The one that makes you DYEL hurt yourselves more often than the others

>>77263849
I use jewmini. Here’s what I did: I ask it to build a routine, then I open a new chat and paste the routine from the previous one. I keep doing this until the chat stops tweaking the program I'm feeding it

File: 1778521412441185.jpg (74 KB, 632x927)

74 KB JPG

>>77263849
it's proven that all of the LLMs hallucinate 90% of the facts they give you. do what you want with this information

Grok

>>77263865
because it's trained to predict the next token not being truthful, and the original pretraining dataset is filled with internet pseudoscience trash
solved by feeding it enough worthwhile information to fit inside 1 million context window or alternatively building a small RAG with a curated list of sources

>>77264420
>because it's trained to predict the next token not being truthful,
LLMs can't reason

>>77263849
Claude is based and the most helpful. I use it as a social coach and therapist.

>>77263849
Claude and it's not even close.

>>77263865
It's been proven that all of the time that people make unsubstantiated claims on the fitness board with a percentage in them, they're making it up.

>>77265121
That has nothing to do with anything

>>77263849
For advice(not coding)
Gemini>Claude>>>the rest

File: 1778779966316575.jpg (137 KB, 981x1009)

137 KB JPG

Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I think DeepSeek with deep think and search enabled is the best. I never used Claude yet, though

>>77263849
nowadays claude (Opus) is generally better for everything
it's more throughout and actually acknowledges its own limitation or were more information might be needed

the only improvement are "aggregators" like Perplexity that feed more actual sources (websites or papers) into the model
but it's expensive

also no LLM is totally safe from hallucination
the output should always be a suggestion
it's more "motivational", not an actual source of truth...

>for nutrition
what is there to ask?
it's really not that difficult or much to know
>and fitness advice,
what advice can't you get from the sticky or literally any serious fitness website?
>specifically building/critiquing a lifting routine?
for a beginner? Sure, it'll tell you which muscle you missed and other gotchas
for anyone for advanced, it'll hallucinate too much unless you have a very concrete, verifiable question

>>77265571
Any point in paying for Claude's paid version?

>>77265607
only for erotic dom roleplay while in the gym. it motivates you

>>77265607
>Any point in paying for Claude's paid version?
for you in private?
not really

I have the Max subscription
which is nice
but also paid by my company and mostly used for work (programming)

wouldn't buy any subscription myself
just get whatever currently offers a few month free as trial or promotion and use this
the difference are not worth the 20€/month

OP specifically asked for which is best
which is Claude Opus 4.7 (for now)
not if it's worth it...

>>77265546
I've used Claude & Deepseek.

Deepseek expert with deep think is great for nutrition but now that they disabled file upload on expert, I have to sometimes use Claude, but message limit on it is gay.

Claude and GPT mog everyone
Claude is clearly better overall

>>77265723
I also use deepseek for nutrition. The way I work around on the message limit is having one chat per day and carrying any state (rolling macro avgs/weigh in data/tdees/etc) in an initial prompt that I end everyday with asking him to update and start every next day with.
Also, for actually getting macros and plan the day I have a separate chat where I keep a database of products and ask for him to plan. In that one I simply keep editing the previous message to never hit the limit

>which machine should I make lie to me so I don't have to learn anything?
are you indian by chance?

ChatGPT mogs for chemistry and physics
Deepseek mogs for computer troubleshooting/error chasing
Claude mogs for coding
Grok mogs for a chatbot
None of them are good at fitness though

>>77265571
what makes claude better than chatgpt?
been using chatgpt (free) extensively but I've seen claude becoming more and more popular out of nowhere, should I make the move?

>>77263849
>Which LLM is best for nutrition and fitness advice, specifically building/critiquing a lifting routine?
Your brain