[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: endgame.webm (3.68 MB, 1280x720)
3.68 MB
3.68 MB WEBM
from day one, the boomer was denying that there was an interesting sound in a multi platinum/diamond song, not having the slightest open mind or curiosity, just outright denying it, just being this extremely dense and unlikeable, completely talentless as a music producer

>/g/ makes a 16th album
Here we are making the sequel to the first /g/ album.
Theme: Loosely technology themed
Title: Shitposting Fundamentals (2nd edition)
Deadline: 30th of August, 11:00 UTC
Listening party: 31st of August, 21:00 UTC
First album link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Qe6rnW850 [Embed]

>/g/ makes a 17th album
Theme: [Accepting suggestions]

>Song submission rules/guidelines
Upload the file somewhere, preferably in a lossless format, and post the link here. If you want to update your track, make a new post.
Include the song title in the post, and make it clear that your song is a submission for the album.
Optionally you may include cover art for your track, but please confirm that the image in your post is the cover art or it won't be included.
You may not use your real artist name.
Songs that contain anything against YouTube's policies won't be uploaded on YT, but will still be added to the album.
By default, tracks will be normalised to -14 LUFS (integrated loudness) in the release. You may specify a lower loudness for your track.
Generative AI is banned. This includes AI generated stems, samples, and effects. "AI" includes all neural network-based models and not hard-coded automation/procedural generation.

>Where can I hear the previous albums?
https://rentry.org/dmpalbums (outdated)
https://www.youtube.com/@MusicOf4chan

>Wikis
https://dmpdoc.neocities.org/
https://mu-sic-production.fandom.com/wiki//mu/sic_Production_Wiki

