/g/ - >The RAID 5 and RAID 6 modes of Btrfs are fatally - Technology

Anonymous

09/02/25(Tue)10:57:42 No.106463396

File: smug.gif (2.51 MB, 498x280)

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)10:57:42 No.106463396 Archived

>The RAID 5 and RAID 6 modes of Btrfs are fatally flawed, and should not be used for "anything but testing with throw-away data." List of known problems and partial workarounds. See btrfs(5) §RAID56 STATUS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES for status updates.
>By default, systemd disables CoW for /var/log/journal, which can cause data corruption on RAID 1 (see #Disabling CoW). To prevent this, create an empty file /etc/tmpfiles.d/journal-nocow.conf to override /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/journal-nocow.conf (see tmpfiles.d(5) §CONFIGURATION DIRECTORIES AND PRECEDENCE).

This is your ZFS replacement, Linuxtards? lmao

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)11:01:56 No.106463430

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)11:01:56 No.106463430

>CoW
indian kernel

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)12:15:02 No.106464091

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)12:15:02 No.106464091

>>106463396
any fs is better fs than btrfs

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)12:26:16 No.106464197

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)12:26:16 No.106464197

>>106463396
but BTRFS allows me to throw all my old mismatched drives into a pool in raid10, can ZFS do that?

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)12:38:43 No.106464302

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)12:38:43 No.106464302

>>106464197
ZFS can do anything, it's the EMACS of file systems and that's why Linux (((maintainers))) don't want to add it.

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)12:40:35 No.106464323

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)12:40:35 No.106464323

>>106464302
Write a GPL compatible version and they'll add it.

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)12:41:46 No.106464337

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)12:41:46 No.106464337

>>106463396
Pajeet FS

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)12:56:01 No.106464461

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)12:56:01 No.106464461

>>106463396
>wrsfs

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)12:59:15 No.106464492

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)12:59:15 No.106464492

>>106463396
Just pull the filesystem and keep fixing it until you don't have to put up that disclaimer. Humiliation ritual.

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)13:06:59 No.106464566

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)13:06:59 No.106464566

>>106464323
They won't, because 2 GPL licensed implementations already exist and will never be added to the kernel, as long as Linus Cuckvalds is still in charge.

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)13:12:55 No.106464618

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)13:12:55 No.106464618

>>106464566
>already exist
Where?

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)13:15:56 No.106464645

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)13:15:56 No.106464645

>>106463396
I use RAID to kill mosquitoes. Why do you need RAID, ZFS or Btrfs?

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)13:19:27 No.106464673

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)13:19:27 No.106464673

>>106463396
i still use XFS

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)13:23:46 No.106464719

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)13:23:46 No.106464719

>>106464618
OpenZFS (zfsutils-linux on Debian, sys-fs/
zfs on Gentoo) and ZFS-FUSE.

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)13:37:18 No.106464849

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)13:37:18 No.106464849

>>106464302
please tell me how to make a ZFS raid10 pool with chunks instead of block devices

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)13:38:29 No.106464858

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)13:38:29 No.106464858

>>106464719
Neither of those are GPL or kernel modules.

Anonymous
09/02/25(Tue)14:43:47 No.106465442

Anonymous 09/02/25(Tue)14:43:47 No.106465442

>>106463396
I don't think anyone looks at it like a ZFS replacement.