Bill Gates, the cofounder of Microsoft and a leading voice on technology, has made a fascinating claim: programming will continue to be a 100% human profession, even a century from now.https://www.leravi.org/bill-gates-reveals-the-one-job-ai-will-never-replace-even-in-100-years-10272/
It will be programming in cybersecurity branch*
>>106473795>programmingI thought for sure he would say "being a mom"
windows is such a piece of shit bill doesnt even use it in 2025. he uses linux and ios.
he should define programmingAI copy pastes scraped code the same as every other "human"
>>106473795>Old pedophile who owes all his success in life to his mother being friend with the boss of IBM thinks people are interested in hearing his point of view
>>106473974people still listen to Billy, he's a big guy in tech even though he's not at microsoft anymore.
>>106473874They're both programming, in a way.
>>106473876Incorrect, he exclusively uses Haiku.
>>106473795>programming will continue to be a 100% human profession, even a century from now.this sounds like a fukken challengeesp i have a couple ideas that could make it a thing
>>106473795No one will ever need more than 640K of RAM.
>>106473983for you
>>106473795AI will never replace young African children to test your drugs out on
>>106474747He never said that.
>>106473795Adrenochrome donors
>>106474784Kek, beat me to it. >here's the one job that'll never be replaced: african vaccinator
Humans won't even exist in 100 years
>>106474728Nah actually he uses netbsd on an amiga 4000T, I saw it
>>106474818they will, same as WoW
>>106473795Epstein Island client
>>106473795our /g/uy
I've been saying the sameEven if AI can write all the code, who is going to write the prompts that make the AI build what's needed?Software development is 90% figuring out what the requirements really are and 10% writing code.
>2025>people still associate Bill with Microshaft despite having retired nearly 2 decades ago and completely off any boards for nearly a decade
>>106475118he has some insider knowledge
>>106473874Real.
>>106473795saar pls don't drop out of the colleges my friends own
>>106473874There's no need for women going into the 22nd century. Women are obsolete.
>>106475118He's still very much active. He doesn't like the hustle and grind of regular management, but he's still into tech.
>>106475118>people associate the man who founded one of the largest tech companies in the world with said companywow how crazy
>>106473795Cope. Ai will replace all coders in 2 years.
>>106473874how about "being a man"you gynocentric inbred nigger
>>106475406that has already been replaced
>>106473795OpenAI really did fuck up big time.>>106475118He still has partial involvement with the company dummy
>>106475547nobody cares what you think inbred kike nigger.
>>106473974>implying he hasn't surpassed the boss of IBM>implying his mother isn't proud of him
>>106473795troubleshoot AI code to figure why tf it doesn't work
>>106473870No, it will be social work
humans = a pajeet working for bag of food
>>106473795Using your fucking web browser will not even be a human activity in 5 years.
>>106475700why not? what should be different than now?
>>106473795>Bill Gates not agitating developersFor once, thank you. This market is not really developer friendly and even if it's not true, I really appreciate the sentiment. Sifting through the constant stream of news about the doom and gloom of coding can make me frustrated especially since it seems to be a specific target of AI.Do I think it will be 100% human? Yes. People still have trouble connecting to Wifi and Bluetooth even if you spoonfeed them. Gen Z and the Gen Alpha are historically bad at tech to the point where Boomers are teaching them how to install Adobe. I don't think it will change until theres another generational breakthrough in tech literacy like there was with Millennials. I really wish AI would automate at least some of it, or the most annoying parts of it, where I have to announce, "TURN IT OFF AND TURN IT ON AGAIN" until it works. If AI is so great, why do people still need developers and IT to tell them to turn it off and on again?Don't get me wrong, I think AI is great. I just think the type of AI that will automate coding is worse than an actual developer. The current systems take a day or 2 where you might rack up a few thousand dollars in fees from it trying and failing over and over again. This easily becomes millions of dollars a year to brute force a AI that is as capable as a professional developer.When would this not be true? We're currently dealing with exponentials. It took about a year of training after ChatGPT was first released to get to GPT-4. Then 2 years for GPT-5 after that. It might take around 4 years (unless there's some breakthrough) for GPT-6 which would land around 2027 to 2030. Here's the release schedule assuming exponentials for training time,GPT-7 -----> 2035GPT-8 -----> 2045GPT-9 -----> 2065GPT-10 ----> 2105That's just the training time, which may not always be the case. However, we would also need exponentially more training data, which we don't currently have exponentially more.
