would you use a web browser made and owned by israelis?
>>106461385chrome?no i just use the one that they infiltrated and subverted by paying for their meals to avoid monopoly accusations (didnt work)
>>106461385Trick question.
>>106461385Is it good?I don't give a fuck about politics, just give me a good software. It can be made by Tranny crossbreed of Jews and Chinks born from the depths of hell and I'll be fine if it will work better than Chrome and Firefucks.
>>106461404>>106461408>>106461447what about a web browser made and owned by chinese?
I guess. Though, you'd be catering to my idea of a good browser that hasn't existed in like 8 years.
>>106461469why would they make a good browser? their track record is shithttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Download_Valley
>>106461469give us a rundown of your ideal web browser
>>106461385Most depressing thing about this retarded, neverending bitchery is that securing and unpozzing a browser is a rather trivial task. Just zapping out the offending url's and external ip's in the code will very much render it safe.
>>106461479>why would they make a good browser?'cause the idea OP posed is that they want me to use it.
>>106461491basically nothing else matters but how good the browser is at rendering javascript.thats why chromes "fast" most of the websites that people are using on the internet are engineered by them, for chrome. they can use whatever javascript fuckery and have it work as optimized as possible with their browser.its amazing that firefox/apple can even compete to the level of being useable in this context. and they are, its not like chrome is magnitudes faster and better than firefox. it becomes trivial when you have decent hardware.
>>106461565well that was underwhelming
>>106461585well firefox is already perfect for me, any feature you want i can create it myself as an extension. there are issues with the firefox extension market in that you have to basically "sign them" for security before you can distribute them which is inconvenient because you have to do it each time "install it" you restart the browser, until you sign it by uploading it to their repo.firefox forks allow you to circumvent that. but anyway im saying, the firefox extension engine and api for making your own shit is already so good that i can make anything i want.i make userscripts usually instead for the websites i want personal custom features on.
>>106461619which os you running?
>>106461648OS: Linux Mint 22.1 x86_64WM: dwm
>>106461674oh good, i was worried you were running the latest microsoft...
>>106461674also best firefox fork id recommend is waterfox
>>106461491basically the freedom that firefox offered around 2015. xul+web extensions. I guess you could bundle in the modern web standards.
>>106461385ABSOLUTLY NOT!FREE PELPASTINE
