Your computer will have 1TB of RAM and still won't be enough
640k should be enough according to retarded boomers
>>106479978Going from 8 to 16 was a massive jump in performance for me. I haven't noticed much from going from 16 to 32.
>>106479978no ai, no games, no my problem
>>106479978Jeetcoding is the problem.With this, no amount of RAM will ever be enough.
It's wild staying on the same PC hardware for 10 years and seeing software and websites that used to run smoothly on that hardware gradually stop working because of updates.
>>106480244What TSMC giveth, programmers on MacBooks taketh away.
>>106480193>not understanding what the other anon saidThe only zoomer here is you.
>>106480244Finally someone who understands.
>>106480927What is like to be unemployed and not have money for an upgrade? Yeah...
>>106480950Pretty sweet, actually. The trees and the stars never need updates and accessing them always runs smoothly.
The solution is to just not be a cheapskate. Figure out roughly how much RAM you need, then buy twice as much. Boom, you never have to worry about RAM and the extra cost will be completely negligible when amortised over the likely lifetime of the computer.There will indeed come a time where 512GB is the equivalent of 8GB today and 1TB will be "just about enough for most things". The answer will be to buy 2TB so you don't need to worry about it.
idk how i did anything with 2gb because i basically run the same programs and they started freezing with 8gb a few years ago (they work fine with 16gb... for now)at least its cheap
>>106480244all the websites I use have performed the same since 2015, why do you lie on the internet?
Yeah it won't be enough because of pajeet coding.
>>106480950How does it feel to be a braindead consoomer?
>>106482781For a few updates? Once every five to seven years? Great, actually.
>>106482119>There will indeed come a time where 512GB is the equivalent of 8GB today and 1TB will be "just about enough for most things". The answer will be to buy 2TB so you don't need to worry about it.The average PC hasn't really gotten more RAM over the last 10 years.
>>106480213and no job lmfaoooooooooooo
>>106479978I upgraded to 128gb of ram and still programs manage to chug.
>>106480244stop using chrome and performance will magically go back to normal
>>106480213>1440 × 900 Bruh >20250904_04h17m47s_grim.pngThe filename rightfully has the word grim in it.
>>106480213Based that's how to do it.
>>106479978You won't see that in your zoomer lifetime.
>>106479978I've had 32GB since 2019 I think
>>106479978My AI shitbox already have 1.5TB.
>>106482402I used to browse 4chan with 64MB of RAM and Firefox.
>>106485277What setup? Impressive. I guess in the good old days?
>>106480244I've seen webdevs say 8 cores isn't enough
>>106479978>2022>only 8GBgaymers are a weird breed of homo sapiens
>>106482968Yeah because they weren't bottlenecked by your RAM capacity to begin with.
>>106485584Except if I look at system resources my CPU and GPU are not capped.
