[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I just tricked X to verify my age by taking a photo of my screen with this pajeet on it

well that was easy
>>
File: nothing.jpg (161 KB, 1200x600)
161 KB
161 KB JPG
they will only move the goalposts as people find workarounds. even when we get to the point where something like a retina scan is required each time you want to buy or post something on the internet, people will find a workaround or some rich guy will be murdered and his still-open eyes scanned to drain his bank account to some developing country, and then we'll have to all get bioelectrically powered cryptographically secured wireless chips implanted into our bodies.
>>
>>106464761
I think specifically with the UK/EU laws, companies are just loosely complying because they really don't care.

Technology to not allow photo scans has existed and has been implemented by much smaller companies in their client verification for over a decade now. If Xitter wanted to do it, they easily could.
>>
>>106465226
>If Xitter wanted to do it, they easily could.
We cant do it with javascript, saar.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.