[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (292 KB, 499x466)
292 KB PNG
Wait, should i weigh the food before or after cooking it?
it doesn't make sense to weigh it before cooking, unless i would cook a different meal every single time
>>
Another reason why CICO is a meme
There's unironically no way to measure the nutrient and energy loss from cooking and all the energy information out there is for dry food burned inside a bomb calorimeter
Verdict : you should care about macros and micros more and just listen to your body. Assuming you get your protein from animal sources only, give or take 5g of protein from every measure. For carbohydrates and fat the absorption is usually better so at most 3-4g give or take
>>
>>77272374
wow a retard
>>
>>77272387
Turn the monitor back on
>>
>>77272389
hehe good one
>>
imagine making a soup. you'd weight all the ingredients, mark down the nutrients based on that. you'd take a bowl of said soup, measure the volume. now you have the needed data. relative to the entire soup you know the volume of the bowl. So if the bowl is 0.5gal, and the entire soup is 2.5gal, you're eating 1/5th of the soups' nutrients.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.