/g/ - why isn't there an ffmpeg for images - Technology

Anonymous

08/31/25(Sun)21:42:37 No.106448950

File: 1499384308119.png (294 KB, 665x608)

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)21:42:37 No.106448950 Archived

why isn't there an ffmpeg for images

Anonymous
08/31/25(Sun)21:43:39 No.106448956

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)21:43:39 No.106448956

90% of the time ffmpeg is a sufficient ffmpeg for images, otherwise you use imagemagick.

Anonymous
08/31/25(Sun)21:46:34 No.106448976

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)21:46:34 No.106448976

a thread died for this

Anonymous
08/31/25(Sun)21:50:56 No.106449003

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)21:50:56 No.106449003

>>106448950
There is. It's imagemagick

Anonymous
08/31/25(Sun)22:04:12 No.106449105

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)22:04:12 No.106449105

>>106448950
imagemagick, although I’m pretty sure FFMPEG will also do images to some extent

Anonymous
08/31/25(Sun)22:06:01 No.106449116

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)22:06:01 No.106449116

>>106449003
Can it handle 1-bit pcx's?

Anonymous
08/31/25(Sun)22:06:12 No.106449118

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)22:06:12 No.106449118

>>106448976
good, one less tranime thread in the catalog

Anonymous
08/31/25(Sun)22:10:10 No.106449146

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)22:10:10 No.106449146

>>106448950
https://imagemagick.org/script/convert.php

Anonymous
08/31/25(Sun)22:16:22 No.106449196

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)22:16:22 No.106449196

File: 1470806352541.jpg (74 KB, 720x480)

anon...
next you'll ask "why isn't there an ffmpeg for audio"

Anonymous
08/31/25(Sun)22:24:20 No.106449255

Anonymous 08/31/25(Sun)22:24:20 No.106449255

ffmpeg is woke