Why cant Radeon beat Nvidia even in non-gaming applications?
>>106442412Probably because they focus on gaming.
>>106442433But they dont beat Nvidia at gaming either
>>106442448Yeah, I guess thats why consoles use Nvidia instead of AMD chips.
>>106442479consoles the AMD chips in Xbox and Playstation can never outperform an RTX 3050 lmao
>>106442491Because that's not their target. They target specific devices for cost to function, such as, consoles. Also consoles being behing PC is common. I'm not sure what your point is.
>>106442479Consoles use AMD because they're cheaper, that's the only thing AMD has going for them, is being cheaper than Nvidia
>>106442514I litterally said they aim for cost to function in my last post... I can see that I am talking to a person that can't read. Thanks for the laugh, mate.
>>106442523But the OP question is why they literally cant compete in performance cost-wise or not.
>>106442523>in my last postYou expect people to be able to tell while posting anonymously? Are you retarded?
>>106442543Why do people buy Android devices over Apple? Why do Africans Americans buy Playstation instead of PC? Its just an option. If there was 1 one option you'd just have to buy the shit they sell you at what ever price they set. Performance comes at a cost, yes, but having an option is good for the consumer, not the communist.
>>106442572That has nothing to do with the question.
>>106442559>person gets a reply>person that replies to reply made for 1 reply gets confusedYour mom could have aborted you to save us from shit like this.
>>106442588Can you put on a tripcode so I can put you in my filter?
Works on my Arch machine.
>>106442587It does, why do you think the competition needs to be the exact same thing? Let people have options. $799 for 12GB card with RTX and X CUDA Cores and X Tensor cores....or$399 for 16GB RX with Open Source Drivers light Ai Cores and good compatibility with UNIX, Linux, and Taco Bell Kiosks?I have an option. I choose the one I like.
>>106442625Still dodging the question.
>>106442645>why they literally cant compete in performance cost-wise or not>Because they don't have to, they have different targets for their price pointYou're a fucking retard.
>>106442663>Because they don't have to.They actually have to.
>>106442675>>106442625Dude answered your question. You just don't understand the answer. But he should have put 8gb for the Nvida example for the lols.
>>106442448They beat Nvidia in the midrange, and also in the low end (APUs) which Nvidia completely abandoned
>>106442412Nvidia has a hundred times as much money as they do to throw into GPU development. The only way AMD would catch up is if Nvidia fucked up immensely. And even then it would only be for gaming.
I bought a 9070xt. Ryujinx and dolphin crash constantly now and my 3060 performed better in ryujinx upscaling. Yes I have tried both opengl and vulcan. I cant play botw or re4 on my second monitor while working now.
>>106442412I always thought about this. Yeah, sure, your GPUs are 10% slower than nVidia™; but why can't you make FSR as good as DLSS? Just because your GPUs are slightly slower means you can't release game-day drivers?The Radeon division is a joke.
>>106444224I never used Ryujinx but Dolphin has never crashed on me or had any performance issues when using AMD GPUs.And why the fuck would you play AAA video games while working. Not saying I never played video games while working but usually only things like Solitaire or idle stuff
>>106444305Botw is casual and easy and so is re4.
>>106444224I have a shitty old Radeon and it plays Ryujinx just fine. Never had a crash with it. Can't speak for Dolphin though.I feel like older GPUs overall just have less issues than current gen ones.
