>I'm gonna vibecod-ACKKKK
>>106450177The fuck even is that winjeet shit
>>106450177error: too many errors
>>106450205This is literally used in jeet CS classrooms today. Can't say I disapprove.
>>106450177Codejeet alert
>>106450250The fuck... That looks like an old DOS IDE.
>>106450297It is, TurboC.
>>106450309Yeah that's about what it looked like. I just didn't immediately recognize it because I haven't used that since I moved on from the original IBM PC with a monochrome monitor.
>>106450319Did the name TURBOC3 give it away?
reminds of the nineties where the turbonerds did a frequency sweep through the pc speaker in the computer lab
>>106450250Why don't they install Linux and use GCC?
>>106450727No usecase. They're already using relatively modern versions of windows and run this stuff from emulators.
>>106450762>and run this stuff from emulators.This "stuff" might teach them bad practices that will lead to code that won't compile on modern msvc/gcc
>>106450801No idea how they work that out. Just sharing what a jeet told me.
>>106450727The instructors are probably unwilling to learn anything. They might not even know much about programming, just reading off a script
>>106450177The type of pc they went on moon with fr
>>106450887https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrjkTql3jnm9Uk9a5biL5bdtjSWJGX9f8Kek, no indentation.
>>106450177Maybe those Indian professors still teach using Turbo C++ to force their students to work with legacy code.But if I recall correctly, Turbo C++ can still have its compiler invoked from the command line, so you could use a modern IDE instead that you can vibe code with then just invoke the Turbo C++ compiler from a script.
>>106450801Fuck modern C++. It results in complex, unmaintainable trash and makes for weak minded devs.
>>106451872STL and whatnot only exist to be more expressive. But if you truely believe an LLM would be better for programmers to express themselves with anyway, then modern C++ is pointless bloat.
