I've been using it for a while and noticed that its performance is worse than CloudFlare's or any other major DNS provider's. I set it up to use DoH + Anonymous DNS relays and narrowed down the list to servers that are close to my location. However, sometimes it takes seconds to resolve a domain, sometimes it fails. And I have to emphasize "sometimes" because most of the time (like 99% of cases) it's fine, but it's noticeable because Google/Quad/CloudFlare is much better.Is it supposed to be like that or I'm using it wrong?
>>106494855
>>106494855dnscrypt is a protocolgoogle,quad9,etc. are providers\get a better provideradguard dnscrypt servers are very reliable, at least the filtered one
>>106495175>filteredWhy would anyone even use such? Do you need a parent to ask if you can open a website?
>>106494855just set up a resolver, it connects directly to the root nodes, can't be more private than that
>>106495288bait used to be believable