Your response?
>>106464001cool stick figure. no wonder ai already won
>>106464001I'm not watching your left leaning white guy video essay. Explain or GTFO.
I used to watch her videos when I was 15, I'm glad she's still based as always.
>>106464001>>106464058looks unhinged
>>106464001>if you are an artist you deserve respect!KEK. artrannies STILL can't cope with being replaced? It's been 3 years already
>>106464117>>if you are an artist you deserve respect!She's right though. I'm a prompt artisan and I do deserve respect!
>>1064640011. Nobody cares.2. Doesn't actually work.3. Most of the time this entails making your own work look like shit, in which case you've played yourself.
>>106464277Video has 2mil views though, that's several grand if not several dozen.
>>106464331if I made a video that was comfort food for your feefees it would be very popular too but telling yourself something that is fundamentally untrue is fighting against reality. the amount of Peter Pan syndrome retards on the Internet is concerning, moreso than ai
>>106464001my response:
>>106464367What will we train our models on then??
>>106464376already existing data and future data from "artists" that don't do whatever shit is in the OP. just because you wish death upon (((artists))) doesn't mean you can't use their shit for free to make better models
It's depressing to be reminded that I share a hobby with some of the stupidest motherfuckers to ever pretend to be human.
>>106464001This shit only works for known architectures, only matters when you want to train the model from scratch for some reason and maybe for loras. Unreleased in-development models don't care.
>>106464001Based. Total aitroon death.
get this eceleb shit out my face>>106464117>replaced>It's been 3 years alreadytwo more weeks.>>106464220kek
>>106464912>aijeetingUhm, drawing?
>>106464912I'm curious to hear your thoughts on why>>106464968nogens have no rights
AI will cull and reduce numbers of useless "artist" so only real ones remain who can actual push art to new limits, from which AI will learn as well. I't just that shittons of idiots who paint cartoon sex for money are scared they will lose their bread maker. Fuck them
>>106465465>Fuck themI'm sure plenty will resort to prostitution, never done honest work
>>106464117>actual artists being replaced with low quality jeet ai image generatorsretard take
>>106465591oof, sensitive topic?
based lavender, if you use AI to generate "art" and call yourself an "artist" you're a useless subhuman who should hang themselves
>>106464001>seething literal who westoid artistlmao who cares
>>106464001It's a useless idea bwcause not enough people would do this to significantly affect an AI, and the companies training them can easily automate detecting these to not feed them to the AI
>>106464001>>106464376Blur -> Sharpen -> Feed modelPoisoned data behaves similarly to steganography - tiny incomprehensible changes to exact pixel values carry meaningful information. Loosing the exact pixel values loosed the data, in this case - the poison.This defeats all adversarial models, on a conceptual level. The only slight downside is the cost of blurring the image - however, that’s negligible when compared to the cost of actually training the model (both tasks are efficient to do on a GPU or a TPU, so no extra equipment is required).
>>106464983NTA but because at the end of the day no matter how fancy your prompt is you have so little control towards the end result its basically gambling for images.Which just like actual gambling I say whatever you do you, but its far from a respectable hobby.
>>106464001sorry, can't force gene back into the bottle.
>>106465850>>respectable hobby.>drawing gay furry porn for pennies is tho
>>106464001technology?
>>106465917AI is philosophy, astronomy, metallurgy or what?
>>106465935it's bullshit.
>>106464001I hate artists, I hope software replace all of them at some point, they're not owned a job, art is a hobby and nothing more.
>>106464001Artists are pretentious fucksAnd pretty ignorant if they believe that some "bad" images will destroy the whole algorithm
>>106465868Holy mother of retardation, if you do something for the money then it's not a hobby to begin with.
>>106464001b8 thread
>>106466048Nice try, IRS.
>>106466101OP's video is very much real
>>106464001>Your response?Inkcel, you will eventually fall behind.
Another day with the guy whose dad must have been raped by an artist making a butthurt thread about art.Day after day, he flails and seethes wildly hoping for recognition of his obsession.
>>106465848>Loosing the exact pixel values loosed the dataNot necessarily. There are steganographic methods resistant to some transformations.And blurring the image literally means losing data. I'm sure it's possible to interpolate data in a way that still makes it usable for training though.
>>106466120And you should engage.
>>106465850ehhh I disagree, I've spent enough time fucking around with it to know that you've got a lot more control over it than it looks like from the outside.
>>106465591YOU are retard. It's jeet quality artist (99,99999 percent of you tards) being replaced by white man quality AI and leaving real art to real artist. You animoo cartoon porn animal sex painting morons need to fucking die.
