>>106467053
Likely it will be integrated into the cpu and you have to spend shitload on a cpu.

>>106467103
Maybe?
At least on the PC side of things I don't see that happening any time this decade. They had years to do it, but apple beat them to it.
Maybe LLMs will either be the kick they need, or justification for keeping it separate

Yes, Swap on NVME has me sorted.

>>106468082
Doesn't that fail cause lat is too high? Or is there some special nvme were this works

>>106467053
y'all should try zswap, look it up on arch wiki it's easy to set up. with cpu improvements it will become even better, right now it's usually best to keep it 20-30% if you aren't memory starved, maybe 40% or even 50% on very low memory systems like mine (I use 40% with lz4 on my laptop with 8gb 2 of which are taken by vram for igpu, for example)

>>106468251
not sure if there's a windows equivalent for this concept of compressed dynamically allocated swap on memory that can swap its coldest pages to drive once it also fills out. macOS does have something like it but it probably sucks