Your response?
>>106464001cool stick figure. no wonder ai already won
>>106464001I'm not watching your left leaning white guy video essay. Explain or GTFO.
I used to watch her videos when I was 15, I'm glad she's still based as always.
>>106464001>>106464058looks unhinged
>>106464001>if you are an artist you deserve respect!KEK. artrannies STILL can't cope with being replaced? It's been 3 years already
>>106464117>>if you are an artist you deserve respect!She's right though. I'm a prompt artisan and I do deserve respect!
>>106464001My response is downloading one of the loras based on her """art""" and I'm going to use it for my ungodly fetishes
>>1064640011. Nobody cares.2. Doesn't actually work.3. Most of the time this entails making your own work look like shit, in which case you've played yourself.
>>106464277Video has 2mil views though, that's several grand if not several dozen.
>>106464331if I made a video that was comfort food for your feefees it would be very popular too but telling yourself something that is fundamentally untrue is fighting against reality. the amount of Peter Pan syndrome retards on the Internet is concerning, moreso than ai
>>106464001my response:
>>106464367What will we train our models on then??
>>106464376already existing data and future data from "artists" that don't do whatever shit is in the OP. just because you wish death upon (((artists))) doesn't mean you can't use their shit for free to make better models
It's depressing to be reminded that I share a hobby with some of the stupidest motherfuckers to ever pretend to be human.
>>106464001This shit only works for known architectures, only matters when you want to train the model from scratch for some reason and maybe for loras. Unreleased in-development models don't care.
>>106464001Based. Total aitroon death.
>>106464753"hobby"lolgaymen is a more respectable hobby than aijeeting
get this eceleb shit out my face>>106464117>replaced>It's been 3 years alreadytwo more weeks.>>106464220kek
>>106464912>aijeetingUhm, drawing?
>>106464912I'm curious to hear your thoughts on why>>106464968nogens have no rights
AI will cull and reduce numbers of useless "artist" so only real ones remain who can actual push art to new limits, from which AI will learn as well. I't just that shittons of idiots who paint cartoon sex for money are scared they will lose their bread maker. Fuck them
>>106465465>Fuck themI'm sure plenty will resort to prostitution, never done honest work
>>106464117>actual artists being replaced with low quality jeet ai image generatorsretard take
>>106465591oof, sensitive topic?
based lavender, if you use AI to generate "art" and call yourself an "artist" you're a useless subhuman who should hang themselves
>>106464001>seething literal who westoid artistlmao who cares
>>106464001It's a useless idea bwcause not enough people would do this to significantly affect an AI, and the companies training them can easily automate detecting these to not feed them to the AI
>>106464001>>106464376Blur -> Sharpen -> Feed modelPoisoned data behaves similarly to steganography - tiny incomprehensible changes to exact pixel values carry meaningful information. Loosing the exact pixel values loosed the data, in this case - the poison.This defeats all adversarial models, on a conceptual level. The only slight downside is the cost of blurring the image - however, that’s negligible when compared to the cost of actually training the model (both tasks are efficient to do on a GPU or a TPU, so no extra equipment is required).
>>106464983NTA but because at the end of the day no matter how fancy your prompt is you have so little control towards the end result its basically gambling for images.Which just like actual gambling I say whatever you do you, but its far from a respectable hobby.
>>106464001sorry, can't force gene back into the bottle.
>>106465850>>respectable hobby.>drawing gay furry porn for pennies is tho
>>106464001technology?
>>106465917AI is philosophy, astronomy, metallurgy or what?
>>106465935it's bullshit.
>>106464001I hate artists, I hope software replace all of them at some point, they're not owned a job, art is a hobby and nothing more.
>>106464001Artists are pretentious fucksAnd pretty ignorant if they believe that some "bad" images will destroy the whole algorithm
>>106465868Holy mother of retardation, if you do something for the money then it's not a hobby to begin with.
>>106464001b8 thread
>>106466048Nice try, IRS.
>>106466101OP's video is very much real
>>106464001>Your response?Inkcel, you will eventually fall behind.
Another day with the guy whose dad must have been raped by an artist making a butthurt thread about art.Day after day, he flails and seethes wildly hoping for recognition of his obsession.
>>106465848>Loosing the exact pixel values loosed the dataNot necessarily. There are steganographic methods resistant to some transformations.And blurring the image literally means losing data. I'm sure it's possible to interpolate data in a way that still makes it usable for training though.
>>106466120And you should engage.
>>106465850ehhh I disagree, I've spent enough time fucking around with it to know that you've got a lot more control over it than it looks like from the outside.
>>106465591YOU are retard. It's jeet quality artist (99,99999 percent of you tards) being replaced by white man quality AI and leaving real art to real artist. You animoo cartoon porn animal sex painting morons need to fucking die.
Only artist who are threatened are screaming about AI are low quality ones who recognize that AI will make better art then them.
the jeets are uppity today geg
>>106465850>you have so little control towards the end result its basically gambling for images.anon hasn't heard of controlnets I see
