>puffythoughts?
>>106416081>OSVery slow, but very good>logoOk
The mascot looks depressing
>>106416081just use FreeBSD
>>106416630>just use satanic os the logo is literally the devilno thanks
>>106416630Have you seen how fat and ugly she looks now?
>>106416777> a message from God himselfwe can save her, we the technology
>>106416698you still have ((daemons)) running in background on openbsd, so if you care so much for symbols, you really should stick to templeos
>>106416081cuck license
>>106416081sex with puffy's puffy pussy
>>106416842nta, but there is a huge difference between daemons and literal demonic images.Also, ever since I first saw this word I called it day-mon, even after I found out it's supposed to be pronounced demon. It actually makes no sense to call it demon, just like it makes no sense to pronounce GIF as JIF.
>>106416855I think the license is better because if a corporation wants to use BSDs they can take the code and fuck off and leave the core project alone but if a corporation like microsoft wants to use linux they will poison it from the inside and ruin it for everyone
>>106416081https://openbased.org/
>>106416490>Very slowNah it depends. In some ways it's far faster than Linux. FS is slower for sure, other stuff. But it's safer and more sensible.
>>106416855This is how you know OpenBSD is the best because that's how literally EVERY Open Source project, be it Linux, a BSD fork, or just some random Open Source software or app works but they only bring it up as a criticism for the one and only certified glowie-free OS on the market that consistently filters jews and troons.
>>106416971This 100%
>>106416971Beastie's a generic BSD mascot, he's for all the BSDs. The orb is FreeBSD's
>>106416081>>106418196>FFS and BSD disklabelsEvery other OS has a real filesystem except this piece of shit. Even FreeBSD deprecated disklabels now, and is way ahead with root on ZFS by default. Heck, even ext2 would be a million times better than OpenBSD's slightly upgraded FFS, originally dating back to BSD4.2 (1983!)I appreciate the tech they contributed to other OS'es (OpenSSH, PF, etc), but their lack of a journaled filesytem makes it completely unsuitable for running in production.
>>106418225OpenBaSeD
It's 2025 and OpenBSD still does not have a journaling file system.This disqualifies it for any serious use, including personal/home use.
>>106419216That's what UPSs are for
>>106416081Nifty but I prefer NetBSD>>106418774>Beastie's a generic BSD mascot, he's for all the BSDs.Indeed
>>106416081>puffy
>>106416630>*unzips*>>106416777>oof>*zips back up*