>>106475406I thought about "being a dad" but unfortunately dads are easy to replace
>>106475359>>106475573Wrong. Bill has completely cut ties with Microsoft since 2020 after he left the board which is the last bit of influence he had on them.
>>106475869I think Bill Gates realizes there's an AI winter coming and it will be around the turn of the century until it thaws. Gates is invested heavily into nuclear forms of energy which he specifically states can help AI. The current state of the research didn't pan out since many forecasts had 2025 as the year when we would solve nuclear power. In fact, we did achieve significant milestones (theoretically greater energy produces than expended) but significant hurdles remain to scale it out. The current geopolitical environment is not one where we would put a nuclear plant in everyones neighborhoods around the world and expect things to go exactly as planned.Maybe Gates got a new forecast where 2100 would be the year when we solve pertinent energy consumption problems. It would make sense because the climate modeling specify 2100 as a very important year. Maybe the report Gates got lists 2100 as the most likely year where we solve our energy crisis and climate concerns.It's sad to say, but maybe the AI summer is over. It was fun while it lasted.
>>106475910no they're not you disgusting piece of shit kike. dads are irreplaceable. sons need fathers. stupid kike. mothers cant raise children.
>>106475943>I think Bill Gates realizes there's an AI winter coming and it will be around the turn of the century until it thaws.i think youre wrongi think in a decade but before two decades we will have very advanced aisyou know warhammer 40k?look up what a standard template construct isbc the foundations have already been laid4 years ago, kekhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdG4gUTowXc
>>106473795thats rich coming from a guy who claimed no soul on earth would ever in million years need more than 0.5 kb of memory on their computer
>>106475987https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20060024675/downloads/20060024675.pdfI would say the groundwork was in place even before that.My assumption is that it's exponential and it will remain exponential. However, I recognize that it can be hard to differentiate between an exponential and linear resources requirement. If it is truly linear in terms of how much we need to level up AI, then you are right. However, if it's exponential, then our current generation of AI is what we will have to work with until the next AI winter thaws.In a few years we will know for sure. My assumption is based on the diminishing returns of GPT-5 and I'm extrapolating on that for the future. Maybe OpenAI is pulling a Microsoft Vista with GPT-5 and GPT-6 will be akin to Windows 7. Personally, I wouldn't bet on that.
>>106476143thing isan llm is an *interfaceits the equivalent of a keyboardits a very advanced keyboardwith a powerful autocomplete we could saybut thats what it isan interfaceit has been proven that the future lies in heterogenous systems in the ai sensecertain parts MLcertain parts symbolicand of course an llm as interface
>>106475941He hasn't cut ties with Microsoft. He's just no longer on the board of directors.
>>106474906God I miss when he wasn't such a faggot. I dunno who I hate more, jobs or gates.
>>106473974i don't like him either but he's just stating the obvious
>>106473795Any job that requires touching people can't be replaced. Sure, being touched by a stranger is weird, but being touched by Freddy Fasber would be much weirder and uncomfortable
>>106473795jeets are not human thoughlbeit so his claim is moot
>>106473795>Bill "640k ought to be enough for anybody" Gates
>>106473795Test
>>106473874i don't get it
>>106473795Donno about that. I am a mech enginiger into RF. Chatgpt writes me hundreds of lines of perfectly working code for data analysis. That is already a direct replacement for a job I would have offloaded to a non-showering fake engineer
>>106476734Being touched by foxy tho...
>>106477399Zamn...
