what the fuck, youtube
underage b&
>>106474887youtoddlers BTFO
>>106474887>logging into YTngmi
>>106474987I even have 2 youtube accounts, one is for sleeping and ASMR only, the other is for regular watching
>>106474987I am 35. I have not logged into this shit in ages and I don't plan to. You get this stuff even if you don't log in and don't accept their spying conditions (aka cookies).
>>106474887You can get around youtube's age restriction with an alt made with us phone number. those can be bought for like 50 cents online or so. troongarian telcom sissy need not apply
>>106475049>Your U.S. carrier has records of your activity (call detail records, text metadata, data usage), even if the call itself is routed abroad, because billing and authentication tie back to them.>Under laws like the PATRIOT Act, FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act), and CALEA (Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act), U.S. carriers are legally obligated to provide certain data (metadata, sometimes content with a warrant) to U.S. authorities if requested.>This includes calls/texts/data that originate overseas but are billed to your U.S. number, since those records exist in the carrier’s system.fuck off glowie
>>106475077brainded nigger, what does receiving sms for account verification on random, disposable number to watch nsfw youtube videos has to do with some sort of state backed espionage. Are you retarded?
>>106475113>needing a phone number to watch youtubengmi
>>106475138the earth is healing
>>106475138so this is a virus, right
>>106474900fpbp
>>106475049rent free LMAOOOOOOOOO
>>106475128we live in a grim pajeet era in which spending 50 cents to watch restricted videos is the least evil solution. You can either adapt or get left behind.>inb4 y-you d-don't need youtube or whatever.
>>106475400xhe replied to my posts so many times with xhis faggy delusions that I would rather spit on xhim in advance.
>>106474887EU Digital Services Act, article 28 paragraph 2. Where there's a reasonable suspicion a user of a service is a minor, said service may not use direct targeted advertising for that user nor build up a profile of information to effectively do so.Under paragraph 1, services are required to protect minors against harmful content as well. But paragraph 3 limits that obligation so it does not apply where the only possible means of age verification involves forking over personal data such as mugshots for age estimation, CC info, or copies of national IDs.This is why you should be weary of shitholes like X which are playing the "think of the children!" card to get users from not just the UK (where the Online Safety Act actually does require this), but also from the EU to hand over personal data for age verification -- when in reality the only reason they legally need to do so in the EU, is because without you having proven you're of legal age they're not allowed to target you with aggressive scumbag advertising.
>>106474887>you're fucking retarded my dude, sorry to inform
