It is suppose to be change everything like https://dfimg.dfrobot.com/enshop/image/cache3/Blog/13462/1.png
two more weeks
Unironically needs more time. Retards these days get upset without instant results.
No software so no demandNo demand so no hardwareNo hardware so no software
>>106478722I understand for desktop usage, but for server functionality it's not bad. I have a banana pi bpi-f3 and there's not any software I haven't been able to get running. There was a few instances I had to compile but even then it wasn't too bad. Single core performance is pretty bad though.
https://tenstorrent.com/ Jim Kellers company is riscvNvidia is using riscvIt's growing
>>106478680the milk v oasis got canned and it's been all downhill from there
>>106478710kek, so 14 more days?
>>106478917No, more than that. Chips are hard.
>>106478819>it's not badFor HPC, x86. For low power, Arm. Both have stronger market positions, RISC-V has a long road ahead of it still.
Hack the planet!
>>106478680The general rule is- If it's being shilled by Youtubers, it's probably a nothingburger.We see this all the time. Framework laptops, VR, Pinephone, etc...
>>106478680Is there a RISC-V toy board that's recommended to test it out? How am I supposed to evaluate whether or not it's going to take over if I can't tinker with it for a few weeks then throw it in the junk drawer like my raspberry pi
>>106478680Every company wants their own extensions on top of RISCV so it ended up being worse than ARM where one chip brand is completely incompatible with another.Every RISCV SBC still requires their own maintained image to boot, while on x86/64 you just load a pc image and it will boot on any pc.
He's jewish
>>106478680>>106478710>>106478917Even longer. They ran away from the burgers after the Huawei debacle and relocated to chocolate country.
>>106478680Its gaining a lot of support but still about a decade away from taking a lot of ARM marketshare. Plenty of big companies are already making their future products based on RISC-V vs ARM. Nvidia being one of the larger tech firms doing as such.
>>106481094Nvidia isn’t using RISC-V in a way that will impact market share. RISC-V needs compute cores to be available to drive software to port over to it, which is not what Nvidia is providing.
>>106478917I hate zoomers
>>106479619Why bother with an ISA then ?
>>106482497no royalties
>>106478680Lots of new embedded chips have adopted it, and it's proven competitive on efficiency. As they get more powerful, a time will probably come that some high end products switch to it.A new architecture was never going to instantly compete with high end chips, the progression so far is exactly what people expected.
>>106482555>Lots of new embedded chips have adopted itThis. Tons of offerings from chinese fabs.
