Which one, /g/?
cunnyhub
>>106493227Why not both?
>>106493227I prefer iron fox but they don't host it on github so it loses I guess
>>106493227I switched to gitlab when the CEO stepped back recently and the AI department took over
>>106493256
>>106493537mucho texto
>>106493227The one that doesn't accidentally erase your work due to incompetence>>106493537TL;DR labeling things to demonize them is such a tranny move. pedo = up to 1900 is healthy attraction to young fertile femaleThe real problem is that pedophilia is demonized and degeneracy is celebrated. Marrying (off) younger women has been a thing until the early 1900 in western nations and is still practiced everywhere else.Western society is fine with women whoring out in front of billions, but points at anyone calling it out. A person once replied to a whore "congrats, I am a complete stranger to you, but I can see your cleavage". Many retard seethed that is was "WEIRD" to look at a women's cleavage in an image posted on social media.This is the society you accept by denouncing early marriage while endorsing cutting off balls, sodomy, and whoring out. You may not agree with the rest either, but one leads to the other.Howso? The 'sexual liberation' initially lead to younger females getting tricked+pregnant (typical female behavior) and their conservative fathers getting angry. That coupled with the 'purity' feminist movement i.e. 'please let me ride trains then marry Joe, the loser, who will provide a house for me and my kids' which is a polite way of screeching 'stop marrying virgin girls instead of my 30 y.o. loose cunt' - gave us today where healthy attraction to younger fertile females is the same as kidnapping and raping kids.This also gave us the modern youth issues, where instead of worrying about learning a trade/getting a job/staying healthy you now have to worry about school all your child/teen years, hunting for hoes, and buying a house.Women were easily accessible by marriage, but now the 'modern' woman want all the right of old times e.g. man supplies food, house, so on and the rights of today e.g. wearing whore clothes, online whoring, polyamory, ruining the job market for men
>>106493227how about a cup of tea?
>>106493227i like sourcehut.
>>106494099I love Gitea
>>106494099thanks for the reminder. been getting lazy with selfhost stuff
>>106494099If only emailing wasn't total ass
>>106493227Selfhosted Forgejo.>>106494212I'm not going to pay for hosting my code, drew.>>106494099>>106494259>>106494406Checkout Forgejo. It's actually free software and not open-core, unlike Gitea and GitLab.
>>106493227git clone ssh://git@self-hosted-server/repo.gityou don't need faggy web interfaces for git
git clone ssh://git@self-hosted-server/repo.git
I use a combination of cgit and gitolite.
Gitea on a spare raspberry pi cluster
>>106494896>Checkout Forgejo>actually free software and not open-core, unlike Gitea and GitLabLMAO get fucked, freetard. Gitea is literally MIT licensed (i.e. actually free software), and Forgeojojohuehue (idk how to pronounce it) electively pozzed their codebase with GPL just so their code is less available to some developers. I'm not supporting this sentiment, I support actual freedom (of developers AND consumers, being both myself).
>>106495070do you plan to actually modify and release it? if not, wtf would you care about the license?
>>106493227>shit but generally performs well>unbearably slow and also shitCgit, just wish it had issue tracking, that's half the reason I even visit a git repo to see of my issue's been reported yet.
>>106495116I prefer when this is an option. It means it's more likely to be supported by others. I always prefer liberal licenses.Also, the fork's license got changed after they established themselves as a software as a service platform with it, while Gitea established that must earlier and still kept the free license to this day. One must be severely mentally challenged to think of the fork as le good guys.
>>106493227github gives me infinite build hours for free so that one, free shit