Only artist who are threatened are screaming about AI are low quality ones who recognize that AI will make better art then them.
the jeets are uppity today geg
>>106465850>you have so little control towards the end result its basically gambling for images.anon hasn't heard of controlnets I see
>>106464001why is the youtube channel text red?
>>106464001it doesn't work
>>106464001Our AI overlords will know who to target first.
>>106465850There are studies showing proompting triggers the same parts of the brain as gambling
>>106464001I watch some of her videos but I think she's flattering herselfLooking at AI slop I don't think any of them's stealing her art style specifically
>>106467080>white man quality AI>goonslop and distorted pictures triggering uncanny valley.
>>106470110>idiot who cannot comprehend progress is a continuationIn less than years, we went from nothing to something that is better than 99% of subhuman "art". Give it few more years, and you're all gone. Already it can produce things most of you filth-skins would not even know are AI generated.
>>106467080>You animoo cartoon porn animal sex painting morons need to fucking die.>implyingI too love making shit up.>>106470921>In less than years, we went from nothing to something that is better than 99% of subhuman "art".I disagree. No matter what you say, nothing will change the fact that this is false.
>>106470924You're free do disagree with whatever you want and that is probably the core of your being. Your whole existence is one huge cognitive dissonance. Enjoy the reality train soonTM
>>106470953>Two more weeks. Just trust me on this one. Two more weeks, guaranteed! Just you wait. You'll all see!
It statistically doesnt work, it's basically an AI model trained to break certain set of parameters by adding certain noise that only works for those parameters, to train this noise-injecting model you need an existing model to break and how much it breaks will give you the function which you have to maximize. It doesn't work for pretraining models.Of course, I don't expect artists to understand any of this, they were probably drawing porn of their teacher or some shit in highschool math class
>>106464001Buy an ad
>>106464001Any gen AI company worth its salt these days buys data from Shutterstock, Google etc. This tranny is achieving literally nothing.
>>106464001*scrapes your thumbnail*
>>106464001I think it's admirable. It's not going to stop AI but will at least put a dent in it
>>106471226>put a dent in itlike putting a 1x1mm dent into the Las Vegas dome.
>>106471242she's got the spirit at least. it's like david and goliath except goliath flattened david with a steamroller and is reversing over him again.
>>106470921And that 1% will remain almost forever like in basically everything AI touches. AGI will still be worse at almost everything then the top 1% humans for at least a century because most things aren’t as simple to calculate as being good at a game or crunching numbers. There will probably never be an AI that is better then all philosophers at philosophy for example.
>>106467688>>106467011You have to really try to get a single image, and even then you get various results depending on the seed, so you still have to gamble for the final results.>>106465868Gambling is the second lowest form of “hobby”, the only thing below that being edging.Besides porn artists aren’t really that affected. Their market has halved at worst, the real victims are people in the actual industry making something people here would consider art.
>>106465868>>drawing gay furry porn for pennies is thoWhy are you implying literally every single artist is drawing fucking furfag pregnancy inflation fart fetish shit? Is this some kind of deflection technique?
>>106471466>being edging>>106471486because a big portion of commission artists on the internet are
>>106471486Furry porn commission artists are the only ones who aren’t making less then minimum wage. Also it is hitting other artists as well.
>>106471486they are extremely overrepresented in the set of artists that shit themselves over AIthey are also the most affected by it
>https://youtu.be/DTqlSunIolI?t=640>if I didn't have surrogate activities, I'd spend my time on other surrogate activities
>>106464001I literally don't get it, what's the point of doing this? The only somewhat logical reasons I can come up with is that it's just for malice or they feel threatened by AI art, otherwise why would you even bother or give a shit? Someone explain pls?
>>106464001>>106471668oh noo
>>106471747Do you get mad when normalfags steal 4chan memes/OC and make money out of it? Same shit is with artists and other people who produce anything of value.
>>106471834>Do you get mad when normalfags steal 4chan memes/OC and make money out of it?No. I literally don't give a shit, why should I? Doesn't effect me.
>>106471882Right, necause you have never produced anything of value.
>>106471893Projecting much? If I contribute something for fun, I already got my reward, fun. Regardless of value or what happens to it.
>>106464331There are AI generated images and videos with 100M views though.
>>106464052It’s not even a guy and yes there is software that allows to poison AI with nonsense but keep the original drawing viewable. See how stupid you sound anon.
>>106472002No I don't see because I don't know what you're talking about.
>>106472024Why don’t you ask LiE Chatgpt and believe the fake imaginary software it created and you look for it in Google search to find the real name and collage people who made it.You had one simple answer to get it and you failed miserably.
