i asked humanity's lord and savior how to cut a 3.5" circle from paper.
>>106469027It's a fine answer.
Brave AI is pretty shit too anon. They all are.
>>106469037>It's a fine answer.yes, for a 7 inch circle. option 1 and 2 were laid out correctly to make 3.5" circle (set compass to 1.75" or print it out), but option 3 would make a 7 inch circle.
>>106469062maybe specify whether you want radius or diameter next time?even humans can't guess what the fuck your dumb brain is thinking
String idea is stupid and impossible to pull off. You need to get a paint stirrer or something similar and drill holes in it. String will stretch and the knot you tie will be off.
>>106469189> but it's not the nice ai's fault if i sell you 5" speakers do you assume the drivers are 10 inches?!anyway it had already correctly assumed a diameter of 3.5" for option 1 and 2, then went retarded for option 3.
>>106469189Anon is obviously trying to milk a nonissue to say "AI bad"Took more effort to make this thread then would have been to say "I meant a 3.5-inch diameter circle"
>>106469027here's an interesting solutionfirst we need to make a perfect square from the paper. whichever edge of the paper is shortest, take the corner and fold it such that it aligns with the longest edge, creating a hypotenuse. this also creates another edge where if we cut along it, snipping the extra paper, we're left with a perfect square piece of paper.then fold it in half twice. measure the radius, or 1.75", from the central creased edge. then cut across the quarter of the circle. unfold it and voila, a circlethere's some error correction factored by the number of folds if you want to go deeper into the rabbit hole (left up to the reader)
>>106469804just tested it out and it worked but you don't need to make a square paper first, it's just common with origami. you could only fold once and cut a semi circle but it might be lopsided. folding it more than twice makes it harder to do without tools.there's also a papercraft board /po/ where you can learn tricks
>>106469221>>106469062>im bad at prompting therefore the LLM is wrongyea, there are some logical inconsistencies and nuances that LLM glances over but you could have easily specified, which would solve this nonexistant problemI mean, if you were to ask an intern or some low life low wage worker you would get even a bigger "fuck you" than you currently are with unpayed LLM
>>106469989This shit is only free because Scam Altman is setting retarded investment shitters money on fire to subsidise it, in hopes it’ll become so useful people will pay the $200 a month price tag it actually costs
