[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why do graphics libraries keep getting more complicated? Compare legacy OpenGL to modern OpenGL. Now compare modern OpenGL to Vulkan.

Does anyone actually code with Vulkan?

Ask ChatGPT "write a simple C program using the Vulkan API that outputs a triangle to the screen." It can't do it. That's how complicated Vulkan is.

Does anyone actually use this shit?
>>
Regular developers are not the target users of Vulkan, it's made for engine developers. It is necessarily complex because exposes very specialized things that can't be made simpler without sacrificing generalizability.
>>
Because graphics are getting more complicated. It's not that hard.
>>
>>106428307
onions faggot. of the variety that sucks nigger dicks



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.