>>106472065>IMG_0438kill yourself NOW phone poster
>>106472065I can tell that you're coping and seething about something but I still don't know what it is.I'm still not watching your quirk chingus white chick video essay.
>>106472121>>I'm still not watching your quirk chingus white chick video essay.>retard actually thinks OP is the video author lol, people with 2 mil subs don't advertise videos with 2 mil views on 4chan faggots with 22 subs do
>>106472182How new?
>>106472189>still doesn't realize it's a bait thread
>>106472196
>>106464045the stick is next to the real drawing you mongoloid
>be brahim high cast>girls reject me>arranged marriage girl died in train accident>best bro died when he hit electric pole>have rupees, and ask artist for bbc porn >artist rejects me>pool money with my 16 roomates for a gpu>make bbc ai slop>go to 4chan and defend my ai sloppa
>>106472817This has exactly what to do with OPs post?
>>106472817>be """"artist""">make a living off bbc furry inflation commissions>AI renders me obsolete>can no longer afford hormone therapy>seethe about it all day every day online>shit on indians even doe i worship people of color and hate white supremacy
>>106472839Even libtards hate jeets, even "come here legally" ultraboomers hate them.
>>106472825>>106472839>Replies right awayAre you guys actually jeets?
>>106472864No, just confused what it has to do with OP's post. Don't see OP defending AI slop anywhere.
>>106472873Read the thread, and look at the seething at a female using anti ai measures on her shitty art that wouldnt even be used for ai due to how low effort the art is
>>106472905>>106471765
>>106464001>be bg/layout artist>two years ago start doing leaves in a very specific style so that they form the shape of my watermark>occasionally see that shape in ai generated trees/backgroundslmaomao
>>106472956post art
>>106464001glaze/nightshade doesn't really workhere are the conditions to maybe see an effect in training>have to use the exact same model that the adversary noise was trained for>have to make no transformation to the image before training (resizing, blurring, antialisasing, de-edge or de-jpg...)>have to use the trained lora on a very similar modeland the most important>have to crank up the adversarial noise a LOT which will make very noticeable artefacts and reduce the quality of the workbut I do agree that all online services should shut down, as the main producers of garbage slop (and slop patreons) are subcontinentals too poor for gpus
>>106472864The AIjeet defense league is here. They coordinate themselves on discord.
>>106472864>>106473642What do you have against AI?
>>106464001it's best to ignore. giving attention just gives her more content like >>106471765
>>106473660Personally I don't care if some retard wants to generate their own porn or whatever. I don't like that AIjeets want to be "artists" or "programmers" so badly that they have to spam everywhere with their slop, calling themselves "ai artists" or whatever.It lowers the barrier of entry to many hobbies, allowing retards and browns to ruin everythingPlus most of them are Indians.
lmao basedAIjeets need to be purged
>>106474924too bad this won't change shitAI meme is too profitable thanks to retards to ever disappear
>>106471834>artists>produce anything of value>>>/r/eddit
>>106474946>AI meme is too profitable thanks to retards to ever disappearNTA but I agree. artists are right fighting against AIniggers but unfortunately they will loose.>>106475023good morning saar
>>106470921>idiot who cannot comprehend progress is a continuationNo, I will not accept your inferior progress because you said so.>In less than years, we went from nothing to something that is better than 99% of subhuman "art". Pure delusion>Give it few more years, and you're all gone. 2 more weeks and 6 gorrilion dollars to shlomo kikeman.> Already it can produce things most of you filth-skins would not even know are AI generated.Meds and BBC, NOW!
>>106475085>anon talks about "filth-skins">feels personally attackedHmm
>>106475054>cope>seethe>mald
my response:4chan janny d0x dumpgo fuck yourself you disgusting kike nigger sludgehttps://files.catbox.moe/r1zn79.7zdeath to israel, death to all kike niggers and their golems. there is no future for you.
>>106475145>project about ai replacing real artists>get BTFOd>sperg out about your opponent being a niggernever change, /g/
>>106465848>Blur -> Sharpen -> Feed model>Poisoned data behaves similarly to steganography - tiny incomprehensible changes to exact pixel values carry meaningful information. Loosing the exact pixel values loosed the data, in this case - the poison.>This defeats all adversarial models, on a conceptual level. The only slight downside is the cost of blurring the image - however, that’s negligible when compared to the cost of actually training the model (both tasks are efficient to do on a GPU or a TPU, so no extra equipment is required).that requires you to do it to all input images though.
>>106475184brown
>>106475254it's very easy to do batch operations on files. A blur -> sharpen pass is two lines of shell scripting, and takes about 2s per file.
>>106465465truthnuke of the thread number 1 >>106471024only sensible answer ITT
