>makes C obsoleteIs Hare the most based language?
>>106468364A bunny?
Redpill me a nocoder on this
>>106468364
>>106468364>80% of production code running around the world is now obsolete because the meme language-of-the-week is trending on Stack Overflow
>>106468397Also, your bunny is a cheap knockoff.
>>106468364That’s an opinion, but where’s the argumentation?
>>106468364You've been busy this week, Drew.
>>106468629I was busy with your mom as she was licking my head all week t. ddv
>>106468839Drew's a pedophile, he would never fuck anyone's mom, let alone the box of ashes living on my dining room table.
>>106468629wonder how many little boys he raped
>>106468364Yet its backend is written in C.
>>106468364what makes it different from other llvm frontends like rust, zig, odin, etc. with basically the same syntax?
>>106469993It doesn't use LLVM.
>>106470127what does it use then? gcc?
>>106470143https://c9x.me/compile/users.html
>>106470146mehqbe is cool but gcc versions from 10 years ago generate faster binaries
>>106468364Rope, Drew
>>106470273Lmao true
>>106468839That's not a very ally thing to say, drew
>>106468364I tend to stay away from Drew's ecosystem after he joined the anti-rms brainrot bandwagon. That alone would've been whatever, it was en vogue and many jumped on it then gave up.But then he went to harass and have constant meltdowns over that hyperland dude over basically nothing.The fact that he was basically just projecting and being a massive hypocrite is just the cherry on top.Bummer, sourceforge was a cool project, and so was hare+qbe.
>>106471763Sourcehut instead of Sourceforge I guess.
>>106468364apple there is maybe you eat it, or cider it, or hare won you can not lose can you?
>>106472045yeah
>>106471763> I tend to stay away from Drew's ecosystem after he joined the anti-rms brainrot bandwagon> sourceforge was a cool project, and so was hare+qbe.retarded tranny-brain take. If you think the sw is good you shouldn't care the personal opinion of who is behind the project
>>106473549the sw isn't good though
>>106473558you're right, but to be completely honest you're not
