[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: artixFlatIcon.png (23 KB, 1200x630)
23 KB
23 KB PNG
Thinking of installing Artix, but I'm concerned about the security of their packages.
How much can you actually trust their maintainers? What's stopping them from slipping malware into the repos?
Artix has such a small userbase that "many eyes make bugs shallow" doesn’t really apply here.
>>
>>106431096
>What's stopping them from slipping malware into the repos?
Absolutely nothing. Only use it if systemd gets in the way of your work.
>>
File: 1726131943351603.jpg (91 KB, 1241x1280)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
>>106431096
>Oy vey, can we really trust the Artix repo managers over the trusted transvestites that manage mainstream distros?
>>
>>106431096
Not much.
>>
I would be using it but they haven't figured out the concept of dual booting with Windows 11, leaving secure boot and bitlocker enabled

They refer to the Arch manuals which are a confusing nightmare to deal with

Unlike Ubuntu/Debian whom actually have it figured out, and know exactly what the user wants at install time



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.