>>106466946
When will you find these on an m.2 near you?

Reminder that every method to break encryption on quantum chips has turned out to still be faster on regular chips.

>>106466946
Are there not quantum resistant encryption methods and would they not be considered modern?

>>106467474
it would require rebuilding all physical network infrastructure

>>106467474
yeah but they practically have no support behind them. It's almost like someone doesn't want you to use them...

>>106467474
You have no idea what Quantum even is and you have never used a Quantum computer so please shut the fuck up forever

>>106466946
This is Microsoft scammery, there’s nothing that can run the algorithm that’d break current cryptography. And even then, we’ve already got post-quantum algorithms kicking about.

Quantum computing is like 98% scam investment grifting, like AI but even worse cause their claims amount to “it like computer, but quantum”, and conveniently ignore the fact they’re not useful for general purpose computation.

File: pepe35.jpg (15 KB, 567x540)

15 KB JPG

>>106466946
>"""""""Quantum Computer""""""""""
>*Look inside*
>It's not quantum
>It's not a computer

>>106466946
1. there is no evidence that Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip actually contains topological qubits instead of Andreev modes
2. even if it does, it's only 8 qubits, and a quantum computer that could use Shor's algorithm to break some types of asymmetric encryption efficiently would require thousands or even millions of qubits (depending on how many of the qubits are needed for error correction)
3. Shor's algorithm does not affect symmetric encryption; Grover's algorithm does, but it only makes a brute force attack more efficient, while still remaining unrealistic, so modern block and stream ciphers like AES and ChaCha20 would remain secure
4. quantum-safe algorithms have been in development for years and will be rolled out before quantum computers become a threat (if they ever do)

>>106466946
how so?
this very webpage is encrypted in transit it seems to me it works very well

>>106469173
There's no way MS wasn't flatout lying when they were talking about achieving a new state of matter earlier this year.

File: Screenshot 2025-09-03 at (...).png (2.02 MB, 1200x639)

2.02 MB PNG

>>106469369
and you think that with military tech being 30 years in front of commercial one that NSA cryptographers didn't already solve prime number factorization

newsflash bub, pic related exists
there is a pattern in prime numbers and their multiplications and the three letter agencies are guarding that fact harder than they did with the Enigma
your dumb ape monkey that regurgitates everything is just unable to comprehend that fact

>>106470136
>military tech being 30 years in front of commercial one
post evidence for that assertion or retract it
n.b. the fact that NSA discovered public-key cryptography before Diffie and Hellman doesn't count, as the state of public cryptography research has changed dramatically since then
>that NSA cryptographers didn't already solve prime number factorization
the difficulty of factorizing large integers is only one of the techniques that underlies public key cryptography
you have no evidence that NSA has solved it or any of the others
this thread (and my response to OP) is about quantum computers breaking current public key cryptography, not NSA advances in number theory

>>106470205
>bot response
and there you go with your creativity of needing proof for every claim (whilst asserting your claims while being taken at face value) and can't piece 2 things together (like the fact that pattern in prime numbers do exist and that there is a pattern in their multipliers just by getting that dimension in matrix)

The last one you didn't like so much that you even ignored that I even mentioned.
You probably have high opinion of yourself because you can remember factoids, probably have masters and earn above average for your age and skillset and you pride yourself on your achievements
Your trap is the ego you built around your identity which is why you will never go above the things you know you can already do

>>106466946
>Marijuana 1
it's going to break everything up to AES 420

>>106470244
>needing proof for every claim (whilst asserting your claims while being taken at face value)
that's not what's happening
you are not just making claims, you are making extraordinary claims, and that demands evidence
you are now whining because you have no evidence
>and can't piece 2 things together (like the fact that pattern in prime numbers do exist
the fact that a pattern exists doesn't mean that this information can be used to reduce or eliminate the difficulty of factoring large integers, and even if it did, you have no evidence that the NSA has been able to do so
if this pattern is so important to the problem and you've figured it out, go publish your findings and get your Fields Medal
>You probably have high opinion of yourself because you can remember factoids, probably have masters and earn above average for your age and skillset and you pride yourself on your achievements
you know nothing about me except that i speak English, use 4chan, and know a hell of a lot more than you do about this topic
>ego
so first i'm a bot, then i'm an egoic human
or am i an egoic bot?
you can't remain coherent for even a 150 word shitpost