>53 years >still unsurpassed
>>106425519Rustroon are unsafeing their necks to this.
>>106425617Not a single day passes without Rust living rent free in every cniles head.
>>106425617kek>>106425634Dilate
>>106425634niggy
>>106425634troon out nigga
>>106425634troon fag
>>106425669>>106425671>>106425737>>106425737Ever notice these cniles remain suspiciously quiet in sissy hypno transfer maid threads? Something doesn't add up.
>>106425763>transfer I meant tranime
Cniles only cry about the troons when rust is mentioned (by themselves). In reality they don't care and will happily participate in the next sissy tranime dragon maid thread.I find them very hypocritical.
>>106425634>>106425669>>106425763>>106425841You see, while rust user are trannies, we C men date trannies. I literally dated a russian tranny. She was pretty cute. She was a better woman than actual women.
>>106425669libc is one of the worst parts of C, especially glibcother than that and some other things, it's a great language
>>106425972>shehe*
>>106425617>>106425669>>106425671>>106425700>>106425737Samefag. Rust is for real Z patriotshttps://rb.ru/stories/rust-fastest-growing/https://tproger.ru/translations/rust-ochen-ljubjat-no-chto-v-njom-osobennogo
>$58
>>106425972what skills does a rape master possess?
>>106425841>>106425763How would you even know? Do you expect them to scream about loving C while calling maidposters "tranny"? How are the two even related?>see maid>I am C programmer with 40 years of experience and I declare that you are a trannyposting tranny!Why would anyone behave that way?
>>106426592maidposters are mentally ill trany pedoes.janies used to nuke em off the board, idk why theyve been allowed to come back recently
>>106426163>only $58 to learn the most powerful language in the worldWhat a bargain. I prefer the first edition even though it's a little rough around the edges, not as safe.
>>106426608What does that have to do with expecting people to declare their love of C as they call maidposters "trannies"? Do you usually declare your favorite programming language before calling people "tranny"?
>>106425519>surpassed by C++
>>106426630>k&r c>teaches you to programwhat a retarded memebut at least it makes you nocodeshitters oust yourselves
>>106426639>OOP on top of CNot better.
>>106426639if by surpassed you mean ugly as shit with documentation that is completely incomprehensible, then yes.
>>106426633what does it have to do with anything, retard?show me c-ultists declaring that they code in c since 40 years before calling a maidposter- trany
>>106426592Why don't cniles protest when someone posts sissy hypno tranime dragon maids in their little cnile help threads?
>>106426608>idk why theyve been allowed to come back recentlyThe CIA let them come back in hopes that Eli posts his research, because his counting research actually has some really interesting implications for AI if it is correct.
>>106426670eli is a profound retardall he ever produced is mental illness>implications for aii meanmental illness begets mental illness so theres that
>>106426659I'm pointing out that nobody does this because it doesn't make sense. Also, Rust is associated with transwomen because they built about half of the Rust compiler and write most of the Rust software and also have high level positions on the board. Maybe reconsider your irrational hatred for transwomen, considering they made something you seem to love?
>>106426688i dont hate tranoidsi despise themits not the same>love rustno, its another thing i despise. wtf are you on? nobody loves rust not even rust evangelists
>>106425519Nobody will notice this post, butYou're thinking small. 53 years? That's it? Lmao. 53 years is nothing. You live in the beginning of IT age. It's not even started to show what technology is capable of. I mean we already have "AI" in it's imbecile form. In 100 years, it's possible that C will be left forgotten, like Algol or Forth. It's also sad to realise that we live too early for mecha cat girls and the matrix and all that. 53 years is nothing. You are nothing, we are nothing. Just a blink of time.
C is hard to read and should be avoided if you want to stay sane. Like can you find the bug in this 10 line snippet of code?
>>106426791>i hit myself on my finger and its the hammers faultwith such a workforce one can only look for solutions to keep you retarded niggers in lineproposing that i use one of such solutions is beyond insultingbut for some reason you crabs seem proud to use a jeetlangidc why to be honestthe answer is mental retardation, as always
>>106426791>ChatGPT, find the bug in this codeDone. THe difference is that I know how to use my tools.
>>106426819what an original way to tell somebody you never worked on anything past a fizzbuzz, without actually saying it
>>106426791is it over here?
>>106427201what's wrong with that? casting a 16 bit int as a 32 bit doesn't change the value.
