[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.77252941
File: IMG_5933.jpg (396 KB, 1077x1077)
396 KB JPG
 No.77252941 Archived
Why are most strength and conditioning coaches against the concept of microloading?
>>
Anonymous
 No.77253005
 No.77253005
Novices can progress just as well without it, intermediate/advanced peeps can't hit true rms consistently, 5rm you did today might not happen next week if intermediate/advanced so you need to change percentages and lifts and micro loading becomes meaningless in the context. You can't microload your way to 300kg squat.
>>
Anonymous
 No.77253024
 No.77253024
>>77252941
Just do an extra rep? But I don't think strength coaches who want to get their clients to a bigger 1RM are actually against microloading.
>>
Anonymous
 No.77253126
 No.77253126
>>77252941
I've been micro loading my dips by 125g plates. It's now 33kg*reps with very good form, much lower than parallel.
Same with pull-up and chinups. 18.5kg *8reps without any swings
>>
Anonymous
 No.77253176
 No.77253176
Pavel suggests making jumps of 20 lbs
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.