x5 routine from the sticky. It's entirely doable from a starting point of couch potato.I started with just the bar, then added 10 pounds a week (sometimes more) until I got to about 0.5/1/2/2.5 which took like a month or a month and a half, something around there. Then I started adding 5 pounds a week until I got to 1/1.5/2.5/3.5 roughly thereabouts (took about 3-4 months), then added 2.5 pounds a week for the final push. This involved a lot of clenching my ass and shouting from effort, but it was doable.
>>77243759(When I say 10 lbs, 5 lbs, 2.5lbs, I mean per side of the barbell, so in reality double that)
>>77240249This was never considered an amazing anything, I pretty much looked like that after like 3 months of natty lifting. Hell I looked almost like that while not lifting at all and living off of junk food at 29 years old (When I started lifting)Faggotvular looks awful for someone that's taking roids, he gets mogged my natties left and right and the only valid reasons for not taking roids as if they were water is because of the possibility of them aging and destroying your appearance or making you become aged quicker than you otherwise would have been.I'm so tired of people posting noodles and saying shit like "this is your natty limit" or "this physique requiere 7 years of harcore roiding".
>>77243776>Hell I looked almost like that while not lifting at all and living off of junk food at 29 years old (When I started liftingThis is truer than you realize. OP's pic has fake abs painted on.
>>77240249>This was considered an amazing physique for a man in his early 20s to have back in the 2010sIt still is. Women don't actually like meatheat gym rats. They like this.
>>77243576It's a movie aimed at tweens, not faggots.
We should try and organize a new system of body type naming based on objective measurements (neck, chest, waist, height, weight, body fat, etc.)
>>77240286Woman that dont lift here. I love his body, youre an incel
