>1366x768
>>106442564Got me through school. Kids are spoilt these days.
>>106442564I was using this until 2022 when I went from my old netbook to a new laptop. I still have that old 13” netbook and I have to say it’s really not that bad, even when comparing it to a 15” 1920x1200 screen.
>1049088I don't get it
>>106442564perfectly usable in 2025
>>106442564>4098x2304finally some fucking pixels
>>106442564>500x271
>640x480
>>106442643i went from 15.6" 1366x768 to 14" 1920x1200 and the difference is BRUTAL
>1920*1080
>>106442564I have two LG screens, one that does 1600x900, and another that does 1366x768.They look almost identical except for a white LG logo/led light button being white on the smaller screen.I didn't planned for any of this, but i have a mini-me.And you are in the mini-me.
>>106445646>15.6" 1366x768that's a comfy resolution at that size actuallythe real issue is that a quality panel of that kind simply does not exist on the marketeach of them are cheap low quality TN panels with awful viewing anglesit hurts so much
>>106445814It's the "correct DPI (tm)".The "mini-me" i use don't have drastic viewing angle problems, but it's blue as fuck.
>>106445814That was fun back in like 2005.Now, nobody uses that shit.
>>106442564Why does this resolution still exist among modern laptops? Just why? 1080p is so common now, all lower resolutions should be phased out already except 1680 x 1050.
>>106445814Weren't all the 15.6" screens with 1366 x 768 resolution all low quality TN panels as well? The quality panels with better viewing angles, brightness, and contrast have been 1080p or greater, in my experience. That said, all the 768p and some of the 1080p screens I've seen have been junk.