Previous: >>106344746
>>
File: endgame.webm (2.86 MB, 1280x720)
2.86 MB
2.86 MB WEBM
>>
when the party
>>
Remember that to chuzo you're all wrong. Because the voices said so. It's debatable wether those voices are schizophrenic or text in a prompt but either way you're wrong, don't engage.
>>
>>106450085
several anons have admitted that they're can't/won't get to professional quality and they're just having fun. but you seem adamant that you know how music works, you use professional artists as examples of "terrible" production as if you can do the same or better.
>>
>blaming other people for your own wrongdoings
Not the brightest bulb, eh?
>>
damnit anons, all you had to do was not reply to chuzo. that caught me off guard
>>106344746
>>
wrong link
>>106451127
>>
>>106450031
see >>106451127
>>
hey /dmp/
>>
>>106453191
>>106453262
>>106453615
Wrong thread fellas.
This is the non-troll one: >>106451127
>>
>>106453649
>hot girl in endgame chair vs meat sticks
uuh bruh I'll stick to this one thanks
>>
>>106453674
based
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_the_affections
>"Affections are not the same as emotions; however, they are a spiritual movement of the mind".[11]
this says it is NOT about emotions. SOME people might get very emotional from listening to music and might listen to specific songs to reinforce or cope with whatever emotions they might feel in the moment. but it's too subjective and vague to handwave music in its entirety as being about emotional expression. it's like you don't actually know what you're doing when writing a song so you make up some vague explanation like "it fell out of the sky" "it came to me in a dream" "muh emotions". a song might just sound good and be more or less intellectually stimulating but it doesn't have to be any more emotional than enjoying a tasty burger.
>>
and youtubers and such who larp as educators don't even write good songs themselves they just talk about this emotional storytelling whereas the real successful artists usually don't talk about conveying specific emotions
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/x7Bnyi65m8E
>>
>>106456154
>>106456237
Meds unironically
>>
>>106456384
if your goal is to make the most emotionally intense song (which can easily come across as cheesy cringe and tryhard) you're still not going to get there with weak production no matter how well written your song is, the top tier songs are generally from decades past because they had technological tricks using analog gear, the more recent examples like "despacito" and "shape of you" also used a ton of analog gear
>>
>>106456709
Good songs have both, fuckass
>>
>>106456730
you and several anons have consistently put songwriting above all else, even claiming that the production can suck and the songriting is what really matters, what i'm saying is that the songwriting isn't rocket science if you have any amount of talent, especially in the mainstream genres like pop, hiphop and EDM people have moaned about the formulaic lowest common denominator style of songwriting, the thing that most people don't have access to is professional grade production, most people would need to get noticed by a label so the label can pay for production and mixing and mastering
>>
>>106456757
Not reading. Suck my dick dumbo
>>
>>106456853
i accept your concession
>>
>>106456864
Cool, now leave
>>
File: dmp schizo.png (8 KB, 800x561)
8 KB
8 KB PNG
>>106456916
He does leave, eventually. It all depends on you!
>>
File: DMP cytube link.png (3 KB, 181x31)
3 KB
3 KB PNG
sage and go here: >>106451127
Listening party in 30 min
>>
>>106457319
i left /prod/ months ago because the boomer had a meltdown about "gearfags". you people truly suck while accuusing me of all sorts of things but no matter what you say and no matter how many people (samefags) take the boomer's side it's not going to solve what really matters in terms of making music that doesn't suck ass. some anons say they're just doing it for fun but the boomer has ideas about music success.
>>
>>106457586
I'm the boomer and before you left /prod/ I literally had an argument against someone saying that there's no advantage to hardware gear, and I argued for hardware.
Once again, everything you say is made up schizo babble and I agree that production is very important (most of my focus is on production techniques in fact), but that composition/songwriting is also vitally important.
It's both, and you know it, which is why you can't argue it without strawmanning everything I say and pretending that I believe the (retarded) opposite of your dumb beliefs.
>>
>>106457712
nice gaslighting lmfao, the closest thing would be
https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/126521248/#126527119
>I own a flagship modern synth and a prophet rev 2, and I think you're a coping cargo cultist
if you're this anon, you thought there was no benefit to the sound quality vs software instruments, it was just practical reasons like for offloading cpuu usage
>>
and in the previous thread to this /dmp/ you completely lost your mind insisting that songwriting is more important production
>>
https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/126521248/#126534470
>I don't think anyone who takes gearfagging seriously in a world where skrillex and soulja boy both definitively disproved the hypothesis has an opinion worth anything really. You're the ultimate consoomer bugman. Other bugmen spend moderately on slop entertainment because they enjoy it. Gearfag bugmen spend lavishly on obsolete technology because marketing boardrooms have duped you into constructing a (disproven) ideology that claims outdated tech is absolutely critical to making a good song. As if Bohemian Rhapsody deep fried with 20 layers of horrific MP3 compression isn't vastly more listenable than anything you've ever written. If you want to prove me wrong, I'll deep fry Bohemian Rhapsody, and you show us your proudest accomplishment, and we'll let the thread decide which they prefer to listen to.
lolcow tier
>>
>>106457802
I'm not.
>>
>>106457820
That's not me either lmao
>>
>>106457825
even if true, you've been utterly unhelpful since day one, mostly just antagonizing me or insisting that your shitty opinions are the objective truth, you've had disagreements with a number of other anons as well
>>
it's also funny because queen had top tier synths like roland jupiter 8 and various studio equipment etc
>>
>>106457830
>antagonizing me
As you just found out, many people have been arguing with you. I'm just the main one because I'm argumentative and don't get tired to continue responding, but I'm for sure not the only one.

>insisting that your shitty opinions are the objective truth
You say this mere minutes after saying I lost my mind for disagreeing with you lmao.
Again, every single thing you accuse us of doing applies way more to you than to us.

