https://strengthlevel.com/strength-standards/bench-pressI can hardly do 110 after 2 years of training. Not to mention that as a 260 lb weight the site says I should be lifting 190I need to mention I do all my bench pressing without spotter so that is the actual weight I can lift
>>77244097110lbs after two years isn't great, but also, don't go by "averages" on the internet. There's nothing on the site to say, but I'm fairly sure that here, "bodyweight" only accounts for lean mass. Fat isn't moving anything.
>>77244097BruhI went to the gym at the age of 17, my weight was 114lbs. Shat myself benching 55lbs. In 15 months I was already 168lbs and benched 190*5. You are just weak and don't eat enough
>>77244097what exactly *were* you training that landed you a 110 lb 1RM bench after 2 years?you wouldn't happen to be an australian, ethnically mediterranean, around 35-40 years old and with a history of gender identity issues, would you?
>>77244113>bodyweight" only accounts for lean mass. Fat isn't moving anything.Are you stupid lmao
>>77244097That website says 217 lb for intermediates, but I’ve only seen a handful of people benching two plates or more. Around 95% are below that.People just write bullshit there.
>>77244097your fat gut isnt big enough. Fatter gut = more magical strength powers
>>77244097>>77244113>>77244195https://strengthlevel.com/strength-standards/lat-pulldown/lb180lb - intermediatePeople who wrote this bullshit won't be able to even budge 180lb lat pulldown. Never seen anyone doing more than 140lb x 10.
>benching 0.42xBW after two yearsyou may have the worst genetics on /fit/
>>77244187L M A O
>>77244097You have to adjust using your bmi. If you're a fat ass at 260 of course a 190 orm is a lot. Once you adjust to see what your weight would be at 10-15%, that number would probably at least cut in half. Also the fuck you mean you cant do 110 bench after two years, read the fucking sticky.
>>77244244It's like that Indian pajeet on YT, who ate 25g of protein/day
>>772442583 sets of goofing around for 2 years probably
>>77244265Protein doesn't matter for strength
>>77244188Are you fat lmao
>>77244276Please go on and explain in great detail how millions of people worldwide (according to the websites number of inputs) will be counting their "lean mass" (bones, water weight, muscle, edema and a variety of other things) separately from their fat, in relatively accurate fashion just to post it on a peacocking register.
>>77244270Back to school...oh sorry u r, probably, American and never had biology at school.
>>77244279They don't count. You are a fag for counting nutrients and not getting results anyways
>>77244286So what you're saying is you're awfully wrong and admit that bodyweight in this context is the absolute body mass and weight as in what the scale shows.
>>77244293I'm another person, who wrote you about going to gym at 17.Your issue is being obese. Formulas don't work with people who are sick.
>>77244296You're extremely far gone if you think I'm OP and im inclined to believe not much time have passed since you've been 17.
>>77244097Website doesn't sort for roids and height.
>>77244097If true, eat more protein and get your testosterone checked. Anything below 600 ng/dl is low. If low, start taking enclomiphene to make your body produce more test. Kimera Chems has great quality for reasonable prices.
>>77245081Testosterone levels dont matter.
strengthlevel.com uses natty numbers only. roidbeasts are even higher
