[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: pepe-are-you-serious.gif (16 KB, 220x212)
16 KB
16 KB GIF
>apple machine vs pc comparison
>90% of benchmarks are videoediting(something on relevant to the person making the video and 3% of the population who are also youtubers)
>mac gets destroyed in every single other benchmark
why do they keep doing this
>>
>>106474608
I don't know, it's september though, so I guess freshmen are learning about 4chan.
>>
>>106474608
kys shill
>>
>>106474608
the most relevant benchmark for the average person is web browsing, which is almost entirely based on single core performance, which apple wins by a large margin compared to every cpu other than overclocked intel housefires using 10x the wattage
>>
thats how you win tho. you do what this guy does >>106474663 and pick the one thing your team is best at and make that the only thing that matters. nvidiots do it, amdrones do it, intel.. well lets be honest they used to do it. linyuks, winderps, macfags they all have that one thing they do better than everybody else except intel lol.
>>
>>106474663
Core Ultra (which is very safe) outdoes any Apple chip other than the M3 Ultra
>>
>>106474766
so you're telling me a 250w intel chip is ALMOST as good as apple's 140w chip? amazing
>>
i do it too. as an example: the only thing i care about, with a single caveat, is end to end latency. i do not care about power, or security, or compatibility even. i literally only care that my input is put on screen in full as fast as possible.
>>
>>106474608
Macbooks are only good for light tasks because M chip battery efficency.
>>
File: 1750737695148012.png (723 KB, 3018x1256)
723 KB
723 KB PNG
>>106474608
ARE YOU READY?
>>
its always been this way since apple silicon they're never going to change it
>>
>>106474608

like how many of these two million man and computer projects are successfull in life
>>
>>106474608
proofs?
>>
>>106475761
>apple event coming up
>shilling intensifies
WOWZA CANT WAIT FOR THE 2.000005mm LARGER iNIGG (matches the inflation of the amerimutt obesity index)

ps: consider jumping in front of a train marketing rashjeets reading this
>>
>>106474608
they're very efficient, a big plus for portable machines, macbooks are quite nice.
i agree on desktops though, not much of a point there



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.