>"If AI can do this in 5 minutes, why would we hire you?"How do you respond without sounding mad?
>>106427989"But can AI suck your cock under the table right now?"
>>106427989>if ai could do this then what are we even doing here?also>op is a cum drinking retard aicultist
>>106427989i dunno, can AI set 25 gallons worth of gasoline on fire in your building and seal your doors shut?
>>106427989because I'm the one prompting
>>106427989I would remind the interviewer her numbers sound made up and should be double-checked because she is a woman.
>>106427989Why would I be trying to get a job? Why would I want to be a wagie? AI should do everything.
you all sound mad btw
I'm very good as finding the right prompts to get the AI to do this in 5 minutes.
I doubt any interviewer is dumb enough to ask this question, but you hire me to tell the AI to do it in 5 minutes, I'm liable for the work it puts out.
>>106427989Because you will need someone to fix everything the AI does wrong.
>>106427989"You wouldn't, and yet you're hiring."
>>106427989>If
/thread [repeat from earlier this week]
>>106427989But... I am AI
>>106427989Why haven't Ai companies fired all their programmers?
>>106427989'If your internet is down, then good look witnessing your AI stopping the whole production"
>>106428019lmao would love to see this live
>>106427989"Because you somehow still can't do it yourself."
>>106427989which one of you will know when the AI gets in wrong in some subtle way that ends up costing your business a lot of money?
>>106427989>>"If AI can do this in 5 minutes, why would we hire you?"Will that AI be able to solve the bugs the code it generated has in 5 minutes like me?
>>106427989Then wtf are we doing here, you fucking jeetlovers?
>>106427989Okay.>AI can’t do this in 5 minutes>AI can’t innovate a novel way to do this>AI can’t progress from a novice engineer to a senior one>I’m cheaper because I won’t inevitably fuck up badly enough to delete your entire codebase or release major, unfixable vulnerabilities.
>>106427989Then why are you even interviewing anyone?
>>106428011>25 gallons worth of I got mad reading this.
"Every company so far that relied too much on AI went bankrupt or faced significant losses due to their core systems breaking down. But go ahead if that is what you want."
>>106428117We are not there yet faggot, and won’t be there for the next at minimum 15 years, that is if you actually believe timelines similar to ones proposed in AI 2027 paper. In the meantime you need to work to feed yourself and survive.>>106428010SPBP
>>106427989>"Well if you're hiring in the first place, that's admitting that AI can't do what you need in 5 minutes. AI is a powerful tool when used by programmers, but at the end of the day it is a tool; you can't replace a labourer with the hammer he wields. If somebody doesn't know what the actual silicon is doing, they'll struggle to give effective instructions to the AI, let alone spot the mistakes the AI will inevitably make."
>>106427989"It can't", I say proudly, in the Junior IT Technologist interviewIT dustmen stay winning; AI can't physically repair stuff
>>106427989With a slap in the face.
