/g/ - >throwing custom Exceptions when validation fails - Technology

Anonymous

09/03/25(Wed)02:50:44 No.106470512

File: 1756785227679483.jpg (42 KB, 618x597)

42 KB JPG

Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)02:50:44 No.106470512 Archived

>throwing custom Exceptions when validation fails

Do peepo still really?

Anonymous
09/03/25(Wed)02:53:34 No.106470529

Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)02:53:34 No.106470529

It just works.

Anonymous
09/03/25(Wed)03:26:22 No.106470658

Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)03:26:22 No.106470658

>>106470512
Why are exceptions bad again?

Anonymous
09/03/25(Wed)03:58:51 No.106470788

Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)03:58:51 No.106470788

>>106470512
I do this.

Anonymous
09/03/25(Wed)03:59:50 No.106470794

Anonymous 09/03/25(Wed)03:59:50 No.106470794

>>106470658
They're heavyweight. That's fine if recovery isn't possible, in which case you want to capture and log as much data about what happened as possible. But if the exception is due to trying to insert a letter into integer storage, you really don't need all that overhead as the recovery pattern is to not do the insert and inform the user that they're retarded for entering crap. Also it makes it obvious to the developer that they were being lazy shits with input validation.