we already know indians are retarded, why did you think this was worthy of a thread?

>>106425356
Brahmin beast 99% aryan uberman

>>106425356
the condition being true or false doesn't even matter here

>>106425356
>

return 0;

File: 364636436636.png (68 KB, 498x593)

68 KB PNG

>>106425356

#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
    //the following code should be self-explanatory
    int format = 684837;
    uint64_t freqs[16] = {4054998059412627488, 7303807615843717704, 6799974004618176629, 4657449412518044769, 7955156174022466392, 3513286678004007804, 478559098708};
    uint64_t phases[16] = {3316907778697993493, 1442841045428938803, 1156952529336864027, 4473781984858234378, 5490526870435153165, 1527017391200686200, 26681431365};
    uint64_t composite[32] = {0};
    int i = 0;
    unsigned char frequency = i[(char*)(freqs)];
    unsigned char phase = i[(char*)(phases)];
    while (frequency > 0){
        for (int j=phase;j<2048;j+=frequency){
            (j/64)[composite] |= ((uint64_t)1 << j%64);
            }
        frequency = (i%64)[(char*)(freqs+i/64)];
        phase = (i%64)[(char*)(phases+i/64)];
        i++;
    }
    printf((char*)&format, composite);
    return 0;
}

Coroutine in C.

int function(void) {
    static int i, state = 0;
    switch (state) {
        case 0: /* start of function */
        for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            state = 1; /* so we will come back to "case 1" */
            return i;
            case 1:; /* resume control straight after the return */
        }
    }
}

>>106425873
> Now this is looking promising. All we have to do now is construct a few well chosen macros, and we can hide the gory details in something plausible-looking:

#define crBegin static int state=0; switch(state) { case 0:
#define crReturn(i,x) do { state=i; return x; case i:; } while (0)
#define crFinish }
int function(void) {
    static int i;
    crBegin;
    for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
        crReturn(1, i);
    crFinish;
}

https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/coroutines.html

>>106425356
I have ignored hundreds, thousands of brownoids on LinkedIn.

>>106425356
>Is C the best language for intelectual mastrubation
Perl isn't entirely dead yet.

>>106425356
>for intelectual mastrubation
no, thats lisp

ive been asking around why people use lisp
and theres only one answer to that
>i find it neat

>>106425356
I have massive secondhand embarrassment right now

>>106425356
usecase?

File: 1749890423730552.png (44 KB, 462x537)

44 KB PNG

>>106425356
real cniles know printf has a return value
also the return 0 is unnecessary

>>106425356
top kek

>>106425356
Mfw no using puts() instead of printf()

#include <stdio.h>
#define omg(...) printf(__VA_ARGS__);
int main() {
  omg("%" "s", "NO" " " "SEMICOLONS" "!" "\n")
  omg("am a genius\n")
  return 0;
}

i thank god everyday that i never had to deal with jeets. neither when i was writing c, nor when i'm mostly writing rust now. and it aint just about the code.

>>106425356
> not using interrupt 10h

>>106425356
Haskell, Scheme/Lisp, Tcl (yes, really) are all good languages for tricks.

>>106429038
>Proprietary DOS shitware
we syscall or int 0x80 up in this bish.

>>106428632
this uses a semicolon in the predecessor directives

>>106429570
Heh

>>106425356
That text looks suspiciously much like something ChatGPT would write, especially when you consider that jeets can't ever write correct sentences or follow basic grammatical rules.

>>106432218
It's worse than that. There's like a bazillion jeet tutorials on TurboC (yes, pre-ANSI) and none of them appears to acknowledge the existence of indentation.