[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why was it so overhated?
>>
Because upgrading from XP was buggy, if you did a fresh install it just worked.
>>
>>106467028
Yes. I was actually stable and millennium was also the same case.
If you had the right hardware it was good.
>>
because it was a buggy piece of shit that shipped with a slow 512mb single core rust spinning garbage pc
>>
Most prebuilt pcs didn't ship with enough ram.
Also nvidia was the lead crasher.
>>
>>106467028
The release of vista was the death of computing.
>>
I installed it on release and genuinely liked it, possibly because I didn't have some prebuilt dell shitbox and aero ran just fine
can't remember the gpu I had at the time, I think it was an ati x300 or something similar
>>
hardwarelets
>>
>>106467408
The hardware can't run optimally on unoptimised betaware OS that blue screens every other week. Most remained on XP and by the time SP2 was out most had their eyes on win7.
>>
It got put onto a lot of computers that had no business running it whatsoever
>>
How come no one ever back engineered these operating systems to work on today systems with today's requirements?
>>
File: vista_capable.jpg (26 KB, 150x220)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
>>106467028
Computers were sold with XP and the claim that "it totally can run Vista, trust me bro." But when Vista came out, those machines just could not handle it.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2008/03/the-vista-capable-debacle-intel-pushes-microsoft-bends/
>>
>>106467028
Lots PCs at the time could barely run it, and for the vast majority of people it coincided with the jump from 32-bit to 64-bit, which brought tons of driver issues.
>>
>>106467259
This. And bottom-barrel onboard video. Mechanical hard drives, etc. The worst possible platform, but MS wanted to pimp the user numbers, so OEMs got license keys pretty much free.
>>
>>106467028
Vista was fine. The problem was that OEMs threw it on hardware that could barely handle XP. On the enthusiast side, Nvidia dropped the ball on drivers of newly-minted 8800GTX. A sizeable number of enthusiasts upgraded to a 8800GTX + Core 2 Qaud combo to go along with Vista.
>>
>>106467038
fpbp, worked on my machine.
>>
read the truth
>>
>>106467028
new driver model meant a lot of things didn't work at first
many machines could run xp fine but not vista
>>
>sóylennials complained about vista
Truly the softest generation
>>
File: 1729684886481026.jpg (63 KB, 675x601)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
>>106467028
ITT:
>Windows Vista... Now that was a good Windows! Yep, they don't make 'em like that anymore! *sip*
>>
xp ran on toasters that could play cs 1.6 on low and flash games. vistas minimum requirements were already above the type of machine most people had AND required one to manually disable aero and display features, something the average person has no idea how to do



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.