>>106426791skill issue
>>106425519>free after use
>>106427411>free after use
>>106425519Made by the boomers you so vehemently despise.
>>106427429>Implying k&r still actively develop the language>implying c users are gonna purity spiral like your fellow redditorsyou shills are retardedyour mere existence is the best argument against the use of rust- its a cognitohazardusing rust will damage your brain and make you post on bluesky
>>106427201The first case is wrong, it should be u16.https://cybersect.substack.com/p/linus-and-the-two-youts
>>106427461>The thing to note about this is that their definition of make_u32_from_two_u16() is wrong. It casts the low part to a (u32) instead of a (u16). If the original variable has high-order bits (such as by being signed and negative), it’ll incorrectly put those bits in the upper part. In other words, make_u32_from_two_u16(0,-1) will be 0xFFFFFFFF.got it. didn't think about what would happen if you dropped a >16bit bit integer into the macro.
>>106427420>use after free
>>106427491yes, i know you retarded niggerlamao
>>106426791>#defineImagine a language so terrible at reliably reusing code efficiently that it is a better decision to just tell the compiler>yeah, bro, just copy, paste, find and replace this text, don't worry about any of that "optimization" stuff. "Inline"? Nah, brah, you do you.
>>106427649>how to tell the assembly youre mentally deficient AND an asshole at the same time, without actually saying it
>>106425669c++ uses libstdc++, it only uses libc if you use libc functions.
>>106427664what a retard
>>106427766yeah, a typical crabhe knows shit from fuck but still feels the need to throw in his worthless opinion like a textbook d&k
>>106427664>>106427766>>106427809>Types? Who needs 'em. All data is just bytes at the end of the day. If I use the wrong type by mistake that's okay, that code probably won't even run after the UB 200 lines below causes it to be deleted silently.>Inline? No, that's the compiler's choice, if I want to ensure that a function is inlined, I'll just use find-and-replace. Otherwise I might get an undefined symbol error if I do it wrong!Rust is irredeemable garbage, but don't think for a second that anyone but the most deranged even considers it for a second for any reason except that C is irredeemable garbage in its own ways.
>>106427914>Typesc has em.>force inlinesextended c has em.maybe you should shut the fuck up, d&k
>>106427949the fuck is d&k
>>106427955dunning krugerfkn hell, redditdo better
>>106427949>c has em.Not in a #define it doesn't.>extended c has em.Not C. Try harder.
>>106428072>defines get expanded in code, and thats under this form that you will get a type erroryou dont know what a define is>__attribute__((always_inline))and you dont know what extended c iswhy the fuck do you keep talking?
>>106425519I'd agree, but only since ANSI.
>>106428087>you dont know what a define isI know enough to know that it does not check its argument or return types, unless you'd like to provide a counterexample.>and you dont know what extended c isI know enough to know that you have to qualify it as "extended" as in "Real C can't do this">why the fuck do you keep talking?Because you keep giving me asspained (You)'s.
>>106428118>I know enoughyou clearly dontdefines are not functions.and extended c is real c. thats production c.and youre very fucking retardedno wonder you got filtered
>>106428162>defines are not functions.Except that one is. It takes arguments, and returns a value. Its a poor-man's inline function.>and extended c is real c. thats production c.So explain why the "production c" above isn't using it and chose to use a #define instead.>no wonder you got filteredThere's C and C++ code I wrote that's in active combat zones. I left that role because those languages are miserable to write and I don't define my personality based on making things more difficult for myself than they need to be. You shitpost on a Mongolian basket-weaving forum about being able to write fizzbuzz without a GC because it makes your balls feel big. You are not in a position to be talking about "filtered".
>>106428220>There's C and C++ code I wrote that's in active combat zones.so you're a zogbot? you deserve bad things to happen to you.
>>106428100I don't think there's too much egregious about C17. C23 is pandering too hard to C++ garbage, which I don't appreciate.
>>106428220lamao what a complete retard imbecilethe text gets inlined into the code you complete ignoranttheres no function, theres no return, just a text substitution with extra stepsyou can see that if you compile with the -E flag, it outputs the code with all macros expanded instead of a binarythe absolute fucking state of crab rabble oh my godand as a typical mongoloid you dont know when to stop
>>106428240C89 is the sweet spot for me. Don't care for the new stuff. C99 has a few nice extras for sure, but since the standard no longer requires VLA's to be supported (some compilers completely skipped them over), it is still safer to do plain C89 and preserve backwards compatibility.
>>106428254>the text gets inlined into the code you complete ignorant>theres no function, theres no return, just a text substitution with extra stepsNo kidding. That's exactly what I'm saying. And yet, its being used as though it were a function. It takes arguments, and the result of the substitution is an expression, which if used as the RHS of an assignment produces the same effect as returning from a function, the same as if it were a function that were inlined. Except C can't force inlining without deviating from the standard (which makes it no longer C), and you don't get any of the benefits of it being a function, such as type checking the body or debug symbols.
>>106428351>its being used as though it were a function.i dont do that. if i want a force inlined function i use a force inline>b-but thats not in the standaaard!!!!!idc. c didnt have a standard for the first 10 years of its existence or soassuming embedded is the biggest user of c, they all use compiler flags and extensionsare you gonna tell me thats not c either?>and thats why you should be using rust!!!lick my taint. im an anarchist at heart and thats one of the reasons why c suits me so well. i dont take kindly to artificial limitations
>>106428425>i dont do that.Of course. I'm sure you also never write bugs too. Lots of Cniles tell me that.>are you gonna tell me thats not c either?If it were C it would be in the standard, and it would be required in all compilers. Don't you Cniles always go on about how C is the only language that will run on some obscure chip that stopped production 30 years ago and was only ever sold in some third-word country, and that's why its the best language ever? Surely you would never write non-portable C, that would make all of those claims in bad faith, no?>>and thats why you should be using rust!!!God no. The day serious companies give rusttroons the boot will be a day to celebrate. But every day you dig your heels in a pretend C doesn't have insurmountable flaws and don't demand a better language is another day where a reasonable person might be tricked into using rust.
>>106428283_Atomic and thread local are part of C11. You can work around the lack of both of these but they're neat additions.
>>106428471>But every day you dig your heels in a pretend C doesn't have insurmountable flawsnice strawmen and sad homonemsbut if we put them aside theres nothing left
>>106428612>nice strawmen and sad homonemsYou don't actually know what either of those mean, do you?
>>106428652>another *very sad homonemin case you dont knowif you want your insults to have any sort of impactyour interlocutor has to have at least a modicum of respect towards youand i have none
>>106428664Lotta big words from someone who can't spell "hominem" given two separate changes to fix it. Put the thesaurus down and try a dictionary. Or maybe "see spot run", it might be a little more your speed.
>>106428720> who can't spell "hominem"i know how to spell itand youre completely devoid of humor which is in line with being mentally deficientare you american perchance?
>>106428730>and youre completely devoid of humorI'm not the one claiming "accidentally" (wink) spelling "hominem" as "homonem" constitutes a joke. I don't think you're in a position to be the grand arbiter of comedy here.
>>106428770yeah completely accidental like spelling "ad" as "sad". twice.you really thought you had a gotcha there, didnt you?
>>106428804Wait, are you seriously trying to say your "joke" is that you used the word "homo"? That's the level you're operating on? I would've gone with the spelling mistake, less of an embarrassment for yourself. My earlier jab implying you were some young pup getting a fat head over learning a bit of C and thinking you were a "l33t hax0r" for using malloc was just that, a jab, but now I'm wondering if I actually had it right the whole time. Are you gonna tell me I have "cooties" next?
>>106428874>more sad homonemsyoure very unoriginal>is that the level you operate onim a child at heart.on the other hand, pretending to be mature is childishand killing your inner child over that is retarded on top of that
>>106425972Based cnile
>>106428943>t. ranny, currently thirstingwhy dont you shove your cock up your ass?wouldnt that solve alot of problems?
>>106426094>Ziggers being retardednothing surprising here
>>106426647You can just not use the OOP crap, there are lots of other useful features.
>>106425519>>53 yearsbest thing is that 99% of the language is the same.perfect from the start.
Too bad you need to know C++ to get a job anywhere
>>106428950I approve this messaget. cnile tranny
>>106425972we dont claim this faggot
cniles in shambles
>>106425984I can smell the troon socks from this post
>>106425634SPBP
>>106425519Literally because it's the Occam's razor of programming languages.
Problem is, when ever somebody markets something as improvement over C, they go the c++ route instead of making improvements to C.And the standard committee is trying to rape the language.
C sucks, but my x86-64 assembly program written for linux is not portable, so it's the best choice I have among all things that suck