>you've had disagreements with a number of other anons as well
And? I know it's multiple people.
I'm not the one who thinks everyone who argues with him is the same guy.
How do you constantly fail to understand why anything you do is schizo-tier?
I don't remember ever reading a single valid argument in any of your posts.
You post EXACTLY the way an AI trained to be as retarded as possible and to only talk in logical fallacies would write.
>>
why don't you two get it over with and have gay sex already, we can feel the heat from here
>>
>>106457892
here's a thread outside of /dmp/ and /prod/ where it's clearly (You) harassing me and having the unreasonable opinion for someone who's larping as a music producer
https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/124921408/
>>
>>106457928
That's not harassment. Calling you a dumb piece of shit is an objective observation.
>>
>>106457973
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxamb-R9U5M
i didn't watch the whole video but to get the point across, at 1:20 when he puts in the strings, it's not fucking mozart tier 4d chess, you're the dumb retard if you think otherwise, especially in that time period it was all about the sounds so relatively talentlesss EDM kids and hiphop beatmakers could become successful because they knew how to use a DAW
>>
>>106457990
>An idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity
-Terry A. Davis
>>
>>106458084
the irony is lost on you, you're the idiot who overcomplicates songwriting while underestimating production and subtle nuances done to the sound during mixing and mastering, nuances which are entirely separate from songwriting. while i'm the genius who sees simple songwriting for what it is, i don't want to do some tryhard virtuoso nonsense.
>>
>>106458114
I'm sorry you don't have what it takes to appreciate how difficult it is to write a catchy hit like that, even if it may look simple to those who have never made music.
If it's as easy as you say, why don't you write something similar to shut us up?
Oh wait, you've never even used a piano roll...
Pathetic.

>overcomplicates songwriting
Hallucinations.

>while underestimating production and subtle nuances done to the sound during mixing and mastering, nuances which are entirely separate from songwriting
More hallucinations.
I never said they're not important.
Only that both are, and between the two it's songwriting that has the bigger impact on the audience's enjoyment of a song, which is absolutely the consensus among musicians and producers alike, and not a controversial statement at all.

>i don't want to do some tryhard virtuoso nonsense.
Too bad you couldn't even if you wanted to, just like you can't do the simple stuff either, AND you can't produce or mix.
You can't do anything lmao, which explains all your opinions.
>>
>>106458167
you truly are a fucking idiot, you don't even know how idiotic you are, good luck with making music that doesn't suck ass, like holy shit you can't even see how you've been consistently the dumbest motherfucker i've ever seen in my life, you're literally like a genius but in the opposite direction, truly incredible like those lemon juice robbers who inspired the dunning-kruger research, you hardly even merit this (You) but here you go

(You)
>>
>>106458184
>has no argument and lashes out
Ah, already at the melty stage?
Didn't take much this time lol
>>
>>106458215
you're a troglodyte but keep telling yourself whatever helps you sleep at night
>>
>>106458184
y u mad bro
>>
>>106458235
Lolcow
>>
>>106458291
you'll be laughing all the way to the bank when you release your music to accolades and possibly grammy nominations, keep it up champ
>>
>>106458305
This but unironically, while you'll still be sitting at the computer, angrily screenshotting reddit posts that you misunderstand as saying that you can become successful without doing any work lmao
Keep seething bitch
>>
>>106458282
he's been harassing me for years, just incredibly asshurt at my ability to learn advanced subjects and successfully implement solutions at a rapid pace, while he's literally getting quite old and unable to learn much of anything and he possibly has hearing loss so he can't appreciate why a piece of gear costs $10k and people are willing to pay that for the sound quality and not just the tactile user experience and it's not placebo in the slightest, i can clearly see that the songwriting of even top artists like the beatles, ABBA, queen, michael jackson, madonna etc is fucking overrated, they all benefited from technological trickery like top of the line synths and studio equipment, anons could take years and years writing the best damn songs ever and they're going to fall flat without the equipment and engineering to go with it

>>106458354
yeah good luck with that fucking moron
>>
>>106458364
you sound upset. audio is just an auditory hallucination bro, chill and take your meds
>>
>>106458364
All lies btw. Literally not a single thing in this post is true lmao



